Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Angela Milner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Angela Milner

  • Postcode verified

    S44 6UN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectivehigh-qualityoutstandingwell-plannedmake good progresswell designedaccurate
Criticismweaknesseslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings781w+85
  • Leadership138w−7
  • What needs to improve160w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,056
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs R Horsley Headteacher Palterton Primary School Back Lane Palterton Chesterfield S44 6UN

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 21 September 2011 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is satisfactory with some good features in teaching and the curriculum.

p.1

Achievement in geography

Achievement in geography is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 Discussions with pupils and observations of lessons in each class show that pupils currently make satisfactory progress by the end of Key Stage 1 and good progress by the end Key Stage 2. This is because the rigour and depth of learning varies from class to class.  In Key Stage 2, pupils experience well-planned topics with a clear geographical focus and engage in sequential learning activities designed to develop skills and build their knowledge and understanding of specific places. In the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1, planning is less well focused on the precise and progressive learning activities pupils need to make good progress in their learning.  The school does not currently have a system in place to ensure that it has an accurate and moderated view of geographical attainment by the end of each Key Stage. As subject leader, you have recognised the need to improve assessment as a whole-school priority and develop a moderated

p.1

Achievement in geography

portfolio of pupils’ work linked to age-related expectations.  Inspection evidence shows that pupils demonstrate a good understanding about geography and the places they have studied by the end of Key Stage 2. They can use maps and air photographs well but there have been limited opportunities over the last two years for pupils to make use of these skills in the outdoor environment or to develop a range of fieldwork skills.  Pupils enjoy their lessons and talk enthusiastically about their work. All were engaged in appropriate activities in the lessons observed

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

The quality of teaching in geography is good overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

 Teachers motivate and engage pupils and deliver interesting and relevant lessons. During the visit outstanding, good and satisfactory teaching was observed.  In the best lessons, teachers use their subject knowledge, good explanations and effective questioning to ensure that lessons are practical, move at a good pace and that all pupils made good progress. High-quality questioning involves all pupils, and opportunities are provided for pupils to think, solve problems, look at real issues and confidently share their views and opinions. As a result they are able to ask, as well as answer, geographical questions well.  Teaching assistants are deployed effectively to support pupils in all classes.  The school has an appropriate range of geographical resources and good use is made of information and communication technology and multimedia resources in teaching and learning.  A variety of assessment strategies is in place. In lessons, teachers

p.2

Quality of teaching in geography

constantly use questioning to check on pupils’ understanding and pupils are involved in assessing their own learning. Summative assessment, in the form of ‘I can statements’, is undertaken at the end of each year but there is no evidence to show how accurate these teacher assessments are in relation to age-related expectations. Similarly, there is no evidence to indicate how well teachers’ marking helps pupils to improve their work.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

The quality of the curriculum in geography is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The curriculum for each class is well designed around a two-yearly cycle of planned geographically focused units of work and complementary cross- curricular topics. It is continually reviewed with the introduction of new and imaginative topics such as ‘From Hollywood to Bollywood’.  Schemes of work ensure that curriculum coverage is broad and balanced and provide a relevant context for learning. There is a good emphasis on the study of localities at a range of scales from local to global and pupils have opportunities to study human, physical and environmental themes in great depth.  The curriculum is matched to the range of pupils’ needs and provides good opportunities for pupils to develop their enquiry, mapwork and communication skills. You have encouraged staff to make more effective use of the outdoor learning environment and provide pupils with more opportunities to engage in fieldwork this year.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The curriculum is flexible and responsive to topical events. For example, Key Stage 2 pupils have investigated the impact of a proposed wind farm on the immediate locality and corridor displays and assemblies focus on geography in the news.  High-quality classroom displays celebrate pupils’ developing knowledge and understanding of the world by creating a real sense of the places they are studying and providing good opportunities for role play. This half term the Year 5 and 6 classroom has become an explorer ship enabling pupils to look out on a potential new colony and use their geographical knowledge and understanding to choose where they might locate their first settlement.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

The effectiveness of leadership and management in geography is currently satisfactory but there is good capacity to improve.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

 As newly appointed headteacher and subject leader you have quickly and accurately established the strengths and weaknesses of current provision.  A detailed subject action plan is in place. This provides opportunities for systematic monitoring and evaluation. There is also an appropriate emphasis on enhancing the quality of provision and accelerating the progress that pupils make in their learning.  Resources have been reviewed and updated and the school is well stocked with globes, atlases, library books and resources linked to the topics studied.  Plans are in place to join the subject association and establish links with a range of partners to enhance the quality of the curriculum and place a greater emphasis on outdoor learning and fieldwork.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 reviewing current provision to ensure that there is rigour and depth to learning in geography in each class  making more effective use of the outdoor environment to enhance learning and develop pupils’ fieldwork skills  producing an annotated portfolio of samples of pupils’ geographical work to provide:  moderated evidence of pupils’ achievement in relation to age- related expectations in the subject  good exemplars of marking and feedback which show pupils how to improve their work  monitoring the impact of the recently produced subject action plan on the quality of provision and the amount of progress pupils make in their learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion