Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Serco Inspections (lead), Gill Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gill Jones, Serco Inspections

  • Postcode verified

    SS9 5UT

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingeffectivelyeffectiveoutstandingconsistentgood progressstrongconsistently
Criticisminadequateweakpoorweaknessesnot stronggapsabsenceyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1335w+10
  • Leadership381w−3

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,711
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Leadership 21%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Mrs C Woolf Headteacher Eastwood Primary School Rayleigh Road Leigh-on-Sea SS9 5UT

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 5 July 2011, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2010. The full list of the areas for improvement which were identified during that inspection are set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

Newly Qualified Teachers may not be appointed.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Eastwood Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Southend-on-Sea.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH Ofsted T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Serco Direct T 0121 683 3888

p.1

place in June 2010

 Improve the quality of teaching and accelerate pupils' learning by: – ensuring that the more-able pupils are consistently challenged in lessons – making better use of assessment information to plan activities that increase the pace of pupils' learning and close gaps between the attainment of boys and girls – adopting strategies that engage pupils more so that they can take greater ownership of their learning – making better use of time in lessons to increase the pace of learning.  Develop a more effective curriculum that: – promotes key skills, particularly writing, systematically across different subjects – makes learning more interesting by linking subjects more closely.  Establish a consistent approach to marking so that pupils know how to improve their work, by ensuring that: – teachers provide a clear evaluation of pupils' strengths and the next important steps for their learning – pupils are involved more in setting their targets and assessing

p.2

place in June 2010

their progress and that of others.  Generate a greater capacity for sustaining improvements in the school by: – defining clearly the roles of senior leaders – identifying where teachers' expertise needs improving and providing tailored professional development to improve outcomes for pupil– making sure that planned actions to tackle priorities are acted upon by all.  Raise attendance levels by making parents fully aware of their responsibilities to minimise absence.

p.2

Evidence

The inspector looked at the school’s work, visited all classrooms, scrutinised pupils’ exercise books and observed eight lessons. She looked at documents including minutes of the governing body and information about pupils’ progress. She met with staff, groups of pupils, governors and a representative from the local authority.

p.3

Context

Since the last monitoring inspection there have been several changes. A local authority funded nurture base opened in March 2011, providing places for pupils in need of additional support across Southend West. Two teachers have left the school. One teacher is absent on long-term sick leave. Two teachers are on maternity leave. A deputy headteacher has stepped down from that post of responsibility and is now a full-time teacher.

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Pupils’ achievement is improving. Recent, unvalidated test data from the national tests for Year 6 pupils demonstrate that pupils continue to increase their rate of progress and, consequently, the school has met its challenging targets for 2011. More pupils reached the levels expected nationally in English and mathematics than in recent years. In mathematics, the school exceeded its target for the proportion of pupils reaching the higher Level 5. Pupils’ attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 is improving, particularly in reading, where all pupils gained Level 2. However, standards in writing still lag behind those in reading across the school. Although there is significant improvement at the end of Key Stage 2 and in Key Stage 1, there remains a legacy of underachievement, particularly in the lower part of Key Stage 2, which has yet to be tackled successfully. The school is monitoring the progress of all

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

pupils systematically, including those known to be eligible for free school meals and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. However, the overall evaluation of their progress by staff is still at a relatively early stage of development. Pupils say that lessons are becoming more interesting and that they want to learn. They are taking more pride in their work and they were keen to show their exercise books to the inspector to demonstrate their progress. Pupils receiving additional support say that they enjoy their lessons, particularly when they are in a small group, practising their reading, writing and mathematics skills.

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Pupils continue to be polite and welcoming to visitors. Behaviour in lessons has improved since the previous monitoring inspection and the atmosphere around the school is much calmer. However, some squabbling in the playground remains, particularly over football.

p.4

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Pupils’ attendance is improving. The school has put a series of incentives in place which are working well. Fewer parents are taking their children on holiday during term time and the school is working more effectively with pupils who are persistently absent. Consequently, the school is exceeding the attendance targets set by the local authority.

p.4

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:  Raise attendance levels by making parents fully aware of their responsibilities to minimise absence – Good

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

The improvement in pupils’ progress is due to the improvement in teaching across the school. The inspector observed a greater proportion of good teaching than at the last visit. Where teaching was good, teachers have a clear picture of what they want pupils to achieve by the end of the lesson. Expectations are high and the level of challenge is appropriate to pupils’ abilities. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson for more-able pupils, the teacher set a practical problem where pupils had to work out the area of materials needed to refurbish the room by using metric measurements and then to cost this by using imperial measures. The pupils understood the purpose of this exercise and were suitably motivated by the task. In a Year 1 English lesson, pupils were writing a recount of sports day, using pictures to sequence the events. The teacher skilfully led the pupils to use words such as ‘first’ and ‘next’ to order the events. Consequently, the pupils made good progress in

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

their learning and produced work of a good quality.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Although a greater proportion of teaching is now strong, some inadequate practice remains. Where it is inadequate, teachers do not set clear expectations for what pupils are expected to learn by the end of the lesson. Also, teachers’ subject knowledge is weak, resulting in a poor diagnosis by the teacher of what the pupils already know and what they need to learn. Consequently, the work set does not challenge or motivate the pupils sufficiently well. For example, during a physical education lesson, the pupils remained sitting inactive for too long and did not have enough practise to improve their skills. They were not out of breath or physically challenged by the end of the lesson.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

The curriculum is being adapted more successfully to meet individual pupils’ learning needs. Staff are using data on attainment increasingly well to identify weaknesses in pupils’ skills. Interventions are being targeted more carefully and monitored regularly to check for their success in accelerating pupils’ learning. Where teaching is good, the challenge for more-able pupils in particular is appropriate. The school is beginning to look at how to use the curriculum more effectively to promote pupils’ skills, particularly in literacy and mathematics. However, this is still at an early stage of development.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

The quality of work in pupils’ exercise books continues to improve. Marking is regular and becoming increasingly consistent in quality across the school. Pupils know the levels they are working at and what they need to do next to improve their work. Teachers give pupils time to respond to their marking, which is making their comments more meaningful and leading to pupils’ faster progress. However, although the quality of marking is improving, some staff miss opportunities to correct pupils’ work while they are working with them in small groups. This means pupils sometimes copy incorrect work from their whiteboards into their exercise books.

p.5

The effectiveness of provision

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:  Improve the quality of teaching and accelerate pupils’ learning –

p.5

satisfactory

 Develop a more effective curriculum – satisfactory  Establish a consistent approach to marking so that pupils know how to improve their work – good

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The executive headteacher, supported effectively by the head of school, is continuing to improve the quality of education the pupils receive. The systems of accountability introduced at the last monitoring visit are now beginning to have an impact on raising the quality of teaching and improving pupils’ progress. Data on pupils’ attainment is being used increasingly well by staff to identify underachievement and to target additional support for individuals and groups of pupils where appropriate.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Extensive training has been provided for all staff by the head of school and other external consultants, including visits to other schools to observe outstanding teaching. Staff appreciate this and say it is enabling them to improve their own classroom practice. Staff morale is improving. Senior and middle leaders are increasing in confidence, but recognise that there is still a long way to go to ensure that their actions result in all pupils performing to their potential. Although the management and understanding of data is improving, the leadership of this area remains, to a large extent, externally driven. This is the same for much of the day- to- day monitoring of teachers’ planning and lesson observations.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The governing body is increasing its role and holding the school more effectively to account. Members are now aware of what needs to be done to continue to improve the quality of teaching and are prepared to take decisive action where necessary. They know that leadership capacity within the school is not yet strong enough in order for the school to sustain continuous improvement. The governing body is taking appropriate steps to work with the local authority in order to appoint a substantive headteacher.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:  Generate a greater capacity for sustaining improvements in the school –

p.6

External support

The quality of support from the local authority remains good. In securing an executive headteacher and head of school from a neighbouring school, it has provided much needed ambition, direction and stability for the school community. This is resulting in significant improvements in the outcomes for pupils. The human resources department is providing good support for the external headteacher in dealing with staffing issues. However, the necessary procedures are sometimes cumbersome and improvement is slow overall, too frequently leaving pupils with inadequate teaching.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion