Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Brown

  • Postcode verified

    L30 2NA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery welloutstandingexcellent relationshipshigh expectationshigh-qualitymake good progressgood progress
Criticismnot alwaysbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings581w+78
  • Leadership157w+87
  • What needs to improve129w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
849
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Father J G Briody Headteacher Savio Salesian College Netherton Way Bootle Merseyside L30 2NA

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 12 and 13 May 2011 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight lessons including two observed jointly with a member of the senior leadership team.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Students begin in Year 7 with levels of attainment which are slightly below the national average. All students study ICT until the end of Year 11 and take a qualification. By the end of year 11, they are achieving above national averages.  Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported very well and have excellent access to facilities. High-quality support means that these students make good progress.  Students behave well in lessons. They listen to each other and work well either in groups or independently. The excellent relationships between staff and students when using ICT support good progress in lessons.  Students are supported to learn how to become safe and responsible users of new technologies through tutor time and assemblies, at times led by the on-site safer schools police officer.

p.1

Quality of teaching in ICT

 Teachers plan lessons which engage and motivate students. Staff have good subject knowledge and are confident users of ICT. They have high expectations of the students.  Teachers form very positive working relationships, which challenge and engage students in their learning.  The assessment of work in lessons is excellent and is used effectively to target interventions with students who underachieve. Students are aware of their progress and know what they need to do to improve their work.  The use of ICT to support learning across the school is good and improving. Students have very good access to ICT and it is used appropriately in many lessons to develop their learning, although progress in ICT across the curriculum is not monitored.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 All students at Key Stages 3 and 4 receive their entitlement to the statutory ICT National Curriculum during ICT lessons. The curriculum is planned well and reviewed regularly and has been updated to make it more interesting and enjoyable. The college has recently introduced a gaming skills course in Year 9 to increase the challenge for students.  The college recognises that the curriculum provided at Key Stage 4 does not always challenge the most able students and has plans to introduce more appropriate accreditation for these students.  The college has well-developed plans to replace the current virtual learning environment (VLE) to enable better access for students.  Students have access to very high quality opportunities to use ICT in other curriculum areas. Opportunities to use their skills in a number of enterprise activities, several of which have won national recognition, demonstrate what some students can achieve. However, this work is not currently

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

monitored or assessed, and some students are receiving broader experiences in ICT than others.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

The effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT is outstanding.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

 ICT is led very well at both departmental and senior management levels. Significant progress to improve the outcomes for all students in ICT has been made in the last three years. The leadership team has a clear and shared understanding of both strengths and areas for further development. The standard of self-review and evaluation is outstanding. Members of the governing body are actively involved in monitoring the progress of students in ICT and in ensuring that it provides value for money.  Access to ICT equipment in the college is excellent. The college provides regular opportunities for student support at lunchtime clubs and Easter revision sessions, and has further plans to offer access at the breakfast club.  The use of data to raise standards and improve provision is excellent. The use of targeted interventions and additional support is having a significant impact on students’ achievement.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the quality of students’ learning and their progress in ICT throughout the school by sharing best practice, in particular in using assessment information to enable differentiated activities in lessons  developing the VLE to enable students to have better online access to curriculum resources  further developing the curriculum to ensure that the use of ICT in other subjects is monitored and its impact known.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion