Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carole Skinner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carole Skinner

  • Postcode verified

    ME5 0NF

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve76w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
109
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 77%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Williams Headteacher St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School Bleakwood Road Chatham Kent ME5 0NF

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 4 May 2011 to look at your work in mathematics, with a particular focus on arithmetic.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting as well as wider dissemination of good practice. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

Evidence was collected through: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Insightful leadership is informed by excellent subject knowledge and understanding of how pupils learn. The school’s philosophy is firmly focused on developing a deep understanding of processes, rather than just solving problems and getting the right answer. As a result, pupils have no fear of ‘getting it wrong’ as this is accepted as part of learning.  Progression in learning is assured by consistent approaches to teaching arithmetic throughout the school, based on rigorous planning within each year group and clear guidance for teachers and learning support assistants.  Very effective daily teaching of mental and oral strategies reinforces pupils’ confidence and competence in handling numbers and understanding concepts such as inverse operations and divisibility rules.  Throughout the school, pupils enjoy a wide variety of activities where they learn, use and apply mathematics in interesting and meaningful everyday

p.1

Features of good practice

contexts. Teachers also make effective links with other subjects, for example when ‘Winnie the Witch’, previously encountered in a literacy lesson, visited Year 2 pupils and asked them to help her share and group skulls, newts’ eyes and lizards for her spells.  The correct use of mathematical vocabulary is given high profile throughout the school and this enables pupils to develop good understanding of key concepts and fluency in explaining their learning.  Learning is greatly enhanced by numerous opportunities for pupils to discuss and explain their reasoning and chosen strategies, both with ‘talking partners’ and in whole-class sessions.  Pupils thoroughly enjoy mathematics lessons. They participate with enthusiasm, are keen to offer ideas and demonstrate quickness of thought, flexibility in tackling problems and persistence when faced with tricky calculations.

p.1

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing more consistent approaches to marking pupils’ work and involving pupils in assessing their own progress.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at St Thomas More RC Primary School.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion