Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Beeches Primary School

Inspected 24 Jun 2004 · published 25 Sept 2004 · URN 127535

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Beth Kingsland

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Jun 2004

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Beth Kingsland

  • Postcode verified

    CT15 7LJ

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    127535

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−65Very criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivepositiveconfidentlyenjoy
Criticismlimitedpoorfailweaknesseslackinsufficientnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings179w+20
  • What needs to improve544w−74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
714
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%What needs to improve 36%About the inspection 52%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 24/06/2004 Inspector Name Beth Kingsland

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Sessional Day Care Setting Name Shepherdswell Playgroup Setting Address Village Hall Cox Hill, Shepherdswell Dover Kent CT15 7LJ

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

Name The Committee of Shepherdswell Playgroup

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name Shepherdswell Playgroup Address Shepherdswell Village Hall Cox Hill, Shepherdswell Dover Kent CT15 7NH

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

Shepherdswell Playgroup is a committee run pre-school that first opened in 1972. The playgroup is situated within the rural village of Shepherdswell, and occupies premises within the village hall. The playgroup serves families from the local community and the wider surrounding area. There are currently 32 children on roll, 9 of whom are funded 3-year-olds and 15 of whom are funded 4-year-olds. The playgroup has experience in providing for children with identified special needs. Currently, none of the children speak English as an additional language. The playgroup is open each weekday from 09.15 to 15.00. There are eight staff who work with the children on a rota basis, five of whom hold an early years qualification and have attended short courses. Three members of staff are currently attending qualification courses. The group receives support from a Pre-School Learning Alliance development worker and a teacher from the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

Shepherdswell Playgroup provision is acceptable but has some significant areas for improvement. Children’s progress towards the early learning goals is limited by some significant weaknesses. The overall quality of teaching has significant weaknesses. Although staff generally work positively with children, encouraging them to be confident, their lack of knowledge and understanding of the early learning goals, inhibits children's progress, including those children with identified special educational needs. Although staff provide a range of activities throughout the session, they do not generally challenge children during the activities they complete. As a result activities lack opportunities for children to use their imaginations to solve a range of practical problems. Staff are not always effectively deployed to extend and develop children's learning within the programmes for personal and social, mathematical and creative

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

development. Staff provide insufficient opportunities for children to use their initiative to develop their own ideas and to independently select from the wide selection of resources. The effectiveness of assessment and curriculum planning has significant weaknesses. Staff do not make effective use of assessment in order to inform the planning of activities. The overall quality of leadership and management has significant weaknesses. Although weaknesses have been identified within the management of the setting, no procedures have been implemented in order to evaluate and review the effectiveness of the playgroup practice. The partnership with parents and carers is generally good. Parents are greeted warmly by staff and receive informal opportunities to learn about children's progress and attainment. Parents regularly help out within the session. Although staff provide parents with information about the setting and its provision, they receive insufficient

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

opportunities to learn about the full range of activities provided.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children are provided with regular opportunities to find their names. Children independently identify their names throughout the daily session. • Staff are beginning to question children during the activities they complete. Children communicate and express their ideas freely throughout the session. • Children know each other well. They are confident and have developed good relationships together.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• staff's knowledge and understanding of the early learning goals for personal, social and emotional, mathematics and creative development • the use of assessment in order to identify what children need to learn next and to guide planning • the organisation of activities, and staff deployment, throughout the session, in order to effectively, question, challenge, manage and support all children during the activities they complete • the leadership and management of the setting • the partnership with parents and carers.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

The playgroup has made limited progress in addressing the key issues highlighted from the previous inspection. This has had a poor impact on children's learning and development. Staff have not given priority to the planning, teaching and assessment of children's progress within the programme of mathematics. Children receive limited opportunities to take part in practical mathematical activities that allow them to solve simple problems.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Some positive relationships have been developed within the playgroup. Children generally work well together, showing some levels of confidence. They are generally encouraged towards personal independence; however, opportunities for them to select resources for themselves are limited. The children generally behave well, however, the lack of effective planning and management of the activities result in children becoming restless, for example, at circle time.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children speak confidently together in groups, communicating their ideas during free-play. They receive good opportunities to use and enjoy books. Children are provided with opportunities to access a variety of equipment to write as part of their play. Staff do not make effective use of planned discussion activities to develop and extend children's language skills. Although children are introduced to letters of the alphabet, staff fail to support this through practical learning.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Poor Children receive some opportunities to count and recognise shapes as part of formal activities. A good range of mathematical equipment is available within the playgroup. However, staff fail to provide opportunities for children to solve simple problems as part of practical and free-play activities. Staff exhibit a limited knowledge of the stepping stones within this area of learning.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Children are able to access a variety of equipment for construction. Staff provide a range of formal investigation activities that allow children to explore the properties of different materials. However, staff fail to effectively challenge children during free investigation activities. Children receive insufficient opportunities to learn about everyday technology.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children receive regular opportunities to move safely and freely both inside and out. This provides them with opportunities to show an awareness of themselves and others. Good opportunities are provided for children to develop their small manipulative skills. However, staff do not use information from children's assessment to develop their skills further.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Poor The children receive insufficient opportunities to respond to a variety of experiences. Staff lead many of the provided activities, with children receiving limited opportunities to express their own ideas. The lack of planned activities and access to a range of materials and tools inhibits opportunities for children to communicate their ideas, thoughts and feelings.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable but has some significant areas for improvement. Children's progress towards the early learning goals is limited by some significant weaknesses. The next inspection will take place in one to two years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• increase all staff's knowledge and understanding of how to plan, use and extend daily activities and routines to help children make effective progress towards the early learning goals within personal, social and emotional, mathematical and creative development • make effective use of assessment in order to identify individual children's next steps in learning and use any information gained from assessment to inform the planning of activities • increase the effectiveness with which staff support children, by providing regular opportunities for children to use their initiative throughout the daily routine • develop the leadership and management of the setting in order to support staff with the care they provide to children.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion