Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Jul 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sophie Wood

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Sophie Wood

  • Postcode verified

    ME15 6SX

Page 1 of 25
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentpositivecleareffectivelyoutstandingvery wellclearlysafe
Criticisminsufficientlyconcerningseriouslyunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings3630w+80
  • What needs to improve566w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
25
Words of findings
4,079
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

X10029.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 FOSTERING SERVICE

p.1

ME15 6SX

Lead Inspector Sophie Wood Announced Inspection 13th June 2006 10:00 Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 2 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to:

p.1

ME15 6SX

• Put the people who use social care first • Improve services and stamp out bad practice • Be an expert voice on social care • Practise what we preach in our own organisation

p.2

ME15 6SX

Reader Information Document Purpose Inspection Report Author CSCI Audience General Public Further copies from 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) Copyright This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Internet address www.csci.org.uk Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 3 This is a report of an inspection to assess whether services are meeting the needs of people who use them. The legal basis for conducting inspections is the Care Standards Act 2000 and the relevant National Minimum Standards for this establishment are those for Fostering Services. They can be found at www.dh.gov.uk or obtained from The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop

p.2

ME15 6SX

Every Child Matters, outlined the government’s vision for children’s services and formed the basis of the Children Act 2004. It provides a framework for inspection so that children’s services should be judged on their contribution to the outcomes considered essential to wellbeing in childhood and later life. Those outcomes are: • Being healthy • Staying safe • Enjoying and achieving • Making a contribution; and • Achieving economic wellbeing.

p.3

ME15 6SX

In response, the Commission for Social Care Inspection has re-ordered the national minimum standards for children’s services under the five outcomes, for reporting purposes. A further section has been created under ‘Management’ to cover those issues that will potentially impact on all the outcomes above.

p.3

ME15 6SX

Copies of Every Child Matters and The Children Act 2004 are available from The Stationery Office as above This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 4

p.3

Name of service

Address 69 College Road Maidstone Kent ME15 6SX

p.4

Name of service

Email address lynnstout@futures.for.children.org

p.4

manager (if applicable)

Type of registration Fostering Agencies Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 5

p.4

Conditions of registration:

Date of last inspection 14th February 2006

p.5

Brief Description of the Service:

The ‘Futures for Children’ fostering agency is based in Maidstone and is currently registering other offices in neighbouring counties. It is the intention of the agency to develop small groups of carers, from a wide range of geographical locations, with qualified staff support close by, in line their ‘Maidstone’ model. According to its Statement of Purpose, the agency seeks to provide, 'a flexible, caring and imaginative foster care service…to give children and young people the opportunity to become valued members of society'. The agency seeks to provide a variety of placements, based upon the presenting needs of the children / young people referred. These include; short and long term, emergencies, bridging, enhanced, eg. disability / illness, sibling groups and parent and child placements. All Social Workers employed by the agency are qualified and experienced and other employees include a qualified Director of Therapy and sessional workers.

p.5

Brief Description of the Service:

For those young people not in mainstream school, the agency funds a minimum of 10 hours sessional work per week. The agency provides continued training for carers and is currently focusing upon the NVQ qualification. Out of hours support is provided by the agency staff team via an on call system and carers receive three weeks’ holiday pay annually. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 6

p.5

SUMMARY

This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection.

p.6

SUMMARY

This announced key inspection commenced on 13 th June 2006 and was conducted over four days. Time was spent interviewing the registered manager and other key personnel. Written records were scrutinised and three sets of foster carers, including the children placed with them, were visited in their own homes. Additional inspection material was received through the manager’s returned pre – inspection documentation and the questionnaires received from carers, children and placing social workers. It was also very helpful to meet with a placing social worker during a carer visit, in order to fully explore a sibling placement, and holding a group meeting with carers and children, supplied additional pertinent information.

p.6

SUMMARY

The previous inspection visit, conducted in February this year, highlighted a number of areas requiring attention and it was positive to find from this visit, that every requirement had been either fully or partly addressed.

p.6

SUMMARY

It is also recognised that the last few months have presented challenges, in terms of a staff member leaving and covering staff maternity leave. Such events have had an impact upon service delivery, however; strategies have been implemented in an attempt to reduce negative consequences and these were discussed in detail with the manager and directors.

p.6

SUMMARY

The findings from this visit identified good outcomes for children and young people in the agency’s care. Carers are clear about their own roles and responsibilities and provide safe, nurturing placements. The agency remains keen to improve its own practice and readily described a placement where it felt it had not provided optimum support and even suggested this placement be visited, in order for the inspector to receive first hand feedback from the carer.

p.6

SUMMARY

Time and resources must now focus upon those previous requirements, which have been partly implemented and need to become firmly embedded in practice, such as case files for children and matching evidence. From this particular visit, the main area identified as requiring prompt attention is concerned with the role of the registered manager, who, because of the above factors, has been heavily involved in daily operational issues, thus preventing her from spending sufficient time on the other key areas associated with her role. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 7

p.6

What the service does well:

The agency provides regular, good quality support to carers, who in turn, feel equipped to provide a quality service to those in their care. Written procedural guidance is clear and concise and subject to ongoing review. Agency staff possess the skills, qualifications and experience needed to effectively run a fostering service. Assessments of carers and the recruitment of agency staff is thorough, therefore, vulnerable young people are protected. Young people receive the support they need to achieve their educational potential and the services to those approaching adulthood are commended.

p.7

What has improved since the last inspection?

Pro – forma’s regarding matching evidence have been devised; these need to be fully implemented. Almost every outstanding carer annual review has been conducted. Separate health care sections have now been added to children’s files and there is greater evidence to demonstrate placing authorities being ‘chased’ for missing information. As was required from the last inspection, all incidents falling under Schedule 8 of the Fostering Services Regulations 2002 are being reported to the Commission within the required timescales.

p.7

What they could do better:

The agency needs to ensure the contents of health sections within children’s files are of the same good standard and that foster carers are all given the opportunity to attend relevant health promotion training.

p.7

What they could do better:

The registered manager must be given sufficient time and resources to focus upon her monitoring and quality assurance role.

p.7

What they could do better:

Staffing levels should be reviewed, and within this, consideration should be given to reducing the amount of time the registered manager devotes to carrying an active caseload. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 8 Consultation processes with regards fostered and birth children should be developed further.

p.7

What they could do better:

Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 9

p.8

CONTENTS

Statutory Requirements Identified During the Inspection Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 10

p.9

The intended outcome for this Standard is:

• The fostering service promotes the health and development of children.(NMS 12)

p.10

The Commission considers Standard 12 the key standard to be

inspected at least once during a 12 month period.

p.10

JUDGEMENT – we looked at the outcome for Standard:

Whilst the health needs of children are promoted by the agency, this standard would be improved through more detailed record keeping and additional training for carers.

p.10

JUDGEMENT – we looked at the outcome for Standard:

The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is adequate.

p.10

EVIDENCE:

The contents of children’s files were scrutinised and it was positive to find that all now have a separate, dedicated health section; some held more information than others, and in one, the topic of ‘medical consent’ was insufficiently recorded. It was further noted that training for carers in March this year, focused on ‘healthy living’ as a core subject and there are plans for this to continue, in order for all carers to attend. The contents of the Foster Carer Agreement and Handbook clearly describe the carer’s role in terms of their responsibilities to promote and safeguard the health of those in their care and those carers visited and interviewed, demonstrated an acute awareness of this. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 11

p.10

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• Any persons carrying on or managing the service are suitable. (NMS 3) • The fostering service provides suitable foster carers.(NMS 6) • The service matches children to carers appropriately.(NMS 8) • The fostering service protects each child or young person from abuse and neglect.(NMS 9) • The people who work in or for the fostering service are suitable to work with children and young people.(NMS 15) • Fostering panels are organised efficiently and effectively.(NMS 30)

p.11

The Commission considers Standards 3, 6, 8, 9, 15 and 30 the key

standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period.

p.11

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following Standard(s):

The service is run by a competent, experienced group, however; written information pertaining to ‘matching’ still does not do justice to the actual practice of the agency. An experienced panel works effectively to provide safeguards for children, carers and the agency.

p.11

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following Standard(s):

The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is good.

p.11

EVIDENCE:

The agency effectively implements its own sound and robust recruitment procedures; hence, staff are suitably qualified and experienced to undertake the duties they perform and have been thoroughly vetted before taking up their posts.

p.11

EVIDENCE:

The recruitment of carers is equally sound and the inspection of Form F assessments confirmed this. Three sets of foster carers were visited in their own homes, where evidence was seen to support that households are safe and welcoming to children. Additional written evidence found that the number of outstanding carer annual reviews highlighted at the last inspection, has dramatically reduced, with only a few remaining and these are booked. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 12 From reading carer and children’s files, and through the above visits, it was evident that placements have only been made as a result of good matching processes; this is also borne out through the number of placements becoming long term and stable. However, the agency still needs to produce greater written evidence to support and demonstrate how such placement decisions are reached, upon a referral first being received.

p.11

EVIDENCE:

The child protection policies and procedures of the agency are clear and carers know what to report and to whom. The topic of ‘safe care’ is being particularly pursued at present and it would be of particular good practice for carers to write their own household procedures, to be monitored at each annual review. The foster carer handbook details clear guidance on behaviour management and the steps to follow in the event of a child being missing from home. Whereby any concerning incidents have occurred, the agency has readily informed the Commission and other necessary third parties.

p.12

EVIDENCE:

The personnel records of staff are securely held in the central head office and the contents of these reflect the recruitment policy and procedure in place. Written references, supported by telephone verification, CRB and other statutory checks are conducted and in place, before an employee can commence with their post and the agency now has a core staff team with a good mix of skills and interests within the fostering field. Whereby social work students are on placement with the agency, these are usually in their second or third year and are clearly being supervised and monitored, in accordance with the Fostering Services Regulations and good practice guidance.

p.12

EVIDENCE:

Written guidance pertaining to the role and function of the panel is detailed and clear. All members have undergone CRB disclosures and there remains a good mix of independent and agency staff members from varied child – care backgrounds; all have signed confidentiality and conflict of interest disclosures. Good quality written minutes demonstrate the meetings are well – planned, with each item thoroughly discussed and debated. One director is a panel advisor, without a casting vote and the responsible individual, who does not join panel meetings, is the decision maker for the agency. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 13

p.12

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• The fostering service values diversity.(NMS 7) • The fostering service promotes educational achievement.(NMS 13) • When foster care is provided as a short-term break for a child, the arrangements recognise that the parents remain the main carers for the child.(NMS 31)

p.13

The Commission considers Standards 7, 13, and 31 the key standards

to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period.

p.13

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

Diversity among children and carers is valued and young people receive the help they need to reach their academic potential. (Standard 31 is not applicable).

p.13

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is good.

p.13

EVIDENCE:

Whilst it is recognised that the geographical area covered predominantly reflects a ‘white middle class’ group, the agency continues to actively seek to recruit carers from as wide a range of backgrounds as this factor allows. This is reflected within the register of foster carers, which shows married couples, co habiting partners and single carers. Within such groups, some variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds is reflected and a range of skills is offered by each household. The agency is therefore able to accommodate youngsters with a range of presenting needs, including particular cultural/religious needs, health issues and/or disabilities. Core training for carers includes subjects such as valuing diversity and equal opportunities.

p.13

EVIDENCE:

As was found from the previous inspection, the vast majority of the children and young people in placement are in full time educational provision and it was most positive to find that carers take this aspect of their role very seriously. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 14 Excellent examples were seen, whereby carers have advocated tirelessly to secure the most appropriate school placements and one set of carers had purchased individual computer equipment for a child in their care, because of specific learning needs. The agency clearly outlines the responsibilities of carers to promote educational attainment within its written guidance and its own bank of sessional workers may be used to provide meaningful daytime activities for children who are not in full time school. Following a recommendation made from the previous inspection, the manager is now starting to collate statistical information in order to monitor school

p.13

EVIDENCE:

placements and the educational outcomes of the children and young people placed within the agency. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 15

p.14

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• The fostering service promotes contact arrangements for the child or young person. (NMS 10) • The fostering service promotes consultation.(NMS 11)

p.15

The Commission considers Standards 10 and 11 the key standards to

be inspected at least once during a 12 month period.

p.15

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

Children and young people benefit by being supported to maintain contact with those who are important to them. Sound consultation processes ensure the views and opinions of carers and children are responded to.

p.15

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is good.

p.15

EVIDENCE:

Through reviewing children’s individual files and from speaking to them and their carers, good sources of evidence were found to demonstrate that contact arrangements are being well – supported. Wherever necessary, the agency assists with travel and supervision, as do many of the carers. The topic of contact is clearly covered within the agency’s training programme, with its importance promoted within the foster carer’s handbook.

p.15

EVIDENCE:

The overall feedback received from carers, with regards consultation processes was generally good. The majority stated that their link workers keep them readily updated with regards agency developments, however; some said they would have liked greater consultation and information earlier this year, given two members of staff leaving. More positively, they felt able and encouraged to speak openly at forums such as annual reviews and many said their own children are spoken to by their link workers during home visits. Following the previous inspection, it was positive to find that work is being completed with regards seeking the opinions of children in placement, and Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 16 birth children, at their own carer’s annual review; this recommended action was made from the previous inspection and has now become a requirement. The written responses received from placing authorities was positive, with the

p.15

EVIDENCE:

majority stating that the agency works ‘very well’ in partnership with them. A good practice recommendation from this outcome group is for the agency to consider the benefits of devising and implementing additional ways to obtain the views and opinions of all of its stakeholders periodically and not just in time with annual reviews. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 17

p.16

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• The fostering service prepares young people for adulthood.(NMS 14) • The fostering service pays carers an allowance and agreed expenses as specified.(NMS 29)

p.17

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

Teenagers are provided with clear guidance and advice from their carers to prepare them for adult living. Carers benefit from being paid their agreed allowances on time.

p.17

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is excellent.

p.17

EVIDENCE:

A case tracking exercise was undertaken with regards a particular individual who will soon be making the transition towards independent living. It was disappointing to find that the placing authority has only very recently commenced with pathway planning and transitional arrangements, thus the individual remains unclear about future options. The carers however, are to be commended for their own pragmatic and structured approach, supported by the agency, in determining with the young person, the options and realistic targets ahead during the forthcoming year. This is particularly positive, given that the carers are ‘very new’ to fostering and this is their first placement. During the course of the visit to their home, they described the very practical methods they are using, in terms of boundary setting and teaching appropriate independence skills, and the young person confirmed having a clear sense of

p.17

EVIDENCE:

direction and purpose, thanks to the support and guidance being received from the foster carers. This is an excellent example of a young person being appropriately matched to carers with the skills and insight into the needs of teenagers.

p.17

EVIDENCE:

Through the perusal of records and from direct feedback received from carers, sufficient evidence was again found to demonstrate that allowances and expenses are paid correctly and on time. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 18 A separate, dedicated finance team is in place at the main head office and through working to clear and explicit financial procedures, problems and difficulties with payments occur very rarely. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 19

p.17

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• There is a clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and the fostering service ensures that they meet those aims and objectives.(NMS 1) • The fostering service is managed by those with the appropriate skills and experience. (NMS 2) • The fostering service is monitored and controlled as specified. (NMS 4) • The fostering service is managed effectively and efficiently.(NMS 5) • Staff are organised and managed effectively.(NMS 16) • The fostering service has an adequate number of sufficiently experienced and qualified staff.(NMS 17) • The fostering service is a fair and competent employer.(NMS 18) • There is a good quality training programme. (NMS 19) • All staff are properly accountable and supported.(NMS 20) • The fostering service has a clear strategy for working with and supporting carers.(NMS 21) • Foster carers are provided with supervision and support.(NMS 22) • Foster carers are appropriately trained.(NMS 23)

p.19

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• Case records for children are comprehensive.(NMS 24) • The administrative records are maintained as required.(NMS 25) • The premises used as offices by the fostering service are suitable for the purpose.(NMS 26) • The fostering service is financially viable. (NMS 27) • The fostering service has robust financial processes. (NMS 28) • Local Authority fostering services recognise the contribution made by family and friends as carers.(NMS 32)

p.19

The Commission considers Standards 17, 21, 24 and 32 the key

standards to be inspected at least once during a 12 month period.

p.19

JUDGEMENT – we looked at outcomes for the following standard(s):

Clear written documentation is provided for all interested parties. Carers and children benefit from the leadership and work practices of a qualified, motivated team of professionals. The quality of support and training for carers enhances the outcomes for children and young people. The registered manager needs to be given the time and resources to focus upon her monitoring role. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 20 The overall quality of the service in this outcome group is adequate.

p.19

EVIDENCE:

Under this outcome group, focus and attention was paid particularly towards the role and function of the registered manager of the service. Whilst it was clearly evident that she possesses the skills, qualifications and expertise to fulfil her role, recent events, including staffing absences and the loss of personnel, resulting in the agency’s decision to give her a working caseload, has had a negative impact upon her ability to focus upon monitoring and quality assurance. That said, she continues to provide quality review reports; however, she is currently unable to give this task the time and attention needed to ensure these are of the standard she is capable of. It was very positive to find clear sources of evidence to demonstrate how this agency truly values its staff; generous terms and conditions were seen and in particular, those experiencing personal or other external difficulties were being

p.20

EVIDENCE:

very well supported. This is an agency that values loyalty and remunerates individuals accordingly. The current staffing situation reflects the majority of the team as being part time and the registered manager is carrying an active caseload. Although carers stated they feel well – supported in most cases, the one negative theme was attributed to link worker availability and for such reasons the agency is required to review its current staffing levels. This is not an indication as to the quality and calibre of those in post; moreover, it is indicative that the number of hours available may not currently be sufficient. Another indicator includes children’s and other administrative records, as whilst these contain most of the elements required, the overall quality and monitoring of these is not currently receiving the attention required, due to the range of commitments of the registered manager. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 21

p.20

SCORING OF OUTCOMES

This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services have been met and uses the following scale.

p.21

SCORING OF OUTCOMES

4 Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable

p.21

SCORING OF OUTCOMES

BEING HEALTHY ACHIEVING ECONOMIC Standard No Score WELLBEING 12 2 Standard No Score 14 4 STAYING SAFE 29 3 Standard No Score 3 3 MANAGEMENT 6 3 Standard No Score 8 2 1 3 9 3 2 X 15 3 4 2 30 4 5 X 16 3 ENJOYING AND ACHIEVING 17 2 Standard No Score 18 X 7 3 19 X 13 3 20 X 31 N/A 21 3 22 3 MAKING A POSITIVE 23 3 CONTRIBUTION 24 2 Standard No Score 25 3 10 3 26 4 11 3 27 3 28 3 32 N/A Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 22 Are there any outstanding requirements from the last inspection? YES

p.21

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Fostering Services Regulations 2002 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.22

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

No. Standard Regulation Requirement Timescale for action 1. FS12 15(1) The fostering service provider shall promote the health and development of children placed with foster parents. This requirement is made within the context of the fostering service ensuring it continues with its training programme for foster carers, to ensure that all receive it. Furthermore, all children’s files are to hold the level and detail of health information records as was found in some cases, though not all.

p.22

recognised that adequate

progress has been made. An action plan, detailing how and by when, this shortfall will be addressed is required by the date shown opposite. 10/08/06

p.22

recognised that adequate

2. FS4 42 The agency is required to ensure the registered manager be given sufficient time and resources to focus upon the monitoring aspects associated with her role. 10/08/06 Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 23 An action plan, detailing how this shortfall will be addressed is required by the date shown opposite.

p.22

recognised that adequate

3. FS17 & FS22 19 The agency is required to review its current staffing structure / levels, to ensure it has the required amount to provide satisfactory levels of support to its carers, without compromising the position of the registered manager. An action plan, detailing how this shortfall will be addressed is required by the date shown opposite. 10/08/06

p.23

recognised that adequate

4. FS11 18 The agency is required to review its current consultation mechanisms, to ensure that all stakeholders be given sufficient opportunity to share their views and opinions as to the ongoing operation of the fostering service. This requirement particularly applies to fostered and birth children. An action plan, detailing how this shortfall will be addressed is required by the date shown opposite. 10/08/06

p.23

RECOMMENDATIONS

These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Registered Provider/s to consider carrying out.

p.23

RECOMMENDATIONS

No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations

p.23

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. FS8 It is strongly recommended that the agency implement the same good quality written matching evidence that was found in some cases, though not in others. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 24 2. FS23 It is recommended that the range and scope of training, available for foster carers be expanded upon. 4. FS24 & FS25 It is strongly recommended that the registered manager be afforded sufficient time and resources to focus upon the task of file monitoring. Futures For Children DS0000036638.V295900.R01.S.doc Version 5.2 Page 25

p.23

Commission for Social Care Inspection

Maidstone Local Office The Oast Hermitage Court Hermitage Lane Maidstone ME16 9NT

p.25

Commission for Social Care Inspection

National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI

p.25

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion