Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Guy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Guy

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedclearstrongeffectiveenjoypositivesuccessfullyimproving
Criticismdeclinedweakerdeclineyet tovariablenot consistentlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
881
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 937 Direct F 01695 729320 jsimmons@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mrs C Cope Headteacher Christ Church CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge Park Road Sowerby Bridge West Yorkshire HX6 2BJ

p.1

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 14 July 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions, planning meeting and for the information which you and your senior leadership team provided during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the Chair of the Governing Body, the School Improvement Partner and the group of pupils who took time to speak with me.

p.1

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

As a result of the inspection on 4 March 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

In 2010 attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 in mathematics improved to be broadly in line with the national average and was above the school’s target. However, attainment in English declined to below the national average. Early unvalidated results of the 2011 national Key Stage 2 tests show that attainment in mathematics has been sustained and the proportion of pupils achieving the higher levels has improved. However, attainment in English has continued to decline. Although pupils’ attainment in reading is broadly in line with the national average, performance in writing is weaker and the school has acknowledged this as an area requiring concerted improvement.

p.1

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

The overall quality of teaching and learning has improved since the last inspection and the teaching seen in lessons was good. Lessons have clear learning objectives and criteria for achieving success which are shared with pupils. Where this is most effective pupils are involved in shaping and developing these as the lesson progresses, helping them to use and apply their skills in new areas of learning. However, the use of success criteria is still developing and teachers and pupils do not refer to these enough during lessons to check whether they are being met. January 2011

p.1

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

Page2 Pupils are well engaged in lessons and are motivated to learn. They enjoy educational visits and practical activities which help them apply their learning. For example, they particularly enjoyed flying kites they had made as part of a science lesson on forces. Pupils’ behaviour makes a strong contribution to their learning. They cooperate well and talk and share ideas purposefully and sensibly. The progress seen in lessons indicates an improving picture; however, this is yet to be demonstrated consistently in the school’s data. Guidance given to pupils to improve their basic skills is positive. However, marking of pupils’ work and written feedback on the next steps pupils need to take is variable. The school acknowledges this is an area for further improvement and is identified in the school improvement planning.

p.2

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

The school has worked successfully to ensure that all teachers have a secure understanding of the features of good teaching and learning. All staff contribute to the monitoring of the school’s work, for example, in planning and support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Presently, only the headteacher observes lessons. However, the school acknowledges that improvement planning needs to be further developed by ensuring that sharper measurable criteria are used to aid accountability and challenge from the governing body. Systems for tracking pupils’ progress and monitoring the quality of teaching are becoming embedded but incisive evaluation of this information is an area for further development.

p.2

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

Support and monitoring by the School Improvement Partner has identified correctly the areas in which the school has made progress and those that require further improvement. School leaders and members of the governing body are aware of the need to review their priorities in the light of the school’s recent Key Stage 2 results for writing.

p.2

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

The school is developing the role of leaders and has recently appointed a deputy headteacher. Together with partnerships being established with other local schools, this is enabling the school to increase its capacity to improve further and support the headteacher’s drive for further improvement.

p.2

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

CofE VA Junior School, Sowerby Bridge

Mr Adrian Guy Her Majesty's Inspector January 2011

p.2

March 2010

 Improve the quality of teaching and use of assessment in order to accelerate pupils' progress by: - making certain that all lessons have precise and appropriate learning objectives and clear criteria to achieve success - ensuring that all lessons motivate pupils and encourage them to use and apply their skills and knowledge providing clear strategies and guidance for pupils to improve their basic skills throughout all their work.

p.3

March 2010

 Improve the planning for the school's future improvement by:

p.3

March 2010

- establishing clear criteria for the best practice in all major areas of the school's work, especially the quality of teaching and learning

p.3

March 2010

- involving staff at all levels in efficiently and rigorously monitoring and evaluating the school's work in order to achieve the agreed criteria

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion