Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Chapelbreak Pre-School

Inspected 18 Jan 2005 · published 20 Mar 2005 · URN 254013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Julie Youngman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Jan 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Julie Youngman

  • Postcode verified

    NR5 9LG

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    254013

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoyconfidentlygood progressstrengthspositivelyconfident
Criticismweaknessesnot sufficientlynot alwaysinsufficientmissedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings139w−33
  • What needs to improve470w+16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
601
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 31%About the inspection 59%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 18/01/2005 Inspector Name Julie Youngman (TCCI)

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Sessional Day Care Setting Name Chapel Break Pre-School Setting Address Chapelbreak Village Hall Bowthorpe Norwich Norfolk NR5 9LG

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

Name The Committee of Chapel Break Pre-School 1044168

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name Chapel Break Pre-School Address Chapel Break Village Hall Bowthorpe Norwich Norfolk NR5 9LG

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

Chapel Break Pre-school is based in Chapel Break village hall. The group provides a range of care packages which include a breakfast and after school club, which operates Monday to Friday during school term time, sessional care for pre-school children aged two to five years, five mornings and five afternoons, a full daycare holiday playscheme during the summer holidays and a holiday club during school holidays and teacher inset days. They provide places for funded three and four-year-olds within the sessional care facility. The group have sole use of the village hall during each session and use a variety of rooms which include the main hall, the smaller room, the bar, toilet facilities, a small office, kitchen, storage facilities both inside and outdoors and an enclosed play area outside. The group make use of a large playing field, adjacent to the village hall, for supervised group activities. A high ratio of staff are employed and this is further supplemented by a parent rota.

p.2

Information about the setting

The majority of the staff are qualified, and a commitment to training is evident. Students are welcome on placements from the local college. The group provide much needed provision within the local area, which include Chapel Break and Clover Hill, with some children attending from the neighbouring areas such as Costessey.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

The provision for nursery education at Chapel Break Pre-School is acceptable and of good quality overall. Children are making very good progress in personal, social and emotional development and physical development. In all other areas of learning children make generally good progress. Teaching is generally good. Staff have a sound knowledge and understanding of the Foundation Stage curriculum enabling some effective experiences for children and encouraging them to be self motivated. A wide range of interesting and stimulating play based activities are planned, many of which reflect a theme. Children are well supported with all adults showing an interest in what children are doing. Staff are consistent in managing children's behaviour and they use praise well to motivate children. Although adults talk to children about the activities, they do not always use questioning effectively to extend learning.

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

Leadership and management of the setting is generally good. The group is managed by a voluntary committee that is relatively new and has not yet established an effective system to monitor and evaluate the quality of provision. There are good policies and procedures in place to ensure the smooth running of the group. Staff are aware of their roles and responsibilities and have regular meetings where the curriculum is planned and discussed. Staff are well qualified and attend courses because they are committed to improving the quality of provision. The partnership with parents and carers is very good. Parents are kept well informed through regular newsletters and notices. Information about children's achievements are shared with parents and they are encouraged to contribute each month to their child's assessments. Parents are actively encouraged to be involved with their child's learning and they receive ample information about what their child will be

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children are happy, confident, settled and enjoy the interesting activities such as the Rainbow Theme Day. Children have good opportunities to access a range of good resources and their independence is encouraged. • Staff have clear expectations of children's behaviour and they use praise to motivate children. Staff support children well and have good relationships with them. • The well qualified and experienced staff interact with children to integrate learning across all six areas of learning. • Parents are kept well informed and there are good opportunities for parents to be involved in their child's learning and assessment.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• the systems for monitoring and evaluating the provision for nursery education in order to identify strengths and weaknesses • opportunities for children to be spontaneously creative and have access to a wider range of construction material • the use of questions to challenge and extend learning • opportunities for children to write their names and numbers within daily routines.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Children respond positively to staff and have good relationships with each other. They settle quickly into the pre-school and confidently access resources and activities set out. Children are learning to share and take turns, especially within role play situations. There are good opportunities for children to access resources independently. Children's social skills are well developed by the encouragement and praise given by all adults.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children are becoming confident speakers and engage easily in conversations with other children and adults. Staff interact well with children during activities such as role play and small world play. There are various opportunities for children to recognise their name but opportunities are missed for them to write their names. Children enjoy listening to stories but adults do not spend enough time talking to children about what they have heard. Children follow instructions well.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Curriculum plans show that there are many opportunities for children to count, measure, sequence and match, linked to a wide range of topics. Children are beginning to understand and to use language appropriate to shape and size but adults do not sufficiently encourage the use of mathematical language. There are limited opportunities for children to practice writing numbers.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good There is a wide range of activities that enable the children to learn from first hand experiences such as visiting the railway station and the river and going out to see the snow falling. Children learn about their own and other cultures and enjoy using information technology. Children enjoy building with bricks but there are not always sufficient construction materials available for them to choose.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Children move confidently and safely within the spacious setting. The pre-school has good facilities and equipment for outdoor play. Children use a variety of materials and equipment, showing developing co-ordination and control. Healthy eating is encouraged and snacks of fruit and vegetables are provided.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children play imaginatively in the home corner and with small world toys. They correctly name colours when sticking shapes and pictures to make a rainbow. Children enjoy painting and singing, using wooden sticks to make a rhythm. There are insufficient opportunities for children to explore a range of materials and to be spontaneously creative.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• ensure that there are systems in place to monitor and evaluate the provision for nursery education in the setting. • develop the use of questioning to extend children's thinking and learning. • improve the opportunities for children to be spontaneously creative and have access to a wider range of construction materials. • provide more opportunities for children to write their name and numbers as part of the daily routine.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion