Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Christine Jones
- Postcode verified
BN8 6EQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics2
“Pupils’ work books are marked regularly.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 710
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs A Hill Headteacher East Hoathly CofE Primary School Church Marks Lane East Hoathly Lewes BN8 6EQ
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 23 May 2011 to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons.
p.1
Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: science
The overall effectiveness of science is satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement in science
By the end of Year 6, most pupils reach the expected Level 4 and make satisfactory progress. Fewer pupils than average reach the higher Level 5 and the achievement of girls is better than that of boys. Achievement is improving as there is a greater focus on teaching science through practical activities. In Year 2, pupils typically reach the level expected of their age. The progress they make is also improving with the emphasis on hands-on learning opportunities. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress due to the good support they receive. Pupils’ understanding of scientific concepts is developing well. Their investigative skills are also improving and they are confident in following instructions. They are good at working together and organising themselves in group work. Behaviour in lessons is excellent. Pupils have very good attitudes to learning and are keen to take part in exciting activities. They are ready to
p.1
Achievement in science
voice their opinions and give their answers, encouraged by teachers’ careful use of probing questions.
p.2
Quality of teaching in science
The quality of teaching in science is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching in science
Teaching is improving as lesson planning moves towards a more creative approach that emphasises practical and investigative activities that are more interesting and relevant to the pupils’ needs. Relationships between teachers and pupils are good and create a positive climate for learning environment in the classroom. Teachers always share with pupils what they will be learning in the lessons. These learning intentions are sometimes too general and not focused enough on specific science concepts. Consequently, pupils often find it difficult to show what they have understood and learnt in the lesson. In addition, these lessons do not always address underlying misconceptions in pupils’ understanding of scientific concepts. Teachers use information and communication technology (ICT) well in their lessons and pupils make appropriate use of computers to help with their learning. Pupils’ work books are marked regularly. Marking in some pupils’ books is
p.2
Quality of teaching in science
not sufficiently diagnostic and does not give enough detail on the standard of the work and how it could be improved. Learning is well supported by the teaching assistants who are valued members of the teaching team.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in science
The quality of the curriculum in science is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in science
The curriculum is adapted from the former Qualifications and Curriculum Authority schemes of work linked with the overarching topics that have been chosen as the basis for the school curriculum as a whole. The school curriculum is mapped out carefully every year to allow for the work in the mixed-age classes to be planned and eliminate repetition. Within that map, the individual science topics are often linked with other subjects, such as art or design and technology. The Early Years Foundation Stage gives children many good opportunities to develop their knowledge and understanding of the world through exploration and play. The school organises a variety of different external trips and visits, with science often forming an important element of these outings.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
The effectiveness of leadership and management in science are satisfactory.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
The subject is effectively led with a good emphasis on maintaining an investigative approach to science. You and the subject coordinator have a clear vision for developing the quality of science education across the school. The subject coordinator is working hard to raise the profile of science although this has to be in the context of leading five other subject areas as well. You are putting into place effective monitoring and reviewing of provision and are developing the coordinator’s role in this.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
sharpening the focus of learning intentions for science sessions so that pupils can show what they have understood and learnt developing the quality of assessment of pupils’ work so that they know the standards they are reaching and how to improve.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion