Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Jun 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Jordan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russell Jordan

  • Postcode verified

    DY1 3JE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrongstrengthsvery wellgood progresswell-plannedclearwell-designed
Criticismat riskinsufficientnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings862w+79
  • What needs to improve107w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
953
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms M King Headteacher Castle High School and Visual Arts College St James Road Dudley West Midlands DY1 3JE

p.1

and business education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 23 and 24 March 2011 to look at work in economics and business education.

p.1

and business education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and business education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of seven lessons and a year-group assembly.

p.1

and business education

The overall effectiveness of economics and business education, including the development of students’ economic and business understanding and enterprise and financial capability, is good.

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

Achievement in economics and business education is good.

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

 A higher proportion of students than the national average gains A* to C grades in the Applied GCSE in business. This represents good progress for these students relative to their prior attainment. In the lessons observed, students demonstrated a range of attainment, but most are on track to meet highly challenging target grades.  In the lessons observed, students used information and communication technology (ICT) well to support their learning, in particular demonstrating good research skills and use of a variety of software. Their behaviour was good and they were fully engaged in well-planned tasks and activities, working on their own, or in pairs. Students enjoy their business lessons and value highly the support they receive from teachers.  Students not taking business examination courses develop good economics and business understanding, and financial and enterprise capabilities. They value this part of their studies and in particular being

p.1

Achievement in economics and business education

able to work together in a concentrated block of time in ‘Focus Days’.

p.2

Quality of teaching in economics and business education

The quality of teaching in economics and business education is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in economics and business education

 Teachers have an excellent rapport with their students and know well their strengths and areas for improvement. They provide students with excellent individual support in lessons, although, on occasions, this impinges on the development of students’ independent learning skills.  Where appropriate, teachers made good use of a range of resources and in particular used ICT very well to enhance learning, including film clips and other web-based resources.  In the lessons observed, teachers planned lessons well with interesting tasks that supported what they intended students to learn. They illustrated their lessons successfully with topical, real-life examples. Planned extension tasks posed students extra challenge, and learning was enhanced through peer review.  As the school acknowledges, teachers’ use of questioning to check and extend learning is an area for improvement. Where questioning was less

p.2

Quality of teaching in economics and business education

successful, more vocal students were allowed to dominate on occasions, and teachers made insufficient use of directed questioning. Teachers were often too ready to summarise students’ responses and were too content with basic answers. As a result, teachers progressed on to the next stage of the lesson before consolidating students’ understanding.  Teachers’ feedback on students’ work is detailed and thorough, providing useful guidance on how to improve performance and encouragement to achieve higher grades. Their marking shows good attention to students’ spelling and grammar, and the correct use of business terminology.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in economics and business education

The quality of the curriculum in economics and business education is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in economics and business education

 The current business curriculum meets students’ needs well, reflecting the range of their prior attainment. Business is a very popular choice with a much higher proportion of students studying business than is the case nationally.  Whole-school provision for economics and business understanding, personal financial capability and enterprise is good. The school has a good overview of the provision and where this is taught in subjects. The programme of ‘Focus Days’ is well conceived and coherent. However, the school is not yet able to assess students’ achievements in this area of work against identified learning outcomes.  Work-experience is well organised and the school prepares students well. Leaders and managers are working to good effect to improve the school’s links with businesses to enhance the provision in formally assessed business courses and in the whole-school provision.

p.2

business education

Leadership and management in economics and business education are good.

p.3

business education

 Leaders and managers of the formally assessed business provision have a clear understanding of the strengths and areas for improvement of this work and are focused clearly on raising further the levels of students’ progress and attainment. The culture of continuous improvement is strong. Teachers are supported well, including having good professional development opportunities.  Teachers’ monitoring of students’ progress is particularly strong, and interventions to support those at risk of underachieving are bringing about improvement in their performance.  The vision for the whole-school provision is clear and shows the impact of well-designed actions to improve its quality. Leaders and managers have a clear understanding of how this provision may be improved further. Coordination of the work being done across subjects to develop economics and business understanding, personal financial and enterprise capabilities

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 implementing plans to develop the assessment of students’ economics and business understanding, enterprise and personal financial capabilities in the whole-school provision  ensuring that teachers’ use of questioning to check and extend learning is of a consistently high standard in lessons.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop economics and business education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion