Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Morgan-Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Morgan-Price

  • Postcode verified

    W3 9JR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestrongimprovedproudeffectiveclearlysafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings408w+78
  • What needs to improve140w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
542
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Cleugh Headteacher St Vincent’s Catholic Primary School 1 Pierrepont Road London W3 9JR

p.1

bullying practice in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 26 September 2011 as part of our survey of schools’ work to create a positive school culture and prevent and tackle bullying.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

bullying practice in schools

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Pupils clearly understand what actions or words constitute bullying. They appreciate the use of ‘circle time’ to discuss class issues and to resolve relationship conflicts. They behave well towards each other in the playground and around the school. They know who they can turn to if they have a problem and that school staff work hard to resolve their issues quickly. Pupils spoken to were overwhelming in their feeling of safety in the school and the positive contributions that the prefects, ‘buddies’, and the head boy and girl make towards creating this safe environment. Pupils spoke highly of the ‘friendship stop’, which is an area they can go to in the playground when in they are in need of a friend. Pupils know they can also use the classroom’s ‘worry box’ if they feel in need of help or support.  The school’s ethos of staff and pupils treating each other respectfully is prominent in the minds of the school community. The school leaders have

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

worked well to create a culture where pupils are rewarded for their good behaviour. Punitive measures have not been implemented, which has resulted in pupils taking responsibility for their behaviour. It has also fostered a strong climate of discussion by pupils and staff of how behaviour can be improved. These actions have assisted an improvement in some pupils’ outcomes. For example, attendance has continued to rise since the previous inspection and there has been a reduction in after- school retentions.  Increased pupil involvement by the senior leaders has led to them devising their own class rules, of which they are very proud. These rules are displayed in every classroom and are reviewed and discussed regularly during lessons.

p.1

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 extending the refresher training for staff to ensure that they have a broader awareness of the range of behaviours that constitute bullying  sharpening the reporting and analysis of bullying incidents to enable leaders to have an appreciation of the trends over time  critically analysing and evaluating the impact of curriculum development in personal, social and health education (PSHE) across the school so that leaders have a firm view of what has been effective and the impact on pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion