Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Sept 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Phillips

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Phillips

  • Postcode verified

    E18 2RB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingstrongvery wellvery effectivegood progressextremelyconsistently
Criticisminconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings725w+80
  • Leadership237w+88
  • What needs to improve125w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,070
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms W Thomas Headteacher Churchfields Junior School South Woodford London E18 2RB

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 12 July 2011 to look at work in music.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The evidence used to inform the judgements included : i nterviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of three class music lessons; observation of a Year 4 singing session and a rehearsal of the school orchestra; and a dress rehearsal for the Year 6 end-of-term performance.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: music

The overall effectiveness of music is good with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement in music

 Standards in music are firmly above average throughout the school, representing good progress for all groups of pupils given their generally above-average prior attainment when they join in Year 3. A key reason why pupils do well is because of the consistently good quality of classroom provision in playing instruments and creating musical ideas. Melodic and rhythmic understanding is developed securely through listening to music by established composers and then improvising around patterns taken from these pieces. The range of musical styles selected for this work is reasonably varied, but pupils are right to say that more emphasis could be given to contemporary musical styles to help broaden their cultural understanding.  Singing is also developed well with standards securely above average including strong part singing featuring in all year groups. Tone quality, diction and phrasing are usually very good.

p.1

Achievement in music

 Good numbers of pupils benefit from additional instrumental tuition and participation in regular extra-curricular music activities. The choir is well- established, although numbers have dipped recently. Involvement in music does much to raise the self-esteem of individual pupils and the school as a whole. All groups are represented, although it is noticeable that boys are not as well-represented as girls in extra-curricular musical activities.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

The quality of teaching in music is good, with outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

 Class music lessons have a clear focus on improving musical understanding through a coordinated approach to developing pupils’ aural perception and performing skills. Well-structured tasks encourage them to show this understanding through guided improvisation. For example, in a Year 6 lesson, pupils listened carefully to an extract from Prokofiev’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and were able to identify the use of minor arpeggios and dotted rhythms. Stave notation and mnemonics were used appropriately to underpin pupils’ aural understanding. They then used the two ideas to invent their own short group pieces, each based on a different minor chord. To conclude, the teacher drew all the group pieces together to form a longer class composition, with great success.  While these activities are very effective, too much time is spent in verbal exposition at the start of class music lessons, before pupils engage in practical music-making. A greater proportion of lesson time engaged with

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

musical language would help pupils to make outstanding progress, because they would be able to develop their ideas in greater depth.  The regular whole-year group singing lessons are led very well by the local authority Advanced Skills Teacher (AST). These sessions are underpinned by excellent musical pedagogy, including use of tonic-sol-fa which is understood very well by pupils. Although it is encouraging that class teachers support these sessions, their participation is inconsistent. Their more active involvement would help improve pupils’ participation and achieve consistent standards across all singing activities.  Regular audio recordings are made of pupils’ work. There is some use of information and communication technology (ICT) in Year 6, but this aspect of teaching is not well developed.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

The quality of the curriculum in music is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

 The classroom curriculum single-page overview gives an excellent insight into how pupils are expected to progress in their musical understanding from Years 3 to 6, with previous learning from Year 2 also clearly identified. This is supported by more detailed planning which shows how different activities link together to promote progression. However, less attention is given to how the advanced skills of pupils who receive additional tuition might be extended through class work, and this is a key area for development.  Although class music lessons with the music coordinator are rotated on a half-termly basis, each year group meets together on a weekly basis for singing practice and each class also benefits from drumming workshops, as part of the ‘Wider Opportunities’ initiative. This programme is enabled through the school’s own finances, rather than through the government’s standards funding for music.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

 Well-established partnerships with the local authority music and school improvement services enable pupils to benefit from good programmes of additional tuition and a good range of extra-curricular activities. The school orchestra is a good size and performs to a good standard; the school plays a leading role in local music events and concerts.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

The effectiveness of leadership and management in music is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

 The music coordinator is extremely well informed about issues in music education. She has taken advantage of a range of training opportunities, including through ‘Sing Up!’ (the national singing strategy) and other pedagogical approaches, such as Dalcroze Eurythmics, and these approaches are used effectively in teaching.  Equally strong leadership is provided for the weekly singing practices and the school orchestra rehearsals by the AST, who provides further links to networks such as the National Association of Music Educators (NAME). Other adults contribute well to the musical life of the school, including the Site Supervisor who runs a small popular music band.  Self-evaluation is excellent. Prior to the inspection, you accurately judged the overall quality of provision as good; the music development plan shows precisely what needs to be done to enable outstanding outcomes for pupils. Governors are very supportive of music, including through the

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

provision of additional funding for music.  With the music coordinator leaving the school at the end of this term, you have appointed an experienced replacement. However, the success of music at Churchfields is not dependent on one person. The depth of provision and leadership; strong commitment to continuity and succession planning; the quality of self-evaluation and, not least, the good abilities and attitudes of pupils, give confidence in the school’s capacity to bring about further sustained improvements in music.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 encouraging and enabling class teachers to take a more active role in the weekly singing sessions  planning greater levels of challenge for more able pupils in class music lessons, including for those who benefit from additional instrumental tuition  ensuring that maximum use is made of lesson time for active music- making and listening, minimising the time spent on verbal explanations.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop music in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion