Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Humpty Dumpty Day Nursery

Inspected 21 Oct 2004 · published 19 Dec 2004 · URN 200629

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Sally Elizabeth Lee

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Oct 2004

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Sally Elizabeth Lee

  • Postcode verified

    CV22 7NH

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    200629

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentlygood progressimprovedeagerconfidentenjoy
Criticismlimitednot yetmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings115w−33
  • What needs to improve475w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
587
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 38%About the inspection 53%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 21/10/2004 Inspector Name Sally Elizabeth Lee

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Full Day Care Setting Name HUMPTY DUMPTY DAY NURSERY Setting Address MAGNET LANE BILTON RUGBY WARKS CV22 7NH

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

Humpty Dumpty Nursery offers good quality nursery education where children enjoy learning through a range of interesting, practical activities. Effective teaching helps children make generally good progress towards the early learning goals. They make very good progress in physical development and generally good progress in all other areas of learning although they are not always encouraged to express themselves imaginatively in music, movement and dance. The quality of teaching is generally good. Staff's sound knowledge of the Foundation Stage enables them to plan practical activities to help children to learn. Children's progress is assessed regularly and there is an effective programme in place to provide support for children with special educational needs. Staff work alongside the children and are involved in their play. However they do not always provide sufficient challenge for older and more able children or have high expectations of children's

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

progress. Leadership and management are generally good and staff are clear about their roles and responsibilities. They work well together as a team. There is a strong commitment to developing and improving practice. Staff are positive about training and regularly attend courses to further develop their knowledge and improve their practice however the assessment of the quality of the nursery education is not always accurate. Partnership with parents is generally good. Parents and staff have a friendly relationship. They are given clear written information about the group when their children start and receive regular newsletters. There are twice yearly parents evenings and the key worker system ensures parents are kept informed of their child's progress and achievements. There is no formal method in place to encourage parents to become involved in their children's learning.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children have regular opportunities to develop their physical skills both in the outdoor area and in the school hall. They use a wide range of tools and equipment with skill and dexterity. • Children are motivated, active learners. They benefit from staff's consistent interest and interaction in their play and learning. • Children are able to investigate and explore objects and materials. They observe differences and change in living and man-made materials.

p.3

What needs to be improved?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • the use of assessments to ensure children move to the next stage in their learning and are offered appropriate challenges • the use of daily routines and activities to develop children's learning in all areas of the curriculum • opportunities for children to use their imagination in movement, dance and music.

p.3

What has improved since the last inspection?

The setting has made limited progress since the last inspection. The assessment system has been improved but there is still not formal method of ensuring assessment informs planning. There has been an increase in the use of labelling and 'writing' in role-play situations but older and more able children are still not offered sufficient challenge in this area. Number lines and counting rhymes have been introduced but daily routines and activities are still not used well to promote number recognition and to encourage children to use mathematics to solve problems. Staff now have a good awareness of the Code of Practice for the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children are developing self-confidence and are eager to learn. They are able to speak confidently in a group and sit quietly and listen when appropriate. They are forming good relationships with children and adults and are learning to take turns and to share however children have not yet developed the confidence, independence and concentration skills to progress activities without adult support.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children are confident, able talkers. They are learning to use speech to communicate and to explore experiences. They enjoy listening to stories in small and large groups. However opportunities are missed in daily routines for children to recognise their own names and learn to write them.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children are learning to count to 10. They use language well to describe shape, position, size and quantity. They are able to re-create simple patterns. However daily activities are not used well to encourage children to count, to compare numbers and to use mathematics to solve problems.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Children investigate and explore objects and materials. They observe differences and change in living and man-made environments. They construct and build with a range of materials. Outings and trips as well as topic work help children to develop a sense of place and time. There are few opportunities for children to construct and build selecting resources, tools and techniques themselves.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Children move confidently and safely both inside the nursery and in the outdoor play area. They have regular opportunities to develop skills in manoeuvring wheeled toys and in climbing and balancing. They use a wide range of tools and equipment with confidence and are learning about their bodies and the importance of staying healthy.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children are learning to explore colour, texture, shape and form in planned activities. Free painting is available daily for the children. They sing simple songs from memory and use their imagination in role-play activities. Opportunities to move to music and to use musical instruments are limited.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• Use assessments to ensure children move to the next stage in their learning. • Make use of daily routines and activities to develop children's learning in all areas of the curriculum. • Create opportunities for children to use their imagination in music, dance and movement.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion