Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Massey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Massey

  • Postcode verified

    HA3 9UD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentconfidentexceptionalvery effectivewell plannedstrongsafesupportive
Criticismlimitednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings588w+77
  • Leadership117w+76
  • What needs to improve93w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
779
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs V Orloff Headteacher Michael Sobell Sinai School Shakespeare Drive Kenton Harrow HA3 9UD

p.1

social, and health education (PSHE)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 23 May 2011 to look at work in PSHE.

p.1

social, and health education (PSHE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

social, and health education (PSHE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and Year 6 pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four lessons and an assembly.

p.1

social, and health education (PSHE)

The overall effectiveness of PSHE is good.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE

 Pupils have an excellent understanding of what constitutes a healthy diet. They understand which foods to eat and which to avoid and the reasons for these choices.  Pupils understand the importance of regular exercise for their physical and mental health. A high proportion of pupils takes up the many opportunities for sport provided in school.  Pupils have an excellent understanding of how to assess and reduce risk to keep themselves safe both in and outside school. They know how to keep safe on the internet and have strategies to help them resist peer pressure.  Pupils are confident to talk to adults if they have a problem and understand why bullying is wrong and how to prevent it.  Pupils’ understanding of sex and relationships is very limited. They have an age-related understanding of the misuse of substances, such as alcohol and tobacco.  The wide range of opportunities for fundraising and special events helps

p.1

Achievement in PSHE

pupils to develop financial awareness. They demonstrate great understanding of others’ needs.  Pupils’ personal development is exceptional. They are confident and very articulate. They are supportive of one another and work cooperatively. Links with neighbouring schools, developed through the school council, have encouraged them to find out about and appreciate other cultures and religions.

p.2

Quality of teaching of PSHE

The quality of teaching of PSHE is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching of PSHE

 Teachers show good subject knowledge. Relationships in lesson are very positive and pupils feel confident to contribute and ask questions. They are aware of what they are learning and are given the opportunity check their understanding with one another.  Lessons are well planned and allow all pupils to make progress. Opportunities are provided for pupils to discuss their work with one another.  High levels of care, support and guidance contribute to pupils’ achievement. Teaching assistants are used effectively to support those who find learning more difficult.  Pupils’ progress is assessed in lessons where there is content that is linked to another subject, but there is otherwise no formal system of assessment for PSHE.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PSHE

The quality of the curriculum in PSHE is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PSHE

 The PSHE curriculum is embedded across the whole school through discrete lessons, assemblies, cross-curricular themes and special events, such as visits from the police and a theatre company. Schemes of work are in place but do not show clear progression to ensure full coverage of the curriculum throughout Key Stage 2.  A very wide range of extra-curricular activities supports the curriculum well and makes learning more interesting.  Well-targeted support for pupils whose circumstances make them more vulnerable gives them confidence and enables them to be fully involved in all the same activities as their peers, particularly in being able to take responsibility.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE

The effectiveness of leadership and management of PSHE is good.  PSHE has a high priority for the school’s leaders and is well supported by the school’s religious principles and values. The senior leader with responsibility for PSHE is well informed about current developments in the subject.  The development of pupils’ personal skills is well embedded in the school’s ethos. A strong focus on including all pupils is evident in the way in which provision is organised and in the very effective support for individuals.  The school’s self-evaluation is accurate. Systems for monitoring and evaluating the quality of the school’s provision are thorough and lead to regular improvements. Action planning is thorough and well targeted.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that there is clear progression in all PSHE education topics throughout Key stage 2  developing more robust systems for monitoring and assessing pupils’ progress in PSHE education.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion