Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Colin Smith
- Postcode verified
M33 4GY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at St Margaret Ward Catholic Primary School. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 129
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr A Ratchford Headteacher St Margaret Ward Catholic Primary School Cherry Lane Sale Cheshire M33 4GY
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 18 May 2011 to look at your work in mathematics, with a particular focus on arithmetic.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting as well as wider dissemination of good practice. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics
Evidence was collected through: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons and parts of five lessons.
p.1
Features of good practice
Outstanding leadership and management are characterised by setting challenging targets and monitoring pupils’ progress towards them. Any gaps in pupils’ calculation skills and understanding are quickly identified and promptly remedied by well-targeted intervention. Good provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage is reflected in the stimulating learning environment and carefully structured learning through play. Children are well supported by whole-class and small-group practical activities, which promote the strong development of mental strategies and calculation skills. Outstanding teaching is evident in the high level of challenge and rapid pace of learning in lessons. The use of interactive whiteboards, computers and practical equipment makes a significant contribution to pupils’ understanding of the relationships between numbers, such as place value and partitioning. Assessment is used particularly well in lessons to evaluate pupils’
p.1
Features of good practice
understanding. Teachers’ astute questioning, prompting pupils to explain their reasoning and checking the answers they have written on mini- whiteboards, enables any misconceptions to be remedied immediately. The provision of clear learning objectives and individual targets ensures that pupils know what they are expected to learn. Constructive feedback, self-assessment and analytical marking of pupils’ work ensure that they know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve. Pupils’ learning of mathematics is fun and enjoyable in key stages 1 and 2. Pupils play mathematical games, investigate numbers and shape and become fully engaged in quick-fire question and answer sessions with their teachers. As a result, they develop an interest in the subject, behave extremely well in lessons and take great pride in their work. The broad and well-structured mathematics curriculum provided enables
p.2
Features of good practice
pupils to build their calculation skills systematically and use and apply them in purposeful and meaningful problem-solving situations.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
making greater to use of estimation and approximation to help pupils to judge whether their answers are close to those expected and using their good knowledge of inverse operations, regularly, to check results and eliminate calculation errors.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at St Margaret Ward Catholic Primary School.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion