Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kekshan Salaria

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kekshan Salaria

  • Postcode verified

    W1K 2XH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedpositiveconsistentskilledeffectivelystrengthsenjoyment
Criticismnot yetweaknessesinconsistencieslackgapsvariablemissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings546w+6
  • What needs to improve94w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
626
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Lothian Headteacher St George's Hanover Square CofE Primary School South Street London W1K 2XH

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 21 September 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; discussions with senior leaders, other staff and pupils and a representative from the local authority.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is satisfactory.

p.1

Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment

 APP is beginning to have a positive impact on achievement. Standards have risen since the school’s institutional inspection in 2009, particularly in English. Pupils’ progress is tracked well and the information gathered is used to ensure they are given effective support where necessary.  APP has improved the rigour of target setting. This is now consistent throughout the school. Pupils are not yet involved in the process of setting their own targets for improvement.

p.1

Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress

 APP criteria are enabling teachers to examine pupils’ acquisition of subject skills more precisely.Teachers are becoming more skilled in using the criteria to identify gaps in the learning of individual pupils or groups and adapt interventions to tackle them.

p.2

support learning

 Increased training opportunities have resulted in improved rigour in monitoring teaching and learning and following up any issues arising from direct observation and analysis of performance data.  APP is helping to drive effective action to improve the quality of teaching and the use of assessment. However, some inconsistencies remain. Expertise in matching learning objectives and activities to pupils’ needs has not yet been fully shared. Some teachers have a tendency to work through the prescribed lesson plan rather than adapt it or alter the pace of learning to maximise pupils’ progress.  As a result of using APP, teachers are more focused on pupils’ ability to evaluate their own work; this is evident in some lessons but it is more consistent in workbooks where pupils comment on their understanding and also respond to teachers’ comments.  Pupils’ progress is evaluated in relation to the learning objectives for each

p.2

support learning

lesson. Most pupils use their individual targets well to establish what they are able to do and what they need to do next.  The feedback and marking policy is embedded and used effectively. Pupils understand the systems and are given time to reflect on their learning.  The impact of teaching assistants’ interventions to support pupils’ learning is variable. This is mainly due to missed opportunities for training and a lack of guidance about the purpose of learning activities.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 APP has encouraged the school to review and further develop the curriculum to make it more interesting and relevant with stronger links between subjects.  Through their use of APP, teachers have a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ learning. Consequently, the curriculum is more tailored to pupils’ needs enhancing their enjoyment of learning.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 involving pupils in setting their own targets for improvement  extending professional development opportunities for teaching assistants to engage more deeply with the principles of effective assessment practice.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion