Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    M33 4GY

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings33w0
  • What needs to improve97w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
129
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Ratchford Headteacher St Margaret Ward Catholic Primary School Cherry Lane Sale Cheshire M33 4GY

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 18 May 2011 to look at your work in mathematics, with a particular focus on arithmetic.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting as well as wider dissemination of good practice. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 good practice survey: primary mathematics

Evidence was collected through: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons and parts of five lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Outstanding leadership and management are characterised by setting challenging targets and monitoring pupils’ progress towards them. Any gaps in pupils’ calculation skills and understanding are quickly identified and promptly remedied by well-targeted intervention.  Good provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage is reflected in the stimulating learning environment and carefully structured learning through play. Children are well supported by whole-class and small-group practical activities, which promote the strong development of mental strategies and calculation skills.  Outstanding teaching is evident in the high level of challenge and rapid pace of learning in lessons. The use of interactive whiteboards, computers and practical equipment makes a significant contribution to pupils’ understanding of the relationships between numbers, such as place value and partitioning.  Assessment is used particularly well in lessons to evaluate pupils’

p.1

Features of good practice

understanding. Teachers’ astute questioning, prompting pupils to explain their reasoning and checking the answers they have written on mini- whiteboards, enables any misconceptions to be remedied immediately.  The provision of clear learning objectives and individual targets ensures that pupils know what they are expected to learn. Constructive feedback, self-assessment and analytical marking of pupils’ work ensure that they know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve.  Pupils’ learning of mathematics is fun and enjoyable in key stages 1 and 2. Pupils play mathematical games, investigate numbers and shape and become fully engaged in quick-fire question and answer sessions with their teachers. As a result, they develop an interest in the subject, behave extremely well in lessons and take great pride in their work.  The broad and well-structured mathematics curriculum provided enables

p.2

Features of good practice

pupils to build their calculation skills systematically and use and apply them in purposeful and meaningful problem-solving situations.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making greater to use of estimation and approximation to help pupils to judge whether their answers are close to those expected and using their good knowledge of inverse operations, regularly, to check results and eliminate calculation errors.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at St Margaret Ward Catholic Primary School.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion