Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Jun 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alan Lemon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Lemon

  • Postcode verified

    SG16 6LQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectivepositivewell plannedenjoywell supportedrigoroussuccessful
Criticismweaknesseslacklowernot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
930
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Davies Stondon Lower School Hillside Road Lower Stondon Henlow SG16 6LQ

p.1

Lower School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 25 May 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection.

p.1

Lower School

Since the inspection of October 2009, a new extension has been added to the school building providing a Children’s Centre, additional classrooms, including one equipped for teaching information and communication technology (ICT). Two teachers left the school and were replaced by two new appointments. In this small school it represents a significant turnover of teachers.

p.1

Lower School

As a result of the inspection on 7 October 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Lower School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Lower School

The attainment of the majority of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics is above average at the end of Key Stage 1 and by the end of Year 4. In 2010, attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 was significantly above average and a considerable improvement on the broadly average attainment of previous years. The above average attainment across the school in 2010 and 2011 reflects pupils’ good progress. The 2010 Year 2 cohort, now Year 3 pupils, performed so well because they started Key Stage 1 above average. They were the first year group to have spent one whole year in Reception and also the first to benefit from the stable staffing now enjoyed by the whole school. The impact of good Early Years Foundation Stage provision and good teaching across the school is now raising attainment. Currently, pupils are in reach of challenging targets, showing they make Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street

p.1

Lower School

Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH Ofsted T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Serco Direct T 0121 683 3888 September 2010 Page 2 good progress. Behaviour is good, attendance is high and pupils enjoy learning. Good attitudes to learning are encouraged by parents and learning is well supported at home.

p.1

Lower School

Teaching is good and leaders are effective in embedding in teaching the qualities to promote good learning. A substantial programme of professional development, rigorous monitoring and successful appointments have improved teaching. Lessons are taught in a lively, engaging fashion and pupils are enthusiastically engaged in learning. They have many opportunities to be independent, use their initiative and learn in practical ways. A pair of Year 1 pupils worked out that they needed to measure the doorway to determine if the dimensions of their object would go through it, thus gaining a good understanding of ‘bigger and smaller than’. Occasionally, the learning objectives teachers define for a lesson lack clarity, which causes a loss of focus. As a result, the teacher’s work and pupils’ efforts are, to an extent, less effective in promoting learning.

p.2

Lower School

Subject leadership is well-established and makes a significant contribution to driving improvement. It widens the scope for effective leadership across the school, producing a cohesive team effort and increasing the school’s capacity for improvement. Roles are clearly defined and effectively executed. Subject leaders have benefitted from a wide range of professional development opportunities such as ‘Leading from the Middle’ training and by courtesy of links with other schools. They monitor their subjects by observing teaching and they evaluate learning through analysis of data and scrutiny of pupils’ work. Subject leaders produce good annual reports and action plans, linked to their performance management, which ensure that strengths are built upon and weaknesses tackled systematically.

p.2

Lower School

Leaders have pursued a clear vision for a curriculum to stimulate pupils’ enthusiasm for learning. This is developing successfully as a result of a well-coordinated team effort, and the curriculum has a positive impact on attainment and progress. Work and activities are linked together in a variety of topics which are planned to build upon learning in a well-ordered way. There is good emphasis on practical ways of learning, such as in the school’s garden or on educational visits. The curriculum is clearly directed at promoting pupils’ learning of basic skills. The opportunities for reading, writing, mathematics and ICT are all well planned to meet the needs of pupils of all capabilities.

p.2

Lower School

The school’s good progress since its last inspection is greatly assisted by the many partnerships with other schools. This has helped in broadening the curriculum, particularly through the school’s sports partnership. Teachers have benefitted from September 2010 Page 3 sharing with other schools good practice and holding moderation exercises to strengthen assessment.

p.2

Lower School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

place in October 2009

 Raise the amount of good teaching by 20% by September 2010 by ensuring that: – staff make more consistent and accurate use of assessment in planning new work, especially in mathematics – the good practice already in the school is modelled as a positive example.

p.4

place in October 2009

 Improve the skills of staff with subject leadership roles so that they develop a good level of competence in evaluating teaching and learning outcomes, are confident to take action on their findings and so increase rates of progress and levels of attainment further.

p.4

place in October 2009

 Refine the curriculum so that it is more appealing to pupils, develops subject skills in a structured way and makes more effective links between subjects.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion