Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Jones

  • Postcode verified

    CT13 0LR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingexemplaryskilledvery wellgood progressstrongenthusiasm
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings532w+89
  • Leadership120w+84
  • What needs to improve82w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
714
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr T Halling Headteacher Eastry Church of England Primary School Cooks Lee Eastry Sandwich CT13 0LR

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 22 September 2011 to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science

The overall effectiveness of science is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in science

 Pupils start school in the Early Years Foundation Stage with attainment that is just below the expected levels for their age. They make excellent progress and reach high standards by the end of Year 6. Almost all pupils reach the expected Level 4 with more than three quarters of them reaching the higher Level 5.  Different groups of pupils in the school are all achieving equally well. Those with special educational needs and/or disabilities make very good progress as they receive very good support that meets their needs.  As a result of a strong emphasis on investigative science, pupils develop good experimental skills and are keen participants in lessons, approaching their work with obvious enthusiasm. Behaviour is exemplary.  Science is valued for the important contribution it makes to pupils’ knowledge and understanding of the world from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Year 6. Pupils appreciate the opportunities they are

p.1

Achievement in science

given to find out things for themselves and get involved in practical activities.

p.2

Quality of teaching in science

The quality of teaching in science is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in science

 Teachers’ relationships with pupils are excellent with high levels of trust and mutual respect producing a very positive learning environment. Teachers are skilled in using questioning to encourage pupils to explore their own ideas and develop their understanding of scientific concepts.  Lessons are planned to cover a very good range of learning experiences that encourages pupils to be actively involved in their science learning.  Assessment is used well throughout the school to support learning. The secure monitoring systems used in literacy and numeracy are being extended to science. The school is currently putting a lot of effort into monitoring pupils’ scientific and experimental skills.  Good written and verbal feedback given by teachers to the pupils ensures they know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve. Pupils’ skills in assessing their own work are less well developed.

p.2

Quality of teaching in science

 Learning is well supported by skilled and experienced teaching assistants who are valued members of the teaching team.  Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage has an excellent focus on independent activities that allow pupils to explore, investigate and find out.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in science

The quality of the curriculum in science is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in science

 The science curriculum is visible around the school through some excellent displays of pupils’ work. In classrooms these are used interactively by the pupils and form a valuable teaching aid.  The locally prepared external scheme used by the school has been adjusted and changed to meet pupils’ needs. The scheme provides good coverage of all aspects of the science curriculum and supports the assessment of standards in science.  The school has worked hard to introduce a more creative approach to their teaching that concentrates on how pupils learn. This has been successful in science although links across other subjects are not so well developed.  The science enrichment days are much appreciated by the pupils who say these are their ‘favourite science activities’.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in science

The effectiveness of leadership and management in science is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in science

 Science is very well led with an excellent emphasis on maintaining an investigative approach. The subject leader has a clear vision for developing the quality of science education across the school.  Regular review ensures that the monitoring and evaluation of science provision and outcomes are effective and give a clear view of the strengths and areas for development.  Pupils’ progress is monitored carefully to give a good overview of individual achievement that can be monitored from one year to the next as pupils move through the school.  Continuing professional development for teachers is well-targeted at improving science teaching, especially scientific enquiry that enhances pupils’ science skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving pupils’ skills in assessing the quality of their own science work and that of their peers  extending cross-curricular links between science and other subjects.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion