Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Chambers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Chambers

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedgood progressmake good progressconsistentpositivesuccessfulaccuratelyimproving
Criticismweakerlowyet tonot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
832
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mr T Eastaugh Headteacher Spen Valley Sports College Roberttown Lane Liversedge West Yorkshire WF15 7LX

p.1

Sports College

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on Thursday 15 September 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussion and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection.

p.1

Sports College

As a result of the inspection on Thursday 24 June 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Sports College

Although it remains broadly average, students’ attainment has risen substantially. For example, at the time of the last inspection, 37% of students gained five good GCSE passes including English and mathematics; the unvalidated results for 2011 indicate over 50% will achieve the same measure. Over the same period, results in English and mathematics have each risen by approximately 10 percentage points. However, not all results have followed a consistent upward trend: for example, in 2010, the English results went down before rising in 2011. The school’s monitoring indicates that the improved results in 2011 can be maintained even where the cohort of students has weaker attainment on entry.

p.1

Sports College

Measures of students’ progress have improved. However, this is not a consistent picture: for example, while the proportion of students making the expected progress in mathematics has risen, improvements are less evident in English. The school has correctly identified that more girls than boys make the expected progress, particularly in English, and have appropriate plans in place to address this. Overall results show that students continue to make good progress in vocational subjects, including those relating to the school’s specialisms. January 2011

p.1

Sports College

Page2 School records show that more lessons are good or better than at the time of the last inspection and this is supported by evidence gathered during the inspection. A positive and consistent approach to managing behaviour has contributed to students’ improved attitudes and progress. In the more successful lessons, teachers select a range of classroom activities that promote discussion and engage students in their learning; they use questioning to probe students’ understanding and plan for different abilities within the class. In the weaker lessons, not all students are sufficiently challenged and some rely too much on teacher guidance. Low levels of literacy continue to be a barrier to learning for a minority of students. The school has made a start in strengthening the development of literacy across the curriculum through staff training and planning, but the full impact of these actions has yet to be realised. Plans for developing numeracy skills more systematically are at an early

p.2

Sports College

Leaders and managers have a realistic view of the school and were able to estimate accurately the school’s GCSE results in 2011. Improvement plans have an appropriate focus on improving outcomes for students. Management actions have been particularly effective in improving attendance. Overall attendance figures rose from low in 2010 to broadly average in 2011; moreover, 2011 saw an impressive drop in the proportion of students who are persistent absentees. Leaders appreciate the importance of maintaining these higher attendance figures.

p.2

Sports College

Leaders and managers have successfully deployed additional resources that have contributed to higher attainment in English and mathematics. In English, a new curriculum leader, a full complement of staff, closer tracking of progress and personalised support have all played a part in raising standards. Additional links with other local schools are helping staff to share good practice and benchmark their provision against that in other schools.

p.2

Sports College

GCSE results in the school’s specialist subjects are among the best in the school. Courses offered lead to a broad range of qualifications and teachers from the specialist curriculum areas contribute to leading whole-school developments in teaching and learning.

p.2

Sports College

Staff from the local authority, including the School Improvement Partner, have supported the development of capacity within the school well. Support for mathematics and science has been good; support for English has been less consistent.

p.2

Sports College

Inspectors found no evidence of any weakness in the school’s safeguarding procedures.

p.2

Sports College

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Thursday 24 June 2010

 Raise attainment in English and mathematics by:  prioritising the development of literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum  raising teachers’ expectations of what students can understand and achieve.

p.3

Thursday 24 June 2010

 Increase the proportion of good and better lessons by ensuring that:  they seek to interest and challenge students  work is accurately matched to the needs of all students  students are engaged in their learning  marking clearly indicates how students can improve their work.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion