Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Nov 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Dowgill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Dowgill

  • Postcode verified

    BN16 4HH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectivelyhigh-qualityvery effectiveenjoyhigh expectationsoutstandinghigh quality

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings749w+89
  • Leadership216w+84
  • What needs to improve109w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,048
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Brixey Headteacher The Angmering School Station Road Angmering Littlehampton BN16 4HH

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 11 and 12 October 2011 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of seven lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is good.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 The proportion of students attaining GCSE A* to C grades has fluctuated over the last three years. However, when compared with national results, the school’s results are regularly above average. There has been a steady improvement in the percentage of students attaining the A* and A grades and this is now broadly average. Based on their starting points, the progress of students studying GCSE is good.  Teacher assessment of students’ performance at the end of Year 9 indicates that the standard reached by the large majority is above national expectations. These students are making good progress. Not enough students, however, achieve the highest National Curriculum levels.  By the end of Year 13, the standards students attain are broadly average and over the last few years, there has been a steady improvement in the proportion attaining the higher grades. For the last two years, students have made good progress.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 The progress made by most students in lessons across all year groups is good. GCSE students are enthusiastic in their learning and demonstrate a good understanding of geographical processes and can accurately recall a wide range of specific places they have studied. All students appreciate the relevance of the subject.  The very large majority of students enjoy geography and this is reflected in their engagement in lessons and good behaviour. GCSE students work well without direct teacher supervision and can concentrate for significant periods of time on the tasks in hand.

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

The quality of teaching in geography is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

 Teachers have high expectations of students and this is evident in their generally detailed planning. The expectations, however, need to be more explicit when focusing on those aspects of planning that relate directly to learning for the higher attainers.  Teachers communicate their enthusiasm for geography very effectively to the students and, as a result, they understand the importance of geography in understanding the world they live in.  High levels of subject knowledge and expertise are deployed well by teachers in their planning and teaching.  A broad range of teaching strategies is used by teachers to engage students effectively in their learning. Some of these are very innovative. Resources used are usually of high quality.  Teachers effectively use a variety of maps as part of their everyday teaching and good use is made of information and communication technology by both teachers and students. Geographic information

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

systems are used occasionally to support students’ learning and the department is aware that this is an area for further development.  Learning activities are organised well so students have good opportunities to work collaboratively. Where appropriate, students are provided with opportunities to make decisions about their own learning and work well independently. They enjoy this and rise to the challenge.  Students in all years are aware of their targets and know what it is they have to improve and how to do this. This is due to the regular formal assessment by teachers and grading of students’ work supported by high- quality written feedback.  Marking of students’ work completed in class and at home is frequent and as well as checking for completion, teachers provide short-term targets to show students how to improve their work. Teachers also pay close attention to correcting students’ spelling.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

The quality of the curriculum in geography is good.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The curriculum in Key Stage 3 is broad and balanced and includes themes in human and physical geography as well as the discrete study of places. This is strongest in Years 8 and 9.  Detailed schemes of work are in place for each unit of work that link to key geographical concepts and skills and indicate how learning is to progress within each theme. However, there is no overview to show the coverage of the concepts and skills across the curriculum or how these are developed over the three years.  Students have good opportunities to develop their geographical skills across Years 7 to 9. However, this is not the case with fieldwork.  The examination specifications for Key Stages 4 and 5 meet the students’ needs well and ensure continuity in their learning.  Current initiatives are integrated into the curriculum as and where is appropriate. From Year 8 upwards, there is a good focus on the global dimension.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

The effectiveness of leadership and management in geography is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

 The subject leader has a clear, well-articulated vision for geography. Staff share a common purpose to raise standards and to ensure that students have a high-quality experience. Good practice is shared readily and collaborative working is a feature of the department.  Across the department, there is a high level of subject expertise, which is enhanced by regular professional development. Very effective use is made of the initiatives provided by the subject associations and these have had a positive impact, for example, in increasing the number of students opting to study geography.  Self-evaluation and the monitoring of performance are regular, rigorous and accurate and result in a well-focused, manageable improvement plan. Targets set are aspirational yet attainable.  The recent recognition of the work of the department through a national quality award reflects the hard work and success of the subject leader and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

staff in bringing about improvement and their commitment to providing the highest quality learning of geography.  The subject area is a vibrant learning environment with high-quality displays including a significant proportion of students’ work.  Good use is made of the school’s virtual learning environment to allow students in all years to access work in geography out of school hours.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that there is more challenge for the higher attainers so they are able to readily access the highest National Curriculum levels and examination grades  reviewing the Key Stage 3 curriculum to ensure that there is clear progression across the three years in the key geographical concepts and skills, and in fieldwork.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion