Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patricia Metham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patricia Metham

  • Postcode verified

    RH19 3TY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingconsistentlystrengthsconfidentextremelystrongimproving
Criticismseriouslylimitednot confidentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings669w+80
  • Leadership77w+78
  • What needs to improve86w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
818
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Percy Headteacher Estcots Primary School Bourg-De-Peage Avenue Lewes Road East Grinstead RH19 3TY

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 6 October 2011 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of seven lessons and of guided reading sessions in each key stage; and discussion with two senior staff from the secondary school to which many pupils transfer.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Overall attainment in Key Stage 2 has been consistently well above average. Provisional results for 2011 indicate a continuing upward trend, with over 90% of boys and of girls achieving level 4. More than half of the girls in Year 6 achieved Level 5 while the proportion of boys attaining Level 5 was broadly average.  Steps are being taken to close the gender gap - for example, by gearing texts and topics to boys’ interests and by increasing the use of computers and media technology. Boys generally perform as well as girls in class, often taking the lead in group work, but their writing is less well developed. Well-directed interventions are, however, now improving boys’ performance. Boys speak with pride of being among the ‘high fivers’.  Pupils currently in Years 5 and 6 and in last year’s Year 6 entered the school with skills below those expected for their age, so their attainment represents excellent progress. Secure assessment across all key stages

p.1

Achievement in English

shows attainment rising in step with improving entry levels. Pupils’ particular strengths are in speaking and listening, although writing is generally accurate, thoughtful and well presented.  Pupils are very keen learners, responding enthusiastically to the variety of learning opportunities provided. They work well collaboratively, follow teachers’ directions conscientiously and take their personal targets very seriously. As a Year 5 pupil remarked: ‘We know how we're doing and what to do next.’  Those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities progress as well as others, benefiting from one-to-one reading support and well- deployed support in mainstream lessons.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is good with outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 There is a collegiate approach, with teachers sharing planning and, in effect, team teaching since the two-year curriculum cycle means that classes often share spaces and activities. Particular strengths include: secure subject knowledge; an excellent rapport with pupils; effective deployment of support staff; varied and productive use of computers and media technology; consistently applied strategies to check and reinforce pupils’ understanding during lessons; and regular and constructive marking. Teachers often pose questions to prompt review and redrafting, to which pupils write responses, and the impact of marking is evident. Phonics are systematically and effectively taught in the Reception class and reinforced throughout Key Stage 1.  Pupils speak highly of their teachers: ‘They give us fun activities…They help us when we need it.’ Pupils work happily in ability-based groups, confident that teachers are supporting them well and giving everyone a

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

chance to participate: ‘We do everything, so we don’t feel left out.’  Teachers give pupils very firm guidance on organising their work. While this clearly helps to embed important skills, there is limited evidence of independence and originality in pupils’ books.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 A carefully constructed framework ensures meticulous coverage of National Curriculum content and skills. Care is taken to integrate speaking and listening, varied technology, ‘hot-seating’ and role play within each unit. All units are designed to drive the development of skills and are linked well to engaging fiction and non-fiction texts.  Planning works on a two-year cycle, with sufficient flexibility built in to allow cross-over between years so that, for example, the most able pupils in Year 3 work alongside Year 4 pupils and respond well to that challenge. Less able or less confident pupils also feel well supported and able to develop at their own pace. Year 6 pupils were definite that this system does not inhibit progress: ‘We do the same things but the tasks are harder.’  As well as visiting authors and theatre groups and special events such as Book Week used to complement the mainstream curriculum, weekly clubs

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

encourage the more able to extend their range – principally the Magazine Club and the Book Club.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

The effectiveness of leadership and management in English is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 You present an extremely coherent, well-informed and confident vision for English. Substantial responsibility for curriculum development and the monitoring of teaching and learning have been very successfully delegated to middle managers, with continuity achieved through the school development plan. One of the senior leadership team has an overarching responsibility for literacy. The impact can be seen in rising attainment and strong progression from year to year.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 increasing opportunities and incentives for pupils to be independent, challenging and imaginative, especially in their writing  extending strategies to bring boys’ writing up to the level of the girls’.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion