Other · Ofsted report
Cherry Tree Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
17 Nov 2004
- Inspectorssingle source
Name Marilyn Ashley
- Postcode verified
WF1 3LQ
- Name on report verified
NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT
- URN verified
322072
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Poor progress has been made since the last inspection. p.4
- The improvement of staff's understanding of the effectiveness of the curriculum plans to ensure the development of children's skills and individual challenge and staff deployment, which was a key issue last time, has been limited. p.4
- Children's progress is not tracked or observed to inform future planning and focussed activities are not differentiated to ensure children's individual progress and challenge. p.4
- Staff are not deployed effectively to ensure children are supported in their learning and development. p.4
- The routines and the grouping of children limit the length of time children have to develop and progress as individuals. p.4
- The organisation and presentation of the learning environment, does not enable children to learn or progress. p.4
- Despite intensive support from an advisory teacher the continuous provision still does not provide stimulating learning opportunities for p.4
- The routine limits children's freedom of choice of activities and the opportunity to develop their own learning and independence. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes7
“Poor progress has been made since the last inspection.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 958
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
INSPECTION DETAILS
Inspection Date 17/11/2004 Inspector Name Marilyn Ashley
p.1
SETTING DETAILS
Day Care Type Full Day Care Setting Name Cherry Tree Day Nursery Setting Address 16-18 Upper York Street Wakefield West Yorkshire WF1 3LQ
p.1
REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS
Name The partnership of Pauline Webster and Amanda Lodge
p.1
ORGANISATION DETAILS
Name Pauline Webster and Amanda Lodge Address 16-18 Upper York Street Wakefield West Yorkshire WF1 3LQ
p.1
ORGANISATION DETAILS
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.1
ABOUT THE INSPECTION
The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.
p.2
Information about the setting
Cherry Tree Day Nursery registered in 1998 and is a private organisation managed by two partners. It is located in a listed building, on the outskirts of Wakefield town centre where there are good transport links to surrounding areas. Children aged over three years are accommodated on the ground floor in two rooms with an additional dining area and bathroom facility. The children have access to a fully enclosed outdoor play area to the rear of the building. Cherry Tree Nursery serves families from the local and wider community. The nursery opens Monday to Friday, and occasional Saturdays, all year round. Sessions are from 07:00 until 19:00. Children attend full or part-time. There are currently 52 children on roll, 14 of which are in receipt of nursery education funding. There are eight full time staff employed and all staff hold an appropriate early years qualification. The setting receives support from an advisory
p.2
Information about the setting
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.2
How effective is the nursery education?
Provision at Cherry Tree Nursery is unacceptable. Children are making poor progress towards the early learning goals (ELG’s). The quality of teaching is poor. All staff have a limited knowledge and understanding of the stepping stones and early learning goals in practice, in all areas of learning. The learning environment is uninviting and does not support children's motivation, developing independence or self chosen learning. Planned activities are mundane, with very few first hand experiences included. Adult directed and designed activities, and a restrictive routine limit children's free expression, particularly in creative development. Limited planning for the outdoors restricts children's progress in all areas of learning. Staff have difficulty in managing some children's behaviour which limits the learning opportunities for all children. Staff are badly deployed and their use of time severely limits children's opportunities to progress or feel supported in
p.3
How effective is the nursery education?
their emotional development. Children's learning is not tracked, observed or assessed against the stepping stones and ELG’s. Information on children's learning is not used in forward planning for their individual progress and challenge. Records do not give a clear picture of children's progress to share with parents. The leadership and management of the nursery is poor. There has been a rapid turn over of staff, but the leadership have not taken the responsibility to ensure the development and progress of the setting. Staff are not supported effectively in developing good practice. The monitoring and evaluation of the nursery education and setting is poor. Partnership with parents has significant weaknesses. Staff are supportive of parents care needs but do not involve them in their children's learning effectively. Information is shared, but parents understanding of the stepping stones and Foundation Stage
p.3
How effective is the nursery education?
limits their contribution to their children's learning and progress.
p.3
What is being done well?
• Staff form warm relationships with parents and are supportive of their changing care needs and those of their children. • Children enjoy and join in with their favourite rhymes. Some children are beginning to write their names.
p.3
What needs to be improved?
• the learning environment • all staff's understanding of the stepping stones and early learning goals in practice in the six areas of learning
p.3
What needs to be improved?
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • the planning, observation and recording of children's learning • the monitoring and evaluation of the learning and teaching and the nursery education provision • staff's management of children's behaviour • the opportunities for children to write for a purpose and to explore and represent numbers.
p.3
What has improved since the last inspection?
Poor progress has been made since the last inspection. The improvement of staff's understanding of the effectiveness of the curriculum plans to ensure the development of children's skills and individual challenge and staff deployment, which was a key issue last time, has been limited. Children's progress is not tracked or observed to inform future planning and focussed activities are not differentiated to ensure children's individual progress and challenge. Staff are not deployed effectively to ensure children are supported in their learning and development. The routines and the grouping of children limit the length of time children have to develop and progress as individuals. The organisation and presentation of the learning environment, does not enable children to learn or progress. Despite intensive support from an advisory teacher the continuous provision still does not provide stimulating learning opportunities for
p.4
What has improved since the last inspection?
children. The routine limits children's freedom of choice of activities and the opportunity to develop their own learning and independence. A poor range of accessible resources and activities dampens children's natural enthusiasm for learning and does not support their emotional or social needs and development. Opportunities to develop their imagination, particularly in role play, are severely limited. Neither the learning environment nor the staff, support children's developing literacy and mathematical skills. Opportunities to write for a purpose, to practise their emergent writing and numeracy skills in everyday play activities, particularly role play, are still severely limited. A poorly resourced mark making area, book area and print limited environment, limits children's development and their understanding that print carries meaning. Information for parents on the Foundation Stage curriculum in practice and their
p.4
What has improved since the last inspection?
understanding of children's progress through the stepping stones and early learning goals is still limited.
p.4
What has improved since the last inspection?
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.4
PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Some children are beginning to play together in games, but others do not behave well and are not being helped sufficiently to show care and concern for the needs of others. The environment and restrictive routine does not enable children to share their needs and feelings. A lack of exciting experiences is limiting children's opportunities to develop a positive attitude to learning. Opportunities to select their own resources, to develop their independence and self chosen learning are limited.
p.5
COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY
Judgement: Poor Children enjoy and join in their favourite rhymes, but an uninviting book corner and access to a poor range of books and stories limit their understanding and love of print. Some children are beginning to write their own names, but opportunities to develop their emergent writing skills and explore letter sounds in everyday play, particularly role play, are limited. Children lack time, encouragement and a rich environment in order to talk, explore and extend their thinking and understanding.
p.5
MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Poor Some children can count to 5 and recognise numbers to 6.They play with telephones and enjoy rhymes, but opportunities to explore and represent numbers in everyday play are limited. Children enjoy baking, but staff do not extend their learning through weighing and measuring. Children explore shapes but not in the environment. Planned and spontaneous opportunities for children to explore mathematical language and to solve problems through practical activities are not exploited sufficiently.
p.5
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD
Judgement: Poor Children enjoy the computer and use the mouse with increasing control. They look at changes in the seasons, but opportunities to investigate, observe and find out first hand why things happen and how things work are limited. Children enjoyed the puppies' visit but further opportunities to find out about the local area through interesting visitors, visits and photographs are severely limited. Finding out about their families' lives and sharing significant events are not extended sufficiently.
p.5
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.5
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Poor Children have an awareness of hygiene and their own personal needs. They access a range of equipment in the outdoor area, but planned activities and time to develop and extend their skills, control and coordination are limited. Indoors there is insufficient free access to a range of tools and equipment to develop their confidence, coordination and skills. The indoor learning environment is not extended to the outdoors to ensure children's learning and challenge in all areas of the curriculum.
p.6
CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Poor Children draw and paint themselves and others, but have little opportunity to explore a range of materials independently. Adult directed and designed activities limit their freedom to express themselves in art, design, music, dance and stories. Role play opportunities are poorly resourced, limiting their imagination and learning. Planned opportunities to develop and extend children's exploration of music and movement and to respond to exciting activities using their senses are limited.
p.6
Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is not fostered
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.6
OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION
The provision is unacceptable. Children are making poor progress towards the early learning goals.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
• increase all staff's knowledge and understanding of the stepping stones and early learning goals in practice in the six areas of learning • develop the organisation of the nursery, through support and advice, to create a stimulating, inviting environment that supports children's developing independence and enables their self chosen learning and challenge • extend the planning, observation and recording of children's learning, to inform future planning and to ensure the progress and challenge of all children • develop a rigorous system to monitor and evaluate the quality of learning and teaching and the nursery education provision.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
The provider must draw up an action plan within 20 working days showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. A copy of the action plan must be sent to the local education authority. The Department for Education and Skills will write to the provider asking for a copy of the action plan. The Secretary for Education and Skills will then decide whether to withdraw the provider's entitlement to receive funding for nursery education.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion