Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Lindfield
- Postcode verified
B98 9HR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes15
“The school has made good progress in improving pupils’ rates of attendance.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,092
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 10 June 2011
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Mrs S Fisher Headteacher Moons Moat First School Cleeve Close Redditch B98 9HR
p.1
Moat First School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 9 June 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please convey my thanks to the pupils for their friendly manner.
p.1
Moat First School
As a result of the inspection on 14 December 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Moat First School
Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.
p.1
Moat First School
Since the last inspection, attainment at Key Stage 1 has improved. In 2010, an increased proportion of pupils reached nationally expected levels in reading, writing and mathematics. Similarly, the proportion of pupils attaining higher Level 3 results increased in each of these subjects. The school’s latest assessments show that the school has maintained these standards and that the proportion of pupils in Year 2 performing at expected levels is in line with the national average.
p.1
Moat First School
The school’s focus on providing regular and lively storytelling sessions and on improving reading resources have helped to improve pupils’ achievement in reading. With support from local authority advisers, staff have introduced new strategies to encourage children to segment and blend their sounds. From an early age, children are now provided with systematic phonics sessions which help to improve their reading development. In a well delivered phonics lesson, Year 1 pupils made good progress and enjoyed using robot actions as they sounded out words containing ‘air’. Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH Ofsted T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Serco Direct T 0121 683 3888
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 Improved access to outdoor areas for children in the Reception Year has increased opportunities for children to choose activities indoors and outside. This free access has helped to encourage children’s independence and self-confidence. Leaders of the Early Years Foundation Stage have extended opportunities for children to develop their mathematical understanding. During an activity outdoors, children developed their number and counting skills well with the good support of a teaching assistant. The teaching assistant used a wide range of questions to challenge and develop children’s counting and recognition of numbers. However, this approach is not consistent across the school and support staff are not consistently provided with clear plans and instructions.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Teaching across the school is satisfactory and consistently provides greater levels of challenge for pupils of all abilities. Planning regularly details the different activities that pupils are expected to complete in a lesson. Teachers are making better use of assessments to ensure that these activities are more closely matched to the abilities of different groups of pupils. Pupils know how to produce a good piece of work because time is taken to clearly record and share this information with them. As a result, the school is beginning to address pupils’ previous underachievement and low starting points. A whole-school approach has improved pupils’ presentation and handwriting. Year 2 pupils produced regular and well-formed letters whilst writing instructions on growing sunflowers. Several pupils wrote fluently with joined up writing
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Across Years 3 and 4, pupils’ progress is more consistent and is never less than satisfactory. Teachers take care to build good relationships and value the contributions of pupils of all abilities. As a result, pupils show positive attitudes to learning in the majority of lessons. Good teaching in Year 4 is helping pupils to address their previous underachievement and raise attainment. The school’s most recent assessments show that the current attainment of Year 4 pupils is improving but that their progress across Key Stage 2 in mathematics remains weaker. This is because pupils are not provided with sufficient opportunities to increase their basic computational skills and this undermines their ability to solve number problems quickly and confidently.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The school’s capacity to continue to improve is satisfactory. Leaders and managers have produced a school development plan that is accurately focussed on the key areas. Subject leaders have developed their roles and responsibilities and produce action plans aimed at improving individual subjects. These provide a clear strategy and framework to develop the school and improve key areas. Monitoring is regular and helps to evaluate the school’s progress in raising achievement. Information from assessments is used regularly to ensure that pupils’ progress is closely monitored. Senior leaders respond quickly to ensure that teachers draw up plans to provide additional support for individual pupils. Lesson observations have ensured that the quality of teaching and learning across the school is more consistent. However, in seeking to raise achievement to consistently good levels, these evaluations do not consistently focus on the progress of different groups of pupils.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 3 The school completes all appropriate checks on the suitability of staff and governors. Senior leaders and the Chair of the Governing Body have recently completed safer recruitment training. The school’s safeguarding policies and procedures are reviewed regularly. The school keeps careful records and works with other professional agencies to ensure that vulnerable pupils are closely monitored. The school ensures that risk assessments are completed as required but those to address hazards in outdoor areas lack sufficient rigour.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The school has made good progress in improving pupils’ rates of attendance. Pupils are encouraged to attend regularly through certificates and special assemblies. In addition, the school has received regular support from the Education Welfare Officer in adopting a more immediate response to any instances of persistent absence. This has been effective in ensuring that pupils’ attendance over the course of the academic year has improved and is now satisfactory.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 4
p.4
place in December 2009
Seek further support from the local authority, as a matter of urgency, to improve the erratic attendance and lack of punctuality of pupils and the negative impact of these factors on their achievement.
p.4
place in December 2009
Ensure that pupils achieve more consistently across the school, particularly in mathematics, by;
p.4
place in December 2009
- providing greater levels of challenge, especially for more able pupils
p.4
place in December 2009
- building upon and further refining teachers’ understanding and use of assessment
p.4
place in December 2009
- giving greater priority to improving pupils’ handwriting and presentation of written work
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion