Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

St Peter And St Mary's Pre-school

Inspected 10 Nov 2004 · published 6 Feb 2005 · URN 251655

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Julie Youngman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    10 Nov 2004

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Julie Youngman

  • Postcode verified

    IP14 1LS

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    251655

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentenjoyconfidentlyskilfullyweaknessessecurestrongwell planned
Criticismtoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings142w+33
  • What needs to improve522w+87

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
659
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 35%About the inspection 56%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 10/11/2004 Inspector Name Julie Youngman (TCCI)

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Sessional Day Care Setting Name St Peter And St Mary's Pre-school Setting Address St Mary's Community Centre Silverdale Avenue Stowmarket Suffolk IP14 1LS

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

Name The Committee of St Peter And St Mary's Preschool

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name St Peter And St Mary's Preschool Address St Mary's Community Centre Silverdale Avenue Stowmarket Suffolk IP14 1LS

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

St Peter and St Mary's Pre-school is a church committee run community group which is based in St Mary's Community Centre which is situated not far from the town centre of Stowmarket in Suffolk. The playgroup has been registered for over 30 years and can accommodate 24 children. Children are accepted into the provision in the term they are three. The group currently operates for five sessions per week. The group supports children who may have special needs and who's first language is not English. There are nine regular members of staff employed to work with the children, four of these staff hold recognised child care qualifications. There is no outdoor play area available so, to compensate, staff take children on regular outings.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

The provision for nursery education at St. Peter and St. Mary's pre-school is of high quality overall. It enables children to make very good progress in all six areas of learning. Staff demonstrate a very good knowledge and understanding of the Early Learning goals. They put strong emphasis on helping the children to feel secure and confident. Parents are welcomed and encouraged to be involved. Sensitive intervention and good questioning by staff extends learning in all areas. Children collected autumn leaves on a walk. These were used for creating rubbing pictures. The activity was extended to develop language about size, shape and pattern and to talk about stories with plants like "Jack and the Beanstalk". Planning is effective and generally works very well but does not include enough opportunities for children to be involved in singing and rhymes. Parents are welcomed into the setting and are involved in their children's learning.

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

They are given plenty of good information about how their children learn through the Foundation Stage. Good communication means that parents often share what they know about their child. Strong leadership is demonstrated by the manager. Experienced and very capable senior staff lead by example. Staff are involved in training, both in the setting and on courses. They are a very effective team, each taking responsibility for a particular area, and supporting each other throughout the session. The pre-school is dedicated to improving the care and education of all the children. They are embarked on a quality assurance scheme.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children are making very good progress in personal, social and emotional development because staff are very good role models. Children demonstrate confidence and self esteem. Staff praise the children's achievements. They value their attempts to make sense of the world and to gain understanding. Staff respect the children's own ideas, views and needs. They encourage them to build good relationships and develop a sense of belonging. • Children are confident to join in conversations encouraged by responsive adults who question sensitively to develop their speech and language. Children talk about all areas of learning with growing vocabulary and increasing knowledge. • Staff skilfully support the children to develop their confidence and understanding of mathematical ideas. Normal daily activities are optimised to give rich opportunities to count and learn about number and mathematical language.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • The leadership and management of the pre-school is focussed on improving the provision of education for all the children through working towards a kite mark.

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• emphasis in planning for children to join in songs and rhymes in each session • strategies for changeover times during sessions so that children feel secure when moving from free play to working altogether in directed activities

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

All the key issues from the inspection in December 2000 are well addressed. Many good activities are planned for the 4 year olds to learn the sound of letters. Staff effectively use the children's play to develop learning about simple calculations. There are good resources and effective support for children to learn about information technology and how and why things work.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Strong emphasis is given to developing positive attitudes. Staff are happy and enthusiastic and the children are motivated to learn. Children move around confidently to access all the activities, sometimes working with an adult, sometimes on their own and sometimes with a group of friends. Staff are excellent role models and support the children to behave well. However, not all the children feel secure when gathered together for a directed activity.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Very Good Children are given many excellent opportunities to develop language for communication. They talk to each other and the adults about events, feelings and ideas. Staff promote learning about the sound and shape of letters and some words. Children are learning to write their names. Staff support the children to value and enjoy books.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Children are consolidating and extending their learning about mathematics through excellent well planned activities. Staff skilfully weave mathematical ideas and vocabulary into the children's play across all areas of learning. Children spontaneously count and confidently talk about numbers, space and shape. They show confidence and enthusiasm when talking about and doing mathematical activities.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Very Good The children have many good opportunities to explore and investigate materials and objects. Shaving foam created a excellent fun way for the children to learn through their senses. A walk produced some Autumn leaves which were skilfully used to create rubbing pictures. Staff extended the activity for the children to also explore the shapes, sizes and patterns of the leaves. Children are learning about information and communication technology through a good range of equipment.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Many good activities are planned that successfully develop the children's small and large movements. They use different materials, tools and equipment with growing skills and safety. The room is well organised to give space for imaginative play. The children respond well to the many 'music and movement' activities that are provided. They enjoy moving with ribbons to music and doing the 'Okki Kokki'.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good The children are learning to express their ideas and feelings through activities involving a good variety of media and materials. The children enjoy using their senses in lots of 'messy' play. They are confident to sing songs from memory on their own. The children enthusiastically respond to music. Planning included too few opportunities to learn through songs and rhymes.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of high quality. Children are making very good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT

There are no significant weaknesses to report, but considerations should be given to improving the following: • There are no significant weaknesses to report, but consideration should be given to the following: • give more emphasis in planning for children to join in songs and rhymes in each session • develop strategies for changeover times during sessions so that children feel secure when moving from free play to working altogether in directed activities

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion