Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Oct 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanne Olsson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joanne Olsson

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyimprovedgood progressimprovingenjoyeffectivepositiveenthusiasm
Criticismnot consistentlygapsshortcomingsweaknessesnot sufficientlyinconsistenciesnot strongnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,139
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 gail.hill@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Mrs M Beresford Headteacher St Margaret's Church of England Primary School Heys Lane Heywood Lancashire OL10 3RD

p.1

Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 21 September 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Discussions with senior leaders and managers, the Chair of the Governing Body, the pupils and local authority officers were also very helpful. Please pass on my thanks to all concerned for the time they gave to talk to me and for the welcome I received.

p.1

Primary School

Since the January 2011 inspection, a member of the senior leadership team has left the school. The leadership team has been re-structured and a new Key Stage 2 leader has taken up post. A new member of teaching staff joined the school at the beginning of the academic year. Four governors have joined the governing body. Two of these members were appointed as additional governors by the local authority and the Diocese.

p.1

Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 19 and 20 January 2011, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils' achievement.

p.1

Primary School

Pupils’ achievement improved in 2011. More pupils attained age-related expectations in English, particularly writing, and a greater proportion made expected and sometimes good progress by the end of Year 6. Since the previous inspection, most pupils made accelerated progress in reading, writing and mathematics. As a consequence, gaps in pupils’ learning are beginning to close and more pupils are making expected progress from their starting points. Although pupils’ progress is improving, unvalidated data and inspection evidence confirm pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics remains below the national average. This is because pupils’ progress across the school is not consistently strong enough to compensate for their previous underachievement. Pupils enjoy coming to school and display positive

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page2 attitudes to learning. This is reflected in their attendance levels which are steadily improving.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Pupils’ achievement in writing has improved. This is because a whole-school strategy for developing basic skills and promoting pupils’ writing has been established and is being consistently applied. Consequently, pupils now have the opportunity to learn and practise punctuation and grammar skills in a more systematic manner. Pupils are regularly using their writing skills across a range of subjects so the quality and quantity of their written work is improving. Nonetheless, some pupils, particularly those higher up in the school, still have considerable gaps in their writing and spelling skills which is preventing them from attaining age-related expectations.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Although relatively new to their posts, the subject leaders for reading and writing have quickly grasped the key barriers to pupils’ achievement in English. As a result, they have introduced whole-school targets and teaching strategies to develop pupils’ use of grammar, spelling and punctuation. In addition, they have implemented class novels and Reading Journals which encourage pupils to study and appreciate literature. Subject leaders have been involved in monitoring the impact of these strategies through scrutiny of teachers’ planning and pupils’ books. Although these monitoring activities are helping them to understand what further steps need to be taken, they do not happen on a regular enough basis to ensure that all pupils make consistently good progress.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

As a result of good quality professional development, including the opportunity for teachers to share their expertise, teaching is improving. Teachers’ planning is of better quality because it takes account of pupils’ prior learning and considers the needs of most groups. Good developments to the curriculum mean teachers provide exciting activities which spark pupils’ enthusiasm while allowing them to practise their basic skills in a variety of contexts. Nevertheless, teaching is not consistently good enough to ensure all pupils make accelerated progress. In the best lessons, teachers re-shape explanations so that all pupils are confident and work at a good pace. Every opportunity to consolidate prior learning is taken and pupils are able to work independently for sustained periods of time. Teaching is less effective when explanations are too long or when teacher expectations of what pupils can achieve are not high enough. Pupils appreciate the improvements to teaching. They say

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

learning is more fun, there are more opportunities for investigative work and they enjoy being able to write for longer periods of time.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Determined leadership by the headteacher and deputy headteacher have enabled the school to focus on the major shortcomings identified in the previous inspection report. The system to track and monitor the progress made by individual pupils is much improved and has led to greater whole-school accountability for pupils’ achievement. The monitoring of teaching is securing improvements because it accurately identifies strengths and weaknesses. However, this is not sufficiently rigorous enough to address remaining inconsistencies and secure greater gains in pupils’ achievement.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page3 The local authority’s statement of action has been evaluated and it meets requirements. The support provided by the local authority has been concerted and effective. Local authority officers have delivered whole-school and targeted individual support to improve the school’s provision for writing and to raise the quality of teaching. In addition, local authority guidance has supported senior leaders and mangers in establishing stronger systems for monitoring the work of the school. The school has also benefitted from support provided by the Diocese. Effective governor training has enabled members of the governing body to offer a greater level of support and challenge.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I hope you have found this visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Miss Joanne Olsson Her Majesty's Inspector

p.3

19 and 20 January 2011

 Improve the consistency of pupils’ attainment and progress in writing by: - implementing a more structure approach to the teaching of writing - ensuring that all pupils, particularly those lower down I the school, improve their skills in punctuation and sentence structure - ensuring that all pupils are given a wide range of opportunities to apply their writing skills - giving more attention to the management of writing especially in evaluating the impact of changes and making adjustments to provision.

p.4

19 and 20 January 2011

 Improve the quality of teaching to be consistently good across the school by: - sharing the good practice that is evident in Year 4 to Year 6 - ensuring that teaching builds securely on pupils’ prior learning - providing pupils with sufficient opportunities to apply their learning through independent investigations - ensuring that planning consistently meets the needs of all pupils.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion