Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Polperro Primary Academy

Inspected 11 Nov 2004 · published 19 Jan 2005 · URN 142953

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Mary Daniel

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    11 Nov 2004

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Mary Daniel

  • Postcode verified

    TA19 9EX

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    142953

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentlyenjoygood progressstrengthsenjoymentdelightclearly
Criticismweaknessesweaknessnot alwaysnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings143w−45
  • What needs to improve562w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
699
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 35%About the inspection 56%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 11/11/2004 Inspector Name Mary Daniel

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Full Day Care Setting Name Merryfield Preschool Setting Address St Mary & St Peter First Schl Copse Lane Ilton Somerset TA19 9EX

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name Merryfield Pre-School Address St Mary & St Peter First School Copse Lane, Ilton Ilminster Somerset TA19 9EX

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

Merryfield Pre-School operates from a portacabin situated in the grounds of the St Mary and St Peter First School in the village of Ilton. There is an enclosed tarmac playground and surrounding grass areas available for outdoor play. This parent-committee run pre-school is open from Monday to Friday from 09:00 - 13:15 term time only. The group morning session runs until 12:15, with the option for children to stay on for an extended period for lunch. A maximum of 20 children may attend at any one time, and there are currently 18 children on register. The pre-school is registered to receive Government funding and there are currently six funded children on roll. The group support children with special educational needs and those with English as an additional language. A total of five childcare staff are employed. The Manager and Deputy both have Early Years Childcare and Education qualifications. The group receive support from

p.2

Information about the setting

the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

Merryfield Pre-School offers good quality nursery education overall and children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. Teaching is generally good. Staff form good relationships with children, which impacts well on children's learning, particularly at circle time when children listen attentively and enjoy telling their news to the group 'Teddy'. Staff provide purposeful play activities to encourage children's learning, for example, hiding a variety of interesting objects in the sand for them to explore. However, the overall planning and assessment system does not fully support staff in setting suitable challenges for children in all areas of their learning. Overall, staff maintain clear daily routines, which positively contribute to helping children feel secure in the setting, but the organisation of some times during the session does not effectively maximise the learning opportunities for children. Staff ask 'how and why?', for example, when

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

reading a group story, which helps children think for themselves. Staff respond well to children's ideas in play, such as developing a painting activity to make a treasure map for them to explore. Staff give clear explanations and use praise often, which results in children behaving very well. Leadership and management is generally good. Overall, there are firm procedures in place to support staff in working well as a team, and give clear areas of responsibility. The supportive parent committee meet regularly with staff, but there is no formal system in place to identify or monitor any areas for improvement . Partnership with parents is generally good. Good relationships are formed with parents and their involvement is welcomed within the group. They are kept well informed of current events and changes, but have limited information offered on their child's daily activities, or on how each stage of their progress has been achieved.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Staff use effective questioning well. Staff ask open-ended questions to support children in learning to think for themselves, for example, as they ask children about a favourite book 'where do you think these animals would live?' and 'which animal has a baby like this? • Children settle easily and happily make attachments to others. They are willing to try out new experiences and take turns appropriately. Children use good manners independently, for example, as they ask politely for some more fruit at snack time. • Children behave very well and show an understanding of the group expectations. They listen to staff and show respect for others as they patiently line up and wait for others to join them for their outside play.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • Children enjoy their songs and rhymes. They join in enthusiastically as they sing 'five fat sausages' and they all clap their hands hard to make the ' 5 fat sausages go BANG!!'

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• the system of recording children's developmental progress and planning challenges for individuals • the organisation of some parts of the session to maximise the learning opportunities for all children • the systems for monitoring and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the overall provision.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children settle easily and explore the play areas with interest. They sit quietly at circle time and willingly respond to their names. Children make attachments to others in their role play games, but are not always effectively supported to develop concentration in other activities. They take turns to tell the group teddy their news and often use good manners. Children celebrate community events together and join with the local school to raise money for charity.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children enthusiastically join in with favourite songs and repeated refrains. Most children use language confidently to express their thoughts, for example, in discussing recent firework displays, but they are seldom linking sounds with letters. Children are developing their hand-eye co-ordination skills well in planned activities, such as when using scissors or paint brushes. They enjoy the group story, but are not encouraged to look at books independently due to organisation of the book area.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children are often using numbers spontaneously in play, for example, as they count how many pieces of apple they have eaten at snack time. They sing songs such as '5 fat sausages' and count how many are left, but are not regularly building on these skills or becoming aware of written numbers in play. Children recognise squares and triangles on the computer programme. They use positional language well in the story of the 'bear hunt' and decide whether they can go under, over or through the river.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Children explore with enjoyment as they collect conkers, and dig for worms. They find sycamore seeds to fly like helicopters and discover change as they make play dough. Children show interest in how and why things happen as they make bubbles in water play. They see how others live through topical activities, but their awareness of further aspects of diversity is not promoted as well. Children happily investigate construction materials, and join the train track together.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children move confidently around the play ground, most pedalling their bikes with pleasure. They balance with care in the obstacle course, but do not regularly develop these skills further in more structured and challenging tasks. Children recognise their own needs as they realise their hands need washing after painting. Children develop good hand-eye co-ordination as they roll out their play dough and they carefully pour out their own drinks at snack time.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children enjoy exploring colour and texture, such as with marble painting, when they see the colours mix together. Children move in different ways as they do foot painting to the music. Children use their imagination well as they become involved in their role play. They show interest in creative activities but cannot always independently access a good variety of materials to express or support their own ideas in play. Children show delight as they make 'wibble, wobble' moves to the jelly song.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• improve upon the organisation of some parts of the session to maximise children's learning opportunities, and to encourage their overall concentration and interest • extend the assessment system to ensure all areas of children's achievements are clearly evidenced to sufficiently inform staff in setting suitable levels of challenge in the planning of further activities • develop a system to monitor and evaluate the overall provision to allow weakness to be identified and improvements made.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion