Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Chambers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Chambers

  • Postcode verified

    HD6 3XB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongexcellentimprovedmake good progressenthusiasmpositivesuccessfullyrobust
Criticismweakerlacknot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings594w+47
  • Leadership150w+74
  • What needs to improve108w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
833
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs HM Lennie Headteacher Rastrick High School Field Top Road Rastrick Brighouse HD6 3XB

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 11 and 12 October 2011 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of five lessons, together with shorter visits to an additional nine lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is good.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Students’ average attainment is illustrated by the 2010 GCSE results, when 67% of students gained a grade A* to C, compared with the national average of 64%. The unvalidated 2011 results are similar to those in 2010 and the school’s records indicate that current students are likely to maintain the school’s upward trend in results. In 2011, a greater proportion of girls than boys attained the highest A* and A grades.  Students, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make good progress in lessons and over their time in the school. Relative to their starting points, they make more progress than similar students in other schools.  Sixth-form students’ achievement is satisfactory. Attainment is average and students make satisfactory progress relative to their starting points. While, in recent years, some students have underachieved in Year 12, additional guidance and support have improved the progress of current

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

students so that more are on track to meet their targets than previously.  Students generally apply themselves well to the task in hand. They work well in pairs, supporting the learning of others. Students show good algebraic skills, particularly in solving equations by a variety of methods. Weaker students lack confidence in dealing with numerical work, such as negative numbers and fractions, decimals and percentages.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

The quality of teaching in mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

 Teachers make good use of assessment information to inform their planning and adapt the pace of the lesson. Where possible, they make links with other areas of mathematics and with students’ prior learning. They use starter activities well to revise and consolidate earlier work.  Teachers show enthusiasm and have a lively and positive approach in lessons; they encourage students and try to raise aspirations. Most teaching aims to develop students’ understanding rather than focusing solely on techniques but, occasionally, the mathematical methods taught are not fully discussed or explained.  While teachers are conscious of trying to develop students’ subject-specific vocabulary, students would benefit from additional opportunities to use new or unfamiliar vocabulary for themselves.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

The quality of the curriculum in mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

 The curriculum meets students’ needs well. In recent years, all who have entered the GCSE examination have successfully gained a grade A* to G. The small numbers for whom GCSE qualifications are not appropriate secure suitable alternative qualifications. In the sixth form, in addition to A-level and AS mathematics, an option to study further mathematics is available. Timetabled sessions support students who wish to retake their GCSE examination.  At Key Stage 3, a very detailed scheme of work offers very strong guidance and structure for different ability levels. In addition, it provides suggested focus questions for plenaries that provide excellent ideas for probing students’ understanding. The schemes of work at Key Stage 4 and in the sixth form follow closely the guidance published by the awarding bodies. Additional guidance to supplement the Key Stage 4 scheme, through giving reference to supporting resources and tasks, is in

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

development.  Department leaders are aware that a set of open-ended activities which focus on developing students’ skills in using and applying mathematics needs to be more fully integrated into the schemes of work to provide a more structured build up of skills and avoid any risk of duplication.  Students appreciate the opportunity to study at home using subject- specific software on the school’s intranet.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

The effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

 Leaders and managers provide strong leadership in developing teaching and learning within the department and contribute to developments more broadly across the school. They are playing a leading role in the school’s drive to develop students’ numeracy.  GCSE results show a steady trend of improvement and more students are achieving well relative to expectations. Students’ attitudes to mathematics have improved and the numbers choosing to study mathematics in the sixth form have risen.  The school’s systems have been sufficiently robust to manage the work of the department through a period of substantial staff turnover, while improving overall provision. Members of the department work well as a team and benefit from involvement in national initiatives.  Self-evaluation is accurate. Improvement planning has an appropriate focus on outcomes as well as provision and integrates well with whole- school planning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 strengthening progression in students’ learning through integrating open- ended and investigational tasks more fully into the schemes of work  ensuring that the methods used to solve mathematical problems are discussed and justified mathematically  continuing to raise achievement in the sixth form to match the good achievement in the main school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion