Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    SK5 8AR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve104w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
136
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 21%About the inspection 72%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M O’Brien Headteacher St Bernadette’s Catholic Primary School Gorseway, off Foliage Rd Brinnington Stockport SK5 8AR

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 good practice study: primary mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 5 May 2011 to look at your work in mathematics, with a particular focus on arithmetic.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 good practice study: primary mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting as well as wider dissemination of good practice. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 good practice study: primary mathematics

Evidence was gathered through interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons and five part lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Outstanding leadership and management are reflected in the rigorous evaluation of teaching and learning and the exceptionally high staff commitment towards improvement. These factors lie at the heart of pupils’ excellent achievement in developing confidence and fluency in arithmetic and problem solving.  The very carefully structured curriculum ensures that pupils develop the skills of arithmetic systematically and acquire a clear understanding of the value and application of different methods of calculation, leading to a secure grasp of standard algorithms.  The quality of teaching is often outstanding, particularly the effectiveness with which teachers explain, model and illustrate mathematical operations. The high level of challenge in lessons and the accurate match of work to pupils’ different levels of understanding, enable all of them to learn successfully.  Teachers use a wide variety of stimulating approaches, including games

p.1

Features of good practice

and practical activities, which pupils find interesting and engaging. As a result, they are highly motivated to learn.  The school’s highly effective approaches to assessing learning, tracking progress, setting targets and providing support through intervention, ensure that teachers, teaching assistants and pupils understand the levels attained and what needs to be done to reach the next stage.  Careful nurturing of children’s calculation skills in the Early Years Foundation Stage and developing their understanding of crucial concepts, such as place value and inverse operations in Key Stages 1 and 2 enable pupils to work flexibly, select methods appropriately and solve problems logically by the time they reach Year 6.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making greater use of approximating and estimating, as a precursor to calculating, to help pupils to gauge the reasonability of their answers  developing pupils’ understanding of long division further, for those in Years 5 and 6, who are ready to calculate using larger numbers.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at St Bernadette’s Catholic Primary School.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion