Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Harden Infant School

Inspected 9 Feb 2004 · published 15 May 2004 · URN 127184

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Annie Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Feb 2004

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Annie Williams

  • Postcode verified

    CT9 1UA

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    127184

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressgood progresspositivecaringhappywell behavedconfidentlyenjoy
Criticismnot consistentlylackweaknessesmissedlimitednot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings154w0
  • What needs to improve671w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
817
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 50%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 09/02/2004 Inspector Name Annie Williams

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Full Day Care Setting Name First Steps Nursery Setting Address 25-29 Thanet Road Margate Kent CT9 1UA

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

First Steps Nursery opened in 1994. It operates from a converted church and an attached house. The nursery has access to six rooms, an office, toilets, a kitchen and an outside area. The nursery serves the local area and surrounding towns. The nursery is registered to provide a hundred places for children aged under eight years. There are currently eighty-eight funded children on roll. This includes thirty-eight funded four-year-olds and fifty funded three-year-olds. Children attend a variety of sessions each week. The nursery staff have experience of working with children who have special needs and children who speak English as an additional language. The nursery opens five days each week throughout the year. Sessions last from 07:30 to 18:00. Parents provide a packed lunch. There are nine staff working with the funded children. All have an early years qualification and attend short courses. The nursery receives support from a teacher

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

First Steps Nursery provides a caring and welcoming environment for children. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. Teaching is generally good in most areas of learning. There is a good range of resources to support children's progress but systems are not in place to monitor their use. Staff encourage and support children's behaviour. Children are confident, show consideration for others and are generally well behaved. The staff take responsibility for the long term planning. However this does not relate to the six areas of learning and the related aspects, consequently it is difficult to ensure all six areas are given equal emphasis. Planning for daily activities is in place but not yet fully effective with useful information to develop individual children's progress. The system for assessment of children's progress is developing but it does not yet identify what

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

children need to learn next. Staff are familiar with the Code of Practice for the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs and there are appropriate monitoring systems in place, however the Individual action plans are not yet linked to the stepping-stones. Leadership and management is generally good. The management, supervisors and staff have worked hard to develop a strong team and are committed to providing opportunities for staff development. They are beginning to develop their role in monitoring the effectiveness of the nursery practice through observations and appraisal systems. Systems for evaluating and reviewing the service are not yet fully developed. The partnership with parents is generally good. Staff provide information about the setting and it's provision and greet parents warmly. Parents receive regular newsletters and are welcomed into the group. Opportunities are developing for

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

parents to learn about their children's attainments and progress within the curriculum, for example planned consultation meetings with key-workers.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children receive regular opportunities to count and recognise numbers and shape as part of the daily session. • Children receive regular opportunities to recognise and write their names as part of the daily session. Staff provide an environment that reflects the importance of language through notices and labels. Children speak clearly and confidently as they engage both adults and their friends in conversation. • Children receive good opportunities to find out about features of the local and wider world. • Staff provide worthwhile and interesting activities that promote children's creativity through exploring materials with their senses.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • Staff encourage four year olds to use Information and communication technology and make regular use of the computer.

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• the systems for reviewing and evaluating the nursery practice • the individual action plans • the use of the book corner in both rooms and the computer area in the blue room • opportunities for more practical mathematical activities in the 'free-play' session covering all the aspects • the system for planning and assessment.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

Following the last inspection there were no significant weaknesses to report, but the nursery was asked that the following points for development be considered in the action plan: Further improve the provision for language and literacy by ensuring that there is more emphasis on children writing their own names. Children now receive regular opportunities to practise writing their name for a purpose such as labelling work. Further improve the partnership with parents and carers by including details of the six areas of the educational programme and the desirable learning outcomes next time the prospectus is revised. The parents information board leading to both the funded three and four year old areas now display photographs and information about the six areas of learning, however the prospectus does not refer to the six areas of learning.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Many positive relationships are made in the nursery. Children are able to work in groups and learn to take turns and share. Staff provide a secure, friendly and caring setting, which builds children's confidence and self-esteem, helping them to make good progress towards the early learning goals. Children are happy, settled, concentrate for appropriate times and generally well behaved. Staff miss some opportunities to develop children's independence for example snack time and self-selection.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Staff provide an environment that reflects the importance of language through notices and labels. Children speak confidently as they engage both adults and their friends in conversation. Opportunities for writing and recognising letters are available. Staff do not consistently, encourage children to transfer these skills in a variety of play situations. The positioning of the book area and lack of staff deployment results in children not making full use of this resource.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Children receive opportunities to count during the session and numbers are displayed. They practise naming shapes and numerals as part of the daily routine. A good range of mathematical equipment is available; staff do not consistently use 'mathematical' language to help children learn. Opportunities to encourage children to solve simple problems during practical activities and opportunities for children to learn about addition and subtraction in their play are missed.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Staff provide activities that encourage children to investigate a variety of materials. There are good opportunities for four year olds to use ICT and for all children to look closely at differences, patterns and change, for example changes to the African snail, mixtures when cooking and mixing corn flour. Staff provide good opportunities for children to explore, investigate and identify features of the local and wider world for example visits to the beach, library and park.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children's fine manipulative skills are developing well as they display good skills when threading, cutting, whisking, painting, drawing and constructing. Regular opportunities to use large equipment ensure that children move around safely, displaying a good awareness of themselves and others. Children learn about the importance of personal hygiene and healthy eating through discussion, displays, topics and regular hand washing.

p.6

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children respond in a variety of ways when exploring with their senses for example describing the corn flour as 'squidgy' and 'sticky' and comparing the feel of the snail shell to 'a potato'. Children learn to use their imaginations in role-play and enjoy the music and movement sessions. Children are sometimes limited in their use of imagination in art and design when staff present pre-drawn templates. Although there is a range of musical instruments staff do not make effective use of them.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• continue to develop effective use of observations in order to i) identify individual children's next steps in learning; ii) use any information gained from observations to inform the planning of activities • continue to develop planning to include a broad range of practical activities and details of i) what children are expected to learn; ii) the intended area of learning; iii) how staff will differentiate to develop individual children's progress • ensure teaching supports children's mathematical learning through purposeful practical activities throughout the 'free-play' session

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion