Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Kempton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Kempton

  • Postcode verified

    TR3 6LT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingconfidentsecure knowledgewell supported
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings495w+65
  • Leadership103w+39
  • What needs to improve74w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
652
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr S Mulcahy Headteacher Richard Lander School Higher Besore Road Truro Cornwall TR3 6LT

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 20 September 2011 to look at work in PSHE education.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with senior staff, staff with responsibility for, or associated links with PSHE and two groups of students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of four lessons.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The overall effectiveness of PSHE education is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE education

Achievement in PSHE education is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE education

 Students are confident to articulate their secure knowledge of sex and relationships and drugs education.  They know how to resist peer-pressure and have developed good awareness of their own views and values.  Students have good social skills and know how to speak to visitors. They show respect for all adults and each other.  They develop considerable self-esteem through involvement in a wide range of high profile projects and competitions, many with external agencies that prepare them well for the world of work.  Students learn to empathise with those less fortunate than themselves through their extensive charity work and practical support for students in other countries.

p.1

Quality of teaching in PSHE education

The quality of teaching in PSHE education is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in PSHE education

 Teachers plan thoroughly for lessons and use a wide range of resources to stimulate discussion.  They have good subject knowledge and are aware of the local issues facing students in the community.  Teachers ensure that lessons contain frequent opportunities for students to discuss issues in pairs and groups.  The range of questioning strategies used to challenge all students in lessons is limited and does not involve enough students.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PSHE education

The quality of the curriculum in PSHE education is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PSHE education

 Good use is made of outside professional partners who support and enrich key areas of the curriculum. Students value the personal experiences these speakers bring to the curriculum.  The curriculum is carefully mapped to ensure that key topics such as sex and relationships, and drugs and alcohol education, are regularly revisited each year with age-appropriate levels of challenge.  The curriculum is well-taught by subject specialists in dedicated curriculum time in all year groups.  The curriculum permeates all areas of the whole school. The development of the individual is central to the school’s values.  Links and visits to other schools in this country and abroad have a major impact on developing students’ attitudes and personal perspectives.  An appropriate accredited PSHE pathway is followed by those students whose circumstances make them vulnerable in Key Stages 3 and 4.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE education

The effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE education is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE education

 The subject leader supports colleagues well and ensures they receive appropriate training. All members of the team are involved in subject developments and feel valued.  You and the senior staff ensure that PSHE education has a high profile across the school. You value the contribution that a range of different subjects makes to students’ personal development, for example, work- related learning and enterprise opportunities.  The good monitoring of teaching ensures that staff feel well supported.  Departmental improvement plans, while detailed, currently do not focus sufficiently on measurable outcomes.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 expanding the range of questioning strategies used by teachers in lessons to challenge and involve all students.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion