Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Lyons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Lyons

  • Postcode verified

    RM8 1JT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstronghighly effectiveconsistentlywell preparedpositivewell supportedeffective
Criticismnot yetyet tolimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings678w+67
  • What needs to improve89w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
753
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr K Wilson Headteacher All Saints Catholic School and Technology College Terling Road Wood Lane Dagenham RM8 1JT

p.1

and business education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 14 and 15 September 2011 to look at work in economics and business education.

p.1

and business education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and business education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; observation of parts of eight lessons and attendance at a departmental meeting.

p.1

and business education

The overall effectiveness of economics and business education is good.

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

Achievement in economics and business education is good.

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

 In Year 11, results over the last three years have been at least in line with the national average and, in two of those years, results have been well above average. In Year 13 results are above average.  The progress of students at both Key Stage 4 and in the sixth form is consistently above average. Value-added measures show a steady increase in student progress at GCE A-level business studies so that the progress students make in this course is very good.  Currently, it is not possible to measure achievement in students’ knowledge, understanding and skills in relation to whole-school provision for economic and business understanding because the school does not yet identify the learning objectives and assess students’ progress in this area. However, discussion with students revealed that they are well prepared for employment through skills development and careers advice. Students in Key Stage 4 have less well-developed financial, economic and business

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

understanding because recent improvements in the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education programme have yet to show impact.

p.2

Quality of teaching in economics and business education

The quality of teaching in economics and business education is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in economics and business education

 The vast majority of teaching in formally assessed courses is at least good and some is outstanding. Teachers have strong subject knowledge and this gives confidence to learners. In turn, this leads to very positive relationships ensuring a good pace of work.  A wide range of teaching and learning approaches was observed including teacher-led discussion, role play and group work. A lot of good learning was developed through teacher questioning, but sometimes this focused more on recall than on challenging and stretching students’ understanding.  Students feel well supported. Teachers are approachable and marking informs students on what they need to do to improve. Subject tutorial sessions are effective but currently limited to the sixth form.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in economics and business education

The quality of the curriculum in economics and business education is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in economics and business education

 The range of formally assessed courses offered has been increased to meet the different needs of learners. Students are guided on to appropriate courses. The subject remains very popular.  There are relatively few opportunities within the formally assessed business studies courses for pupils to engage with the ‘real’ world through direct contact with employers.

p.2

business education

The effectiveness of leadership and management in economics and business education is outstanding.

p.2

business education

 Leadership brings together a diverse group of staff, several of whom have teaching and management responsibilities in other areas of the school. This is seen as an advantage and ideas and experience from outside the subject are welcomed.  Considered self-evaluation and continuing professional development have resulted in a marked improvement in achievement in recent years. This improvement and sustained strong performance in the face of considerable staffing instability, which is now resolved, is testament to the subject’s highly effective leadership and management.  The departmental leader works with the manager for personal, social and health education to improve provision for all students in enterprise. Since the last institutional inspection, good work has been done to provide a well-structured programme. It is too soon to see the impact on student achievement in this area.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 extending the opportunities for students to engage with real businesses  ensuring sufficient challenge for the most able at GCSE  identifying and assessing student outcomes in whole-school enterprise education.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop economics and business education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion