Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Armitage

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Armitage

  • Postcode verified

    RG6 4HQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingenthusiasticmake good progressstrongpositiveeffectiveclearkeen
Criticisminsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings339w+58
  • Leadership95w+68
  • What needs to improve99w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
518
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs K Gauld Headteacher Hillside Primary School Rushey Way Reading RG6 4HQ

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 June 2011 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, pupils and parents; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and six lesson observations.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in history

 Overall, standards are average and pupils make satisfactory progress. Progress in lessons observed ranged from satisfactory to good, and some pupils make outstanding progress.  Pupils are very enthusiastic about the subject and are able to recall the work that they have done. For example, Year 2 pupils spoke about the Great Fire and Pepys’ reflections upon it.  Pupils’ personal development is good. In discussion, younger pupils understood the implications of the use of child labour in coal mines during the Industrial Revolution and older pupils were very clear about the achievements of Nelson Mandela.

p.1

Quality of teaching in history

The quality of teaching in history is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

 Teachers are enthusiastic and have a good knowledge of the topics they teach. They are keen for pupils to do well and this is acknowledged by the pupils. Classroom management is good and pupils’ behaviour is outstanding.  Teachers have changed the way they teach to enable pupils to take more responsibility for their own learning. Pupils are encouraged to pose more questions and to research answers. This is having a positive effect but lessons are still too structured around issues identified by teachers.  Lessons are generally pitched at a level suitable for most, but not all, pupils. As a result, some pupils do not make sufficient progress.  Teachers give insufficient attention to ensuring progression year-by-year in the teaching of historical knowledge, understanding and skills. This adversely affects pupils’ progress.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

The quality of the curriculum in history is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 The curriculum covers the National Curriculum and also develops good links with other subjects. It is relevant to pupils because links are made to contemporary issues affecting their lives.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are given good opportunities to study history-related topics.  There are a good number of visits and visitors to school covering issues of historical interest.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 There is recent, effective self-evaluation of the subject and this is beginning to have good impact. It has led to the development of an interesting, new curriculum to begin in September 2011.  There have also been recent changes in teaching styles as well as good, ongoing improvements in assessment including tracking. These have been developed to support improvements in standards and to help pupils make good progress in the subject. There is strong evidence that the innovations are already beginning to do this.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 further refinement of the assessment system to support improvements in achievement  monitoring teaching to ensure that it provides progression in pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding  ensuring that teaching meets the needs of all pupils.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion