Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Manor School

Inspected 18 Jan 2005 · published 17 Mar 2005 · URN 144053

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Patricia Chapman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Jan 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Patricia Chapman

  • Postcode verified

    SE27 9JP

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    144053

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressengagingindependentconfidentlyenthusiasmwell supportedsuccessfullyrigorous
Criticismlimitedinconsistentnot alwaysmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings137w+11
  • What needs to improve615w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
746
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 40%About the inspection 52%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 18/01/2005 Inspector Name Patricia Chapman

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Sessional Day Care Setting Name Dunelm Grove Pre-School Setting Address 23 Dunelm Grove West Norwood London SE27 9JP

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

Name The Committee of Dunelm Grove Pre-School 1030730

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name Dunelm Grove Pre-School Address 23 Dunelm Grove London SE27 9JP

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

Dunelm Grove Pre-School Playgroup has been registered since 1993. It operates from purpose built premises comprising of a large playroom with small adjacent areas at each end of the play room. All facilities are situated on the ground floor. The children have use of a secure garden area adjacent to the indoor play area. It is situated close to West Norwood Station in the London Borough of Lambeth There are currently 35 children on role who attend both part time and full time, of these 25 receive funded education grant. At present 2 children attend with special needs. The pre-school caters for children in the local vicinity and is open from 09:30 to 15:30 term time only. Four staff work with the children. Three staff hold childcare qualifications and 1 member of staff is currently working towards NVQ2. The nursery recives support from the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership.(EYDCP)

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

The children are making satisfactory progress towards the early learning goals. The quality of teaching is generally good. Adult led activities, themes and projects undertaken with the children are well planned to provide a range of interesting activities to extend the children's knowledge. A record is kept of children's achievements across the six areas of learning, although the next stage of children's learning is not systematically established and recorded. This sometimes leads to missed opportunities to extend the children's learning. Staff deployment and the organisation of resources does not yet fully support the children to be independent in their learning and use resources in an imaginative and creative way. The outdoor area is used well to promote the children's physical development and other areas of learning The partnership with parents is generally good. Parents are well informed of the nursery's policies and procedures and have access to files which outline what their

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

children have learnt. However the lack of clearly written information of the next stage of children's individual learning limits their ability to work in partnership with staff to support the children's learning. Parents report that they are happy with the care and education their children receive The leadership and management of the nursery is generally good. A comprehensive range of policies and procedures are in place which are implemented by all members of staff. Staff meetings are held to plan themes, projects and daily activities. The manager is committed to improving practice and is currently developing a system to identify the next stage of children's learning so she can monitor their progress more systematically and identify the strengths and weaknesses of teaching. A training programme is in place to develop staff's practice.

p.3

What is being done well?

• adult led activities centred around themes and project are well planned a provide opportunities for children to develop their knowledge and understanding • the outdoor area is used well to promote the children's physical skills and other areas of learning • the staff manage the children's behaviour well and encourage them to interact with each other in a positive and co-operative way • the strong commitment of the manager to improve practice which is identified in the long term planning

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• the identification of the next stage in children's learning • staff support to extend children's learning in practical and group activities • the organisation of resources to support children's independent learning and enable them to consolidate newly learnt skills on a daily basis

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

Generally good progress has been made since the last inspection. records are now compiled outlining what the children have learnt across the six areas of learning older children are given opportunities to learn the sounds of letters of the alphabet to begin to build simple words children have frequent opportunities to count, however they still have limited opportunities to solve practical mathematical problems during every day activities and daily routines

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children interact confidently with each other and are able to take turns and share equipment. They respond with enthusiasm to a variety of experiences. They are increasingly aware of their own and others needs and they behave well. Children show independence when dressing for outside activities. However, the inconsistent organisation of resources limits the children's independent learning and the ability to consolidate their newly learnt skills on a daily basis.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children show increasing confidence when communicating verbally and frequently express their own thoughts and feelings. They have access to a range of reference and story books, but staff deployment does not always ensure staff are on hand to support children's appreciation of stories and finding information from reference books. Older children use well formed letters to write their names and understand the purpose of writing, they are encouraged to link sounds to letters.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Older children are able to recognise numerals and are able to count reliable up to ten and beyond. They are encouraged to talk about size and shape and have good opportunities to use positional language when playing on the climbing frame. They frequently talk about size and shape when playing with dough. Older children are seldom encouraged to add and subtract and there are missed opportunities to develop children's maths skills while engaging in role play activities such as the home corner.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Children have good opportunities to learn about different cultures and have undertaken activities centred around Eid and Divali. They undertake regular cooking activities and appreciate how materials change when mixed together. Children are well supported to use the computer and can work through programmes with good control of the mouse. Children have limited opportunities to learn about features in the place they live and limited opportunities to design and construct using a range of materials.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children have regular opportunities to move their bodies in an imaginative and controlled way and to extend their ability by climbing, crawling and manoeuvring equipment, particularly around the garden area. Children use a range of small tools successfully such as pencils, scissors, rolling pins and jugs for pouring. Children learn about changes to their bodies when active but have limited opportunities to learn about a healthy diet to stay healthy.

p.6

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children have good opportunities to develop their own creative ideas in the outdoor area. They are able to explore materials to develop their understanding of shape, texture and space. They have regular opportunities to dance, sing songs and listen to music. They respond to what they see, taste, touch and feel while engaging in activities such as cooking. The limited resources and adult support limits the development of the children's learning while engaging in role play in the home corner.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• develop the record keeping system to ensure that the next steps in children's individual learning are identified across the six areas of learning • introduce a rigorous system to monitor and evaluate the quality of teaching •• ensure that the deployment of staff and organisation of resources are organised to support the children's independent learning and support them to consolidate their newly learnt skills on a daily basis

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion