Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Jul 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sara Morrissey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sara Morrissey

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrongpositiveimprovedrigorousimprovingoutstandingeffective
Criticismweaknessesdisruptionmissednot alwaysnot consistentlygapsvariablepoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1479w−4
  • Leadership479w+62
  • What needs to improve94w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
2,051
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 5%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 852 Direct F 01695 729320 chuxley@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mr M Westerdale Principal Parkwood Academy Penrith Road Sheffield S5 8UF

p.1

Introduction

Following my visit with John Peckham HMI to your academy on 15 and 16 June 2011, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Introduction

The visit was a first monitoring inspection in connection with the academies initiative.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the academy's work, scrutinised documents and met with the Principal, other nominated staff, two groups of students, the Chair of the Governing Body, a representative of the sponsor and the academy’s improvement partner.

p.1

Context

The academy opened on the site of its predecessor school in September 2009 and serves a diverse community in north-east Sheffield. It is sponsored by E-ACT and has subject specialisms in modern foreign languages and sport. The academy is smaller than the average sized secondary school, but has experienced an increase in student numbers since September 2010. There are currently 698 students on roll and projected numbers for students joining the academy in Year 7 indicate that there will be a further increase in September 2011. The proportion of students who are known to be eligible for free school meals is high. At 49.3%, the proportion of students from minority ethnic groups is twice the national average. The groups most represented include those of Black or Black British African and Pakistani origin. Thirty eight percent of students speak English as an additional language. Student mobility is above average and the academy has experienced an increase

p.1

Context

in the number of students who are newly arrived in the country, in particular those of Romany Slovakian origin. Over half of all students have been identified as having special

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page2 educational needs and/or disabilities, although the proportion with a statement to support their specific learning needs is lower than the national average.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

A new Principal and vice-principal took up post in September 2010. A new Chair of the Governing Body was appointed at the same time. Since then, the senior leadership team has been restructured, resulting in some changes to key roles. Most staff from the predecessor school transferred to the academy when it opened. During the last year, the academy has experienced higher than average levels of staff absence, which have resulted in some disruption to provision, particularly in mathematics. Executive leadership of English and mathematics is currently provided by two vice-principals. The academy has been successful in recruiting suitably qualified teachers to fill vacancies arising from a number of resignations and is almost fully staffed for September 2011. New accommodation for the academy is currently on schedule to be completed by spring 2012.

p.2

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Students’ attainment on entry to the academy is low overall. In 2010, the proportion of Year 11 students gaining five GCSE passes at A* to C, including English and mathematics, was below the minimum levels expected for their age. The percentage who gained five passes at A* to G was also below the national average. Students’ performance varied widely between subjects. Progress in English was significantly below expected levels and while published data indicate that students made broadly satisfactory progress in mathematics. This was due to a heavy reliance on targeted intervention to close gaps in prior learning. More positively, students’ performance in physical education (PE) was higher than the national average and more than half of students gained a qualification in a modern foreign languages course.

p.2

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Current assessment information suggests that attainment by the end of Year 11 is beginning to rise due to a systematic approach to closing gaps in prior learning. Results from early exam entries in English and mathematics indicate that outcomes for Year 11 students sitting examinations this summer will exceed the minimum targets set by the government. Progress in other years is more variable and reflects the quality of teaching. During the inspection, learning proceeded at a brisk pace where imaginative activities engaged all students fully and challenged them to aim high. In particular, resources were adapted well to enable students who are new to English to participate fully. The pace of learning was less consistent where opportunities were missed for students to develop their own ideas or to reflect or consolidate what they know or can do. Occasionally, progress slowed because activities did not match students’ varied needs.

p.2

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Since September 2010, increased levels of accountability across the academy ensure that progress is tracked more rigorously towards long-term success criteria. Academy leaders have established a robust system to set challenging targets and track students’ progress over time, taking into account those who join the academy at times other than the start of the academic year.

p.2

Other relevant pupil outcomes

A positive learning environment has been established and students’ aspirations are rising as a result of the strong academy focus on raising attainment. Good opportunities are provided for students to take responsibility as members of the student council, peer mentors and sports leaders. In lessons, students are generally good natured and show interest in their learning. High levels of supervision ensure that behaviour is orderly on busy corridors around the academy. Changes to the academy’s behaviour management systems in January 2011 have been well received by students and staff because expectations are clearly communicated and simple to follow. Resulting improvements in behaviour are reflected in the sharp fall in numbers of referrals for poor behaviour and fixed-term exclusions over the last year. Students report that behaviour has improved and that there are fewer instances when their learning is disrupted by others. However, some inappropriate behaviour persists,

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

including low-level chatter that is not consistently challenged by teachers.

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Attendance has improved significantly from low levels since September and is currently around 92 %. This is as a result of well-coordinated strategies that include: raising the profile of regular attendance through the academy’s reward system; rigorous monitoring of attendance; and engagement with families, for example, through the Somali Study Support Consortium and the appointment of a native speaker to work with Slovakian families.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

Lesson observations during the inspection matched those undertaken by academy leaders which indicate an improving picture in teaching quality across the academy. Almost all teaching seen was satisfactory and over half was good or better, including two examples of outstanding practice. Where teaching is most effective, expectations are high. Students of all abilities are supported and challenged well so their progress is rapid. These lessons are characterised by high levels of participation and enjoyment of learning because teachers build on students’ prior learning effectively through a wide variety of practical activities. Good attention is paid to developing students’ literacy skills and to increase their confidence in expressing ideas, particularly through group work. Time is allocated for students to reflect on what they have learnt and apply their skills to new situations. However, this practice is

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

not consistent across the academy. The desire for pace in lessons is sometimes at the expense of clarity or understanding and opportunities are missed for students to consolidate or reflect on what they have learnt. Opportunities are also missed to transfer basic skills and knowledge between subjects to maximise learning outcomes. Agreed procedures for managing behaviour are not always used consistently with the result that teaching is interrupted by low-level disruption. The quality of marking is variable; it is usually regular, but not always as productive as it might be in guiding students to their next steps in learning.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

An ongoing programme of continuing professional development is proving effective in developing teachers’ skills to respond to the broad range of students’ learning needs, including those who are at the early stages of learning English as an additional language.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page4 The academy is also developing its own first language testing programme as a response to an increasing number of students who are new to English in order that provision can be tailored appropriately. Teachers of specialist subjects make a positive contribution to improving the quality of provision by sharing best practice to expand the range of teachers’ skills in other subject areas, for example, mathematics.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Since September 2010, academy leaders have recognised that the current curriculum no longer matches students’ needs as effectively as it might. Consequently, a new programme is in the advanced stages of preparation, to be implemented from September 2011. Plans indicate that greater emphasis will be placed on developing specialist subject knowledge and skills from Year 7 onwards and providing greater flexibility for students embarking on Key Stage 4 courses. The academy is also developing off-site provision with partner providers to increase the range of vocational programmes available.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Well-established systems ensure that students, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, are supported well. Progress meetings with tutors are well received by students and have a positive impact on raising aspirations for the future.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

A period of intensive activity, to tackle urgent priorities, means that the academy is on track to fulfil the aims set out in the Principal’s vision statement and associated improvement plan. The Principal has generated a strong focus on raising attainment with the aim that all students benefit from a relevant programme that unlocks their potential and enables them to achieve their best. He has led and managed the academy effectively through a period of significant change. Senior leaders have adapted well to their new roles that reflect their strengths. The capacity of this group to drive improvement has been strengthened as a result of these changes and leaders are focused well on key priorities. Strong leadership provided by the vice-principals, who are currently responsible for English and mathematics, means that weaknesses in provision have been tackled rigorously and effectively.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

The quality of middle leadership is improving. Leaders are developing the skills to monitor and evaluate the performance in their area of responsibility more effectively. They value the challenge and support they have received from senior leaders and are more confident to hold individual teachers to account.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

Staff are generally very positive about the changes over the last year and the great majority have responded well to the clear expectations communicated by leaders. They express confidence in the academy’s secure systems to help track students’ progress and improve the quality of provision. Opportunities to experiment with new teaching methods have reinvigorated staff and provided opportunities for some to develop new strategies that are being shared within the academy and to wider audiences.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

The rapid pace of change since September 2010 has been informed by accurate self- evaluation led by the Principal and the vice-principals that is reflective, challenging and

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page5 rooted in reliable data. The governing body provides increasing levels of support and challenge. The Chair of the Governing Body has a good knowledge of the academy’s strengths and weaknesses and governors are highly committed to the roles they play in holding academy leaders to account for students’ performance. Although leaders recognise that some inconsistencies remain in the implementation of agreed procedures, firm foundations have been established on which to build and the academy is well placed to improve further.

p.5

External support

A wide range of external consultant support has been tailored effectively by academy leaders to meet priorities identified in the academy improvement plan, particularly in improving the quality of teaching. Visits by the academy’s improvement partner have provided helpful opportunities for the Principal to reflect on progress made during the year. The network of E-ACT academies also acts as a source of support as well as enabling lead teachers to share good practice. The representative of the academy’s sponsor provides good levels of challenge and support through a regular and rigorous monitoring process that is focused sharply on students’ outcomes.

p.5

Main Judgements

The academy has made satisfactory progress towards raising standards.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

  Raise attainment in English and mathematics.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Embed agreed procedures to drive improvement and ensure consistency in their application across the academy.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that the skills and knowledge that students develop in lessons are transferrable between subjects to maximise their impact on learning.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Group at the Department for Education. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.5

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page6 cc Chair of the Governing Body the Academies Group, DfE [ Paul.hann@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk ]

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion