Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Overthorpe County Infant School

Inspected 31 Jan 2005 · published 22 Apr 2005 · URN 127777

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Name Jacqueline Fryer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    31 Jan 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Name Jacqueline Fryer

  • Postcode verified

    ME15 8XG

  • Name on report verified

    NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT

  • URN verified

    127777

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentlysuccessfullygood progresseffectiveconfidentenjoyenthusiasmclear
Criticismlimitedmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings135w−33
  • What needs to improve720w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
848
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 49%

Full report text

INSPECTION DETAILS

Inspection Date 31/01/2005 Inspector Name Jacqueline Fryer

p.1

SETTING DETAILS

Day Care Type Sessional Day Care Setting Name Willow Rise Pre-School Setting Address Downswood Community Centre Chiltern Close,Downswood Maidstone Kent ME15 8XG

p.1

REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS

Name The Committee of Willow Rise Pre-school

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

Name Willow Rise Pre-school Address Downswood Community Centre Chiltern Close, Downswood Maidstone Kent ME15 8XG

p.1

ORGANISATION DETAILS

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.1

ABOUT THE INSPECTION

The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.

p.2

Information about the setting

Willow Rise Pre-School opened in 1990 and operates from one room in a Community Centre in Downswood, Maidstone, Kent. A maximum of 26 children may attend the nursery at any one time. The pre-school is open each weekday from 09.15 to 12.00 for 38 weeks of the year. All children share access of the outdoor play area. There are currently 40 children aged from 2 to under 5 years on roll. Of these 26 children receive funding for nursery education. Children come from a wide catchment area. The pre-school currently supports a number of children who speak English as an additional language. The pre-school is jointly run by two qualified supervisors and employs seven staff. Of these, four staff, hold appropriate early years qualifications. There are two staff members working towards a qualification.

p.2

Information about the setting

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.2

How effective is the nursery education?

Willow Rise Pre-school is an acceptable provision and of good quality. The children are making generally good progress towards the Early Learning Goals. The teaching is generally good. The staff plan varied activities so they link into the weekly topic successfully, enabling children to develop and progress in many areas of learning. These are not evaluated to show their effectiveness, or differentiation for children's differing abilities. Most staff have a basic knowledge of how children learn. Children's thinking is extended through effective and challenging questioning. The staff's positive attitudes and interaction with the children encourages well behaved and respectful children. The plans of activities do not always allow children to express themselves freely through mark making and art and craft. They recognise the equal importance of free play situations in observing children's development and

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

learning. The leadership and management is generally good. There are regular opportunities for staff to identify their potential and can improve through a varied programme of training. The experienced staff members provide support and guidance for newer staff and the quality of teaching is informally monitored and evaluated. Procedures to evaluate and review the effectiveness of the routine and timing of the sessions is limited and restricts the opportunities for children to develop their independence and self selection. All staff are included in planning and their thoughts and ideas are valued. The staff team work hard at providing play and learning opportunities for the children. Partnership with parents is very good. Parents observations and comments are valued. They play an active part on the management committee. Parents speak to a key worker who has the most contact with their child and there are opportunities to

p.3

How effective is the nursery education?

ensure parents access the records. Parents are provided with newsletters and all policies are written up and shared.

p.3

What is being done well?

• Children's behaviour is very good. They show sensitivity and understanding of other people's needs. Staff are good role models for the children, they are consistent in their approach. • Children are confident, interested and motivated to learn. They concentrate well, listen and speak clearly as they communicate with both adults and their friends. • Staff provide a excellent range of information for parents, either verbally or in writing. Parents have opportunities to talk to staff regularly to discuss their child's progress and development.

p.3

What is being done well?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 • Staff provide a friendly secure and caring setting ensuring children are confident learners, able to mix well with their peers and other adults.

p.3

What needs to be improved?

• the opportunities for children to develop through further free play situations, particularly with mark making and free representation through creative play • the routine and timing of activities, to allow children opportunities to use large physical equipment both indoors and outdoors and to increase self selection, independence and choice in free play situations • the opportunities for children to continue to develop their understanding of calculation and comparison through practical activities • the differentiation in activities and structure planning to show the differing abilities of children's educational needs and how effective the planning of activities is.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

The improvements since the last inspection are generally good. At the last inspection, the provision was given two key issues; provide more systematic records of children's progress towards the early learning goals and use this information when planning activities; They have developed a systematic record system to plan for children next steps and to chart their progress towards the early learning goals. Children's assessments are used in the overall planning and observations to ensure their next steps are included in future planning. provide older and more able children with more opportunities to recognise simple words, write for a variety of purposes and develop their understanding of simple addition and subtraction through practical activities; They have extended opportunities for more able children to recognise simple words and developed their understanding of simple addition and subtraction. However,

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

there is limited progress in developing opportunities to write for a variety of purposes through practical everyday activities.

p.4

What has improved since the last inspection?

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.4

PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Very Good Children are confident and interested learners, listening to advice and trying new activities. They concentrate for substantial periods of time at adult led and free choice activities. Access to outdoor play is limited and for set times only. Children have limited opportunities to self-select resources suited to their development. They co-operate with each other, playing happily together and use the social opportunities well. Children behave well and relate to adults and to each other.

p.5

COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY

Judgement: Generally Good Children confidently join in discussions at circle time and converse well at snack time when they talk to each other. They communicate with staff and clear speech is encouraged. Children enjoy books and listen to stories and know what is next. They are encouraged through gentle questioning to explore further their ideas and thoughts. Children have limited opportunities to freely make marks, write or label their own work.

p.5

MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children count confidently up to six and above. Most children recognise and associate a number with a written numeral and can understand and use mathematical language. They sort and organise resources according to their use. However, there are missed opportunities for children to calculate and compare numbers within routine and free play activities. Children use their knowledge of shape and colour to successfully complete a range of activities, such as puzzles.

p.5

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD

Judgement: Generally Good Children begin to know about their own cultures and those of others through topics and themes. They demonstrate their understanding of properties through exploring and investigating different objects. They are keen to contribute their comments about the weather during registration. Children have limited use of basic technology to enhance and support their learning. They describe their family and explain events in their life.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children move confidently and safely around the tables and show they are aware of space. They have good co-ordination and spatial awareness, both indoors and out. Staff are on hand to give support and encourage new skills. Through varied activities and routines the children become aware of the importance of staying healthy. Children are able to develop their fine motor skills using puzzles. Opportunities to use a variety of tools in some activities are limited.

p.5

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.5

CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Judgement: Generally Good Children are successfully encouraged to develop their sense of rhythm during music and singing activities and they all participate with great confidence and enthusiasm. They have opportunities to play together in small groups in the role-play area. Children explore and investigate their senses and colour through a range of structured manipulative activities. There are limited opportunities for children to freely represent through self-selected resources, within free play activities.

p.6

Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.6

OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION

The provision is acceptable and is of good quality overall. Children are making generally good progress towards the early learning goals. The next inspection will take place in three to four years time.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

• Provide further free play activities to: develop children's understanding of calculation and comparison and to allow children to express themselves freely through mark making and art and craft activities throughout the session. • Review and implement changes to the planning to show the evaluation and differentiation of activities. Ensure the routine and timing of the session allows children further opportunities to develop independence and self selection.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.

p.7

WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES

This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion