Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Daniel Burton
- Postcode verified
SW18 5JP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils report that they enjoy history very much, and appreciate the excellent provision for enrichment. p.2
- History makes an excellent contribution to pupils’ personal development. p.1
- Teachers’ enthusiasm for history is reflected in high levels of pupils’ enjoyment in lessons. p.2
- The curriculum is enriched by an outstanding programme of extra- curricular activities. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. p.3
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 824
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Miss C Piombo Headteacher Riverside Primary School 302a Merton Road London SW18 5JP
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 20 June 2011 to look at work in history.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of three lessons.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: history
The overall effectiveness of history is good.
p.1
Achievement in history
From their varied starting points, pupils make good progress in history so that their attainment by the end of Year 6 is broadly average. Pupils develop good knowledge and understanding of topics studied in depth. Their good sense of period is deepened through valuable and well- coordinated opportunities for cross-curricular working. Older pupils have a good understanding of how different periods of history fit together. Less secure is their understanding of the time differences between different periods and events in history. As a result, their mental map of the past is sometimes a little confused. Pupils’ skills in historical enquiry are good. They benefit from opportunities to ask their own questions about the past and to reflect on what they have learnt, for example, in their studies of Ancient Egypt or the Tudors. History makes an excellent contribution to pupils’ personal development.
p.1
Achievement in history
Pupils report that they enjoy history very much, and appreciate the excellent provision for enrichment. Pupils behave well in lessons and work very effectively in groups. Sometimes, when the introductory sessions led by the teacher go on for too long, pupils’ attention begins to wane and they become less attentive.
p.2
Quality of teaching in history
The quality of teaching in history is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching in history
Teachers’ enthusiasm for history is reflected in high levels of pupils’ enjoyment in lessons. Good opportunities are provided to develop pupils’ skills as independent and collaborative learners. Teachers use their good understanding of pupils’ prior attainment in literacy to plan learning activities which generally meet the needs and abilities of different pupils well. Effective use is made of additional staff to support and challenge those who need additional help. While lessons are often characterised by the use of well-conceived and challenging enquiry questions, learning materials are not always sufficiently well designed to secure the high-quality thinking the teaching is trying to encourage. In other lessons, opportunities are sometimes missed to pose challenging and controversial questions to stimulate argument and debate. Teachers’ marking is completed regularly and conscientiously. However, it
p.2
Quality of teaching in history
is not fully effective in helping teachers and pupils to identify precisely how well pupils are doing in the development of their subject-specific skills or how to improve in history.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
The quality of the curriculum in history is good.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
The curriculum is enriched by an outstanding programme of extra- curricular activities. Pupils benefit from wide-ranging opportunities to visit places of historical interest and importance, including Hampton Court Palace, the Britain at War Museum and the British Museum. Visits are timed to coincide extremely well with pupils’ study of the past. Good links have been forged with the Wandsworth Museum to build pupils’ enjoyment and understanding in history. For example, in a Year 1 lesson, pupils enjoyed playing with Tudor and Victorian toys provided by the museum as they considered how toys have changed over time. The curriculum is enhanced by high-quality cross-curricular links, particularly in literacy and art and design. For example, pupils’ understanding of Aztec beliefs and customs is enhanced very significantly through their work to design authentic Aztec clay bowls. Planning for progression in historical knowledge, understanding and skills
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
is underdeveloped. This inhibits teachers’ and pupils’ understanding of how pupils might be expected to make progress over time in history.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is good.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The subject is well led by a committed team of staff who are using their growing expertise well to strengthen provision in history, for example through sharing lesson ideas with other teachers. Leaders and managers have correctly identified that planning for progression in history is not sufficiently well developed. They are currently designing a curriculum map which will strengthen teachers’ understanding of progression in the development of pupils’ subject-specific skills. Systems to monitor pupils’ attainment have been revised since September to improve teachers’ understanding of how well pupils are doing in history. Plans are in place to strengthen these further for September to ensure that the school’s understanding of pupils’ attainment in history is more robust.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
strengthen planning for pupil progression in the development of subject- specific knowledge, skills and understanding in history, to ensure that: teachers and pupils are able to articulate clearly what pupils need to do to make progress in history marking and assessment are focused sharply on the development of history-specific knowledge, skills and understanding all staff, including leaders and managers, have a clear understanding of how well pupils are attaining in history, in lessons and over time.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion