Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Frater

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Frater

  • Postcode verified

    EX8 3AF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedenjoypositivestrengthseffectivesuccessfullyeffectivelyindependent
Criticisminadequateweaknessestoo fewinsufficientbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings581w−16
  • Leadership128w+50
  • What needs to improve115w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
805
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Allen Acting Principal Exmouth Community College Gipsy Lane Exmouth Devon EX8 3AF

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 10 and 11 May 2011 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight lessons, including joint observations with senior staff.

p.1

Ofsted 2011–12 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is good.

p.1

Achievement in English

 While attainment in the subject was well below average in the past three years, due to fewer students than average attaining higher GCSE grades, the college’s data indicate that current students are on track to achieve results that are above average.  This improvement is due to better teaching and learning that particularly engage boys in the subject, and in the use of more challenging targets to enable more students to reach A* and A grades at GCSE. All students know their target levels or grades and how to improve their work in order to reach the targets.  Over the past three years, students’ progress was inadequate. It is now good, due to improved monitoring of students’ progress towards their challenging targets, and a focus on developing reading skills. Boys make less progress than girls but the department is closing the gap. Boys say that they prefer the recently introduced approach to investigating and

p.1

Achievement in English

interpreting the meaning of texts and the new approach to writing.  The quality of students’ learning is good. Most students enjoy their lessons and all students display positive attitudes to learning and good behaviour.  The attainment of sixth form students is average, although it is better in English language than in English literature. While the quality of students’ learning and progress in the sixth form is satisfactory, there remain too few opportunities to develop independent learning skills.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 The key, characteristic strengths of teaching in Key Stages 3 and 4 are: well-structured lessons and variety of tasks; effective use of resources; opportunities to apply skills independently following modelling of the skills by the teacher; engagement of students in peer- and self-assessment; and regular marking that informs students how to improve their work. The ‘Assessing Pupil Progress’ guidelines are raising expectations of students at Key Stage 3.  Students say that they feel engaged in the majority of lessons. When asked what makes a good lesson, students in Key Stage 3 listed the following features: ‘a charismatic teacher who is not dull, role play, not being rushed and given more than two minutes to write, activities such as debating to make persuasive writing come alive, and visual aids such as films or media presentations’.  Common weaknesses in teaching that limit students’ progress are

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

insufficient use of higher target grades to challenge individual students in lessons, particularly more able students.  The quality of teaching and learning in A-level classes is satisfactory, although discussion tends to be over-led by the teacher.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is good.  The English curriculum is sufficiently broad and balanced to cover the different areas well. It includes media, role play and, to a lesser extent, information and communication technology.  The curriculum is planned creatively to meet the needs of students and includes intervention programmes for those who are underachieving.  Schemes of work in Year 9 are being revised appropriately in relation to the review of the National Curriculum.  The department, together with the college library, provides a wide range of enrichment activities. This includes visiting authors, theatre visits, public speaking, interviews, Carnegie shadowing, book competitions and certificates for the ‘best book borrowers’. As a result, students in Key Stage 3 read widely.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

The effectiveness of leadership and management in English is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 The head of English has successfully created a shared vision of improving teaching and learning across the very large department of 24 teachers.  Self-evaluation is brief but accurately identifies key priorities to inform the subject development plan.  The department carries out a wide range of monitoring, including tracking students’ progress, lesson observations and scrutiny of students’ work. However, the information is not evaluated rigorously, or shared with teachers, to identify and improve the impact of teaching on the progress of all students.  The head of English demonstrates good capacity for improvement. Procedures are being embedded to sustain improvement and the monitoring and evaluation skills of key stage coordinators within the department are being developed

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 using targets and assessment more effectively to match lessons to the range of abilities, particularly for more able students  evaluating the information gleaned from monitoring, and sharing it with teachers, to identify and improve the impact of teaching on the learning and progress of all students, particularly in the sixth form.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion