Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Johnson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Johnson

  • Postcode verified

    M27 8GW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedsuccessfullypositiveconsistentlysecure
Criticismpoorlackbelowslowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
838
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Debbie Ramsay Executive Head of Centre The Clifton Centre 117 Silverdale Clifton Swinton Greater Manchester M27 8GW

p.1

Centre

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave me when I inspected your school on 5 October 2010, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the teachers and students I spoke to and to the representatives from the local authority.

p.1

Centre

There have been significant changes to the leadership of the centre since the previous inspection. The headteacher retired, having previously been seconded to a different role within the local authority. An interim management team was put in place in April; this included the two deputy headteachers, who both retired at the end of the summer term. In September an executive head of centre was appointed, supported by a senior associate head of centre, a senior vocational adviser and an associate headteacher. This management structure will be reviewed in December. Salford City Council plans to decommission the current Pupil Referral Units in the authority and replace them with four Learning Recovery Units. This plan is still evolving and the authority is awaiting various consultancy reports to inform the process.

p.1

Centre

As a result of the inspection on 1 July 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Centre

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com September 2010 Page 2 There are currently 42 students on roll. One area for improvement outlined in the previous inspection report concerned low attendance levels. Attendance levels are still below those expected in most schools; however, they have improved significantly.

p.1

Centre

At the end of the summer term, 33 Year 11 students left the centre, most gained basic literacy and numeracy qualifications and a high proportion went on to further education, training or employment. During the course of last year, five students were successfully reintegrated back into mainstream education and two students with a statement of special educational needs moved on to appropriate alternative provision. Students’ attainment remains below average. In the main this is due to their lack of progress in their previous schools. In the lessons observed students’ development of skills, knowledge and understanding in a variety of subjects was satisfactory and in some cases good. Many students have a history of poor behaviour; however, behaviour observed was satisfactory both in classrooms and around the buildings.

p.2

Centre

At the previous inspection inspectors were concerned about the arrangements to support students attending the centre as a result of a fixed period of exclusion from secondary school. In September 2009 the local authority advised mainstream schools that the centre was no longer available to support students who are excluded for a fixed period. An additional building was secured for use by the centre from the start of this term and this has improved the environment for learning. Despite the significant investment to improve vocational provision on the main site, for example, by the provision of a new beauty salon and gym, some parts of the existing building remain in a dilapidated condition.

p.2

Centre

After the previous inspection an action plan was put in place to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Progress was at first slow; however, there are signs that the rate of improvement is accelerating. For example, there have been positive developments in the teaching of functional skills and sharing of good practice with other local Pupil Referral Units. Aspects of lesson planning, the use of individual learning plans and marking still need to be improved to ensure that lessons are consistently good. This monitoring visit included a check on the school’s safeguarding procedures by scrutinising the single central record and found this to be secure. The local authority set up the Clifton Centre Review Group in July 2009, including a National Leader in Education and the School Improvement Partner. This group has enabled good multi-agency support to be provided to the Centre.

p.2

Centre

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

place in July 2009

 Improve pupils' achievement and personal development by taking all necessary steps to ensure that they attend school.  Work closely with the local authority to provide accommodation for the centre that is fit for purpose.  Provide separate accommodation and suitable programmes of work for local pupils referred to the centre on the sixth day of temporary exclusion.  Improve teaching by making sure that the best use is made of time and full use is made of all resources including electronic whiteboards.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion