Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Elaine Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elaine Taylor

  • Postcode verified

    SE7 7DG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+94Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingexceptionallyhigh expectationswell plannedloveenthusiasticenthusiasm
Criticismmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings614w+93
  • Leadership120w+73
  • What needs to improve79w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
800
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Beames Headteacher Cherry Orchard Primary School Rectory Field Crescent Marlborough Lane London SE7 7DG

p.1

languages (ML)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 5 October 2011 to look at work in ML.

p.1

languages (ML)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

languages (ML)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of two lessons; a visit to the lunchtime French club; and a visit to assembly for the whole school.

p.1

languages (ML)

The overall effectiveness of ML is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in ML

 Pupils love learning languages and are exceptionally enthusiastic and willing to join in with all aspects of the subject. Older and younger pupils work together learning songs in assembly. In class, speakers of a wide range of languages engage in speaking or singing French with good pronunciation and intonation.  Throughout the school, pupils use French for real communication and the older pupils are starting to write creatively, for example describing dragons as part of a whole-school cross-curricular theme.  Pupils have a good understanding of the culture of countries where French is spoken. Their broader intercultural understanding is excellent because the school celebrates the wide range of languages and cultures in the school. They understand and appreciate learning languages not only for practical reasons, but also see how it can help them in other subjects such as mathematics and English.

p.1

Quality of teaching in ML

The quality of teaching in ML is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ML

 All members of the school community communicate enthusiasm for languages. Teachers have high expectations and inspire their pupils. The specialist teachers of French have excellent subject knowledge and combine their knowledge of both subject and primary pedagogy well.  Lessons are well planned and identify where the most able will be challenged and where the least able will be supported. Teachers have a very clear understanding of the needs of all their pupils and meet them well, including providing opportunities for those who already speak French to develop leadership skills.  Learning proceeds at a fast but not frenetic pace, because teachers devise imaginative enjoyable activities with excellent resources, including technology. At every stage, they manage the activities almost exclusively through French with expert skill.  The school has a well-developed system for assessing pupils’ progress regularly. However, during lessons where pupils are required to repeat

p.2

Quality of teaching in ML

new language after the teacher, opportunities are sometimes missed to check closely whether every pupil is confident and ready to use the language productively for themselves.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ML

The quality of the curriculum in ML is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ML

 From the moment pupils enter the school, they are given a taste of French in a structured way that lays the foundations for later work. As they move through the school, the progression that is expected in their learning is clearly identified. The programme includes discrete weekly sessions, supported at other times throughout the week, and enrichment and extra- curricular opportunities. For example, in the lunchtime French club, very young pupils enjoyed exploring a French version of The Very Hungry Caterpillar, enthusiastically joining in with the numbers, days of the week and names of food that they recognised.  Schemes of work are very clear and identify where cross-curricular links will be made. Displays celebrate achievement, develop an understanding of the culture of French-speaking countries and support pupils’ recall of vocabulary and structures.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ML

The effectiveness of leadership and management in ML is outstanding.  You and the other leaders in the school value language learning highly and understand how to support pupils’ development of language skills and their intercultural understanding. This common sense of purpose extends to all members of the school community. Consequently, languages have a high profile in the school.  Provision is monitored regularly and the subject leader uses information on the progress pupils’ are making to refine the curriculum and the teaching. This includes carefully checking the progress of different groups within the school so that all make the same excellent progress.  The governing body takes a keen interest in the subject and members have observed French lessons.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 refining the way teachers use repetition exercises to enable them to check more precisely how well individual pupils have mastered the new language.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ML in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion