Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Maureen York

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Maureen York

  • Postcode verified

    W3 7PD

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelypositivelywell plannedclearfeel safeconfidentkind
Criticismconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings385w+66
  • What needs to improve96w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
475
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs B Joseph John Perryn Primary School Long Drive Acton W3 7PD

p.1

bullying practice in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 28 September 2011 as part of our survey of schools’ work to create a positive school culture and prevent and tackle bullying.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The new senior leadership team is building effectively on the established culture of mutual respect. The five golden rules are highly visible and staff and pupils attached great importance to them. The diversity of the community is viewed very positively and there are clear expectations about how all members of the school should treat each other.  Pupils feel safe in the playground and around the school more generally, and their view was that the majority of people are kind. They emphasised that they should walk around the school quietly and during the inspection they were calm and considerate. Staff are visible and available, while the ‘buddy’ system encourages a sense of care for others among the older pupils.  The curriculum is well planned so that it exemplifies the school’s expectations and supports pupils’ moral and social development. There are daily opportunities to explore issues of concern in circle time and these are

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

explored further through the personal, social, health and citizenship (PSHCE) curriculum.  Pupils know what is expected of them and are clear about what they should do if they are bullied. They spoke of being role models and connected a respect for others with how they behave in class. One spoke of ‘learning nicely’. They understand the different forms that bullying can take and are confident that they will get help if they ask for it. Teachers spoke positively about the improvements in the way that the school has tackled bullying over the past few years and they clearly understand their role in encouraging positive interactions between all groups.

p.1

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the analysis of the school’s central record of bullying incidents so that trends can be reported to governors more effectively  developing the evaluation of the PSHCE curriculum to inform the future planning of anti-bullying approaches.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion