Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jun 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Trevor Riddiough

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Trevor Riddiough

  • Postcode verified

    LE3 6DN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressimprovedeffectivelyrigorousstrongeffectivepositiveimproving
Criticismshortcomingstoo lowweakernot consistentlylowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,211
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 19 May 2011

p.1

Mrs Jane Brown New College Leicester Glenfield Road Leicester LE3 6DN

p.1

College Leicester

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your college together with Joseph Skivington, additional inspector, on 18 May 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please also thank the Chair of the Governing Body and the students that we met.

p.1

College Leicester

Since the previous inspection in October 2009, there have been significant changes in the structure of governance and in the leadership of the college. In 2010, the college formed a trust with a number of other education providers and the local authority as trustees. Appointments have also been made to further strengthen the leadership team.

p.1

College Leicester

As a result of the inspection on 7 October 2009, the college was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the college has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

College Leicester

Good progress has been made in raising students’ achievement from their very low starting points. In 2010, students’ progress from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4 was broadly satisfactory; however, standards remained well below average overall. Validated data shows that the percentage of students gaining five A* to C grades including English and mathematics, although still too low, improved in 2010. Well- targeted intervention strategies, notably in the core subjects, have resulted in students of all abilities making satisfactory progress. In 2010, results at GCSE were the best in the college’s history, with 65% of students gaining five or more good grades at GCSE. The college’s internal tracking information shows that this trend of improvement is continuing and, for 2011, levels of attainment are expected to be closer to national averages. Our observations coupled with results already gained through early examination entry, confirm the college’s view that standards and the

p.1

College Leicester

Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH Ofsted T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Serco 0121 683 3261 Direct T 0121 683 3888

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 progress that students make has improved further. These improvements are the result of developments in the quality of teaching and learning and the targeted support for individual students who are identified as underachieving. The college systematically tracks students’ progress against their challenging academic targets to ensure that teachers are able to correct any shortcomings in good time. As a result, the college is well on track to reach the floor targets by the expected date set out in the previous inspection report.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The college judges the quality of teaching as satisfactory with just over half of lessons good or better. During our visit, we observed 20 part-lessons, around half of which were good. This suggests a similar picture. Good lessons are marked by pace, and challenge where teachers plan effectively to build progressively on previous learning. In the satisfactory lessons, these features are less evident. Action has been taken to strengthen aspects of teaching such as the quality and consistency of planning. Recommendations from lesson observations are built into the performance management of all teachers, and effective support from the coaching team is provided were needed. Regular in-service training, learning walks, book scrutinies and rigorous quality assurance all contribute. Literacy support, commencing in Year 7, is provided by qualified teaching assistants. More challenge, particularly for high ability students, is built into lesson plans. There are still areas of development in

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

teaching skills which the college is aware of and is steadily targeting.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Assessment is making a positive contribution to raising levels of attainment. Level descriptors in the front of folders and books show clearly grade differences as the year progresses. As a result, students’ progress is immediately obvious, especially in the core subjects. In these subjects, comments from teachers, orally and in the books, indicate specific areas for improvement. In weaker areas, such as humanities, levelling is still being embedded and marking is not consistently helpful. Students have been involved in reviewing policies in marking and in the development of student-friendly criteria to help them to judge for themselves their success in a subject. In order to sustain these improvements, a development group of staff has been set up to monitor the impact of assessment.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The college has done much to develop its work in promoting community cohesion. Activities have broadened outside the college community and now involve the local community of Leicester, as well as internationally. The awareness and commitment of staff to broaden students’ experiences has been raised considerably through training and awareness-raising events. As a result, students now have a greater understanding of where they have come from and the city in which they live. The college is now working on developing their understanding of the country and the society in which they live. This understanding is exemplified in a comment made by a student following a ‘viewpoint day’: ‘It does not matter who you are, everybody should be treated equally.’

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

This year, leadership has continued to be strengthened as the college shapes its future path. All faculties are now fully staffed with qualified teachers or are expected

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 3 to be in the near future. The appointment of a vice principal has provided additional capacity and strengthened mathematics. There have been new appointments made at head of department level in special educational needs and humanities. Self- evaluation at all levels is rigorous and honest. It is used very effectively to identify where improvements are needed. Tight, structured and focused line management arrangements ensure that the correct actions take place to bring about the required improvements. There is an aspirational and focused plan that sets out a strong vision for the future, with challenging targets which support the raising of standards. There is also a programme that is aimed at enhancing the role and significance of the college both within the local and wider community. As a result, rolls are rising and the current Year 7 is full to capacity.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The college has received some useful support through the National Challenge programme which has provided additional help and resources aimed at improving attainment in English and mathematics. Local authority advisers and external consultants have provided helpful support in coaching members of the middle and senior leadership teams in monitoring and evaluation and in improving aspects of teaching.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your college. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 4

p.4

place in October 2009

 Raise standards of attainment by: - embedding the use of assessment in the classroom so that the quality of learning and the progress students make in all key stages is at least good - developing teaching strategies further so that students of all abilities are sufficiently challenged in all their lessons - ensuring that Year 11 students meet National Challenge targets by 2011.

p.4

place in October 2009

 Develop the school’s work in promoting community cohesion by broadening its activities beyond the local community.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion