Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sally Kenyon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sally Kenyon

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressstrongmake good progressimprovedclearlysuccessfullystrengthseffectively
Criticismweaknessesweakerinconsistenciesunevenmissedvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
893
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: glaw@cfbt.com

p.1

Headteacher Saints Peter and Paul Catholic College Highfield Road Widnes Cheshire WA8 7DW

p.1

Paul Catholic College

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 18 October 2011 for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to your governors and students.

p.1

Paul Catholic College

Since the last inspection some significant changes to staffing have taken place. These include a new deputy headteacher appointed in April 2010, and a restructured and now extended leadership team appointed in April 2011. All teaching and learning responsibilities within departments have been redesigned and some new appointments made.

p.1

Paul Catholic College

As a result of the inspection on 20 January 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Paul Catholic College

The proportion of students gaining five or more A* to C grades at GCSE level including English and mathematics has increased by 17 percentage points from 2009 to 2011. Now, most students leave with five or more passes at A* to C, which is a considerable improvement since the 2009 results. Challenging targets are now set and all staff have been trained in the use and analysis of data. The proportion of students making expected progress from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4 in English and science has seen strong improvement. However, progress in mathematics has been marginal. As a result the school has taken decisive action by making a number of key appointments in the leadership of this department and entering the whole cohort early, already securing 52% A* to C grades at GCSE level in Year 10. Students are now in targeted groups as a result of this and any student who did not make expected progress will be re-entered in November. Discrete

p.1

Paul Catholic College

parent consultation evenings take place for students not making expected progress towards their targets in addition to the usual parents’ evenings. September 2011

p.1

Paul Catholic College

Page2 Progress in the sixth form is uneven. Results for 2011 were disappointing overall although some subjects have seen clear improvements in results, such as geography, politics and physical education. Issues around retention of students from AS to A2 level have had a negative impact on results, so entry requirements for some subjects have been increased and monitoring and tracking of individual progress intensified, particularly at AS level. Some good quality teaching was seen in the sixth form and students spoke highly of the support available to them and of an improvement in facilities since the last inspection. Where good teaching was seen, students were enabled, through meticulous planning and assessment, to take ownership of their own learning. For example, in a design and technology lesson, students worked independently on their projects using bespoke written feedback from their teacher. The teacher was a facilitator to their learning and able to spend time with those

p.2

Paul Catholic College

Assessment has improved through a concerted focus on developing assessment to support learning through ‘steps to success’. All schemes for learning have been reviewed to ensure that opportunities for assessment are not missed. In the best lessons, clearly focused learning objectives and outcomes relate directly to National Curriculum levels or GCSE grades and students of all abilities clearly understand what they are expected to achieve in those lessons. In the weaker lessons, ‘success criteria’ are not differentiated to allow all students to make good progress. Senior and middle leaders are reducing variation both in and between departments successfully through coaching and performance management.

p.2

Paul Catholic College

The headteacher and members of the governing body have made valuable strategic decisions to enhance capacity further, including new appointments to the senior team. New systems for data analysis, monitoring and tracking have served to increase accountability. Every member of staff with responsibility for a GCSE, AS or A2 class now has an interview with senior leaders to analyse and account for their results. Members of the leadership team have analysed their individual strengths and weaknesses in order to work most effectively together.

p.2

Paul Catholic College

Each department now meets weekly for strategic planning and all staff with teaching and learning responsibility have undergone leadership and management training. The local authority and leadership consultants have supported the school in refining professional development to ensure whole-school priorities are met and that there is a measurable impact on outcomes. Middle leaders are monitoring their departments more rigorously through learning walks and work scrutiny although opportunities are missed for this group of leaders to work more collaboratively.

p.2

Paul Catholic College

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

January 2010:

■ Raise attainment and improve progress, particularly in mathematics and English at Key Stage 4.

p.3

January 2010:

■ Share best practice in order to remove inconsistencies in the quality of assessment to increase its impact on students' learning.

p.3

January 2010:

■ Raise achievement in the sixth form in those subjects where it is not high enough.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion