Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jacqueline White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jacqueline White

  • Postcode verified

    BN23 7SL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengthsgood progresshigh-qualityconsistentlyimprovedeffectivestronglyenthusiastic
Criticismweaknessesgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings540w+64
  • What needs to improve103w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
630
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Fairclough Headteacher West Rise Junior School Chaffinch Road Langney Eastbourne BN23 7SL Dear Mr Fairclough

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 22 September 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; discussions with senior leaders, other staff and pupils; and a telephone conversation with a local authority officer.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is good.

p.1

Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment

 As a result of their engagement with APP, teachers’ deepening understanding of progression in subjects is contributing to pupils’ improving achievement. Attainment has risen considerably over the last three years with most pupils making good progress consistently.  APP has helped teachers and senior leaders clarify strengths and weaknesses in learning in relation to cohorts, classes, particular groups and individual pupils. This has improved the rigour of target-setting at all levels and strengthened systems for monitoring pupils’ progress.

p.1

Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress

 APP contributes to providing pupils with appropriate success criteria that enable them to evaluate their own and other pupils’ work. As well as motivating them to succeed, regular opportunities for peer- and self- assessment are giving pupils a deeper understanding of the purpose of their learning.  APP criteria inform teachers’ individual discussions with pupils about their learning. These conversations are beginning to support pupils’ involvement in setting and reviewing their own targets. The school rightly wants to develop this approach further.  The school is using APP well to identify gaps in pupils’ learning and tailor interventions that will tackle them.

p.1

support learning

 APP has triggered the growth of a culture of continuous learning within the school. This is demonstrated in the high-quality professional dialogue between staff about what best promotes and supports effective learning. In addition, there is a collective accountability for pupils’ progress with all teachers focused strongly on meeting the needs of individual pupils. Teaching assistants are enthusiastic about working alongside teachers in this endeavour but would benefit from further training in the use of APP.  Teachers are fluent in the common assessment language provided by APP. This is enabling collaborative approaches to planning learning that build on pupils’ capabilities and understanding systematically.  APP has helped teachers to develop the skill of probing pupils’ understanding in lessons. In this context, questioning and ‘talk partners’ are used well.  APP has facilitated thorough moderation of pupils’ attainment that has

p.2

support learning

consolidated teachers’ knowledge of National Curriculum levels and raised their expectations of what pupils can achieve.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 APP is promoting the development of cross-curricular links that help pupils to understand how subjects are interconnected.  APP is enabling teachers to map assessment opportunities across the curriculum in a coherent and systematic way. This has enhanced creativity because teachers are confident that pupils’ learning experiences are anchored to a rigorous framework for assessment.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 establishing regular individual discussions with pupils to involve them in reviewing their learning and setting targets  increasing opportunities for teaching assistants to undertake training in the use of APP to identify strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ learning.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion