Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Grahame Sherfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Grahame Sherfield

  • Postcode verified

    GU15 4AE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Very positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyengaginggood progresswell plannedstrongimprovedsuccessfulenjoy
Criticismnot alwaysgapsnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings616w+65
  • Leadership145w+60
  • What needs to improve88w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
831
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Oddie Principal Collingwood College Kingston Road Camberley GU15 4AE

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 21 and 22 September 2011 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is good.

p.1

Achievement in history

 All groups of students, including those in the sixth form, achieve well. Those in Key Stage 3 have made consistently good progress in the last three years and GCSE students’ progress has improved and is now good. While the proportion obtaining A* to C grades is broadly average, the percentage who achieve A* to A grades has been consistently above average for several years.  The department has been successful in closing some gaps between the attainment of particular groups of students. Although girls continue to obtain more of the highest grades, an identical proportion of boys achieved A*to C grades in the 2011 GCSE examinations.  Students show a firm grasp of the importance of studying history and recognise the light this can shed on contemporary issues. As one Year 10 student put it, ‘the way everything is now is because of what’s happened in the past’. Another in Year 13 identified that ‘you see the world

p.1

Achievement in history

differently’ as a result of studying history.  Students have a good understanding of the importance of evaluating sources carefully and how and why historians might assign differing significance to events and individuals in the past. They grasp the complexity of explaining events and how causes might be analysed in different ways, for example the outbreak of the First World War involving long- and short-term factors.  History makes a good contribution to students’ personal development. They enjoy the subject and recognise the passion and commitment of their teachers. Students particularly value the opportunities to develop and contribute their own views in lessons as well as being consulted about possible improvements to their courses.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

The quality of teaching in history is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

 Lessons and sequences of lessons are well planned and teachers have a strong commitment to providing interesting, varied and engaging activities to which students respond well.  In the lessons observed, teachers’ expectations were high and they used their subject knowledge well to press students to think through and justify their ideas. Carefully chosen historical sources were often employed and learning proceeded at a brisk pace, although sometimes the links between different parts of the lessons were not always made clearly and smoothly enough.  Students appreciate the helpful comments teachers make on their work, particularly those that offer guidance on how to do better. Students on examination courses value the one-to-one discussions with staff and the support provided in setting and meeting targets for improvement.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

The quality of the curriculum in history is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 Key Stage 3 is now taught in Years 7 and 8 which has required much revision to the curriculum. This is being conducted thoughtfully and systematically. The department has correctly identified the need to ensure that progression in skills and understanding is secure as new planning is put in place and that students’ work is carefully compared and considered to support teachers in making assessments.  The department is alert to the need to ensure that Key Stage 3 provides solid foundations for students’ later study of the subject. Once new planning is in place throughout Years 7 and 8, this will require careful evaluation.  The curricula for Key Stage 4 and the sixth form meet examination requirements well and are carefully designed to ensure that students continue to benefit from varied and engaging approaches.  Students value the considerable support provided in helping them to improve their capacity to write at some length. They also benefit from a

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

good range of visits and visitors that enhances the curriculum.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 The head of department is deeply committed to history and its role in developing students’ understanding of the world around them. She works closely with her new team to ensure the effective, continuing development of the subject.  The team is enthusiastic and includes several in the early stages of their careers who benefit from the good-quality schemes of work. Plans for teachers to observe each other and share practice are at an early stage.  Self-evaluation is accurate, resulting in clear and appropriate priorities and plans for further improvement.  The progress of individual students is frequently and closely monitored and additional support or challenge provided as necessary. However, the department’s data are not routinely analysed to check the progress of groups of students, for example those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 analysing the progress made by different groups of students routinely so that factors underpinning any variations might be more readily identified and action taken  providing opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s practice as part of actions to improve the quality of teaching further.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion