Other · Ofsted report
Busy Bees@Maidenhead
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Jan 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
Name Glenda Pownall
- Postcode verified
SL6 7EG
- Name on report verified
NURSERY INSPECTION REPORT
- URN verified
EY243905
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Judgement: Generally Good Children interact well and are confident speakers. p.5
- Staff reinforce good behaviour by offering praise and encouragement although some behaviour issues are not dealt with appropriately. p.5
- The children are generally well behaved; they share resources and take turns at activities. p.5
- Children leave their main carer to participate in available activities. p.5
- Children often receive disrupted support from staff. p.5
- Children walk away from activities or become restless. p.5
- Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Children are confident to speak in group situations. p.5
- They use speech well to relay information and develop imaginary stories. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 676
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
INSPECTION DETAILS
Inspection Date 13/01/2005 Inspector Name Glenda Pownall
p.1
SETTING DETAILS
Day Care Type Full Day Care Setting Name Positive Steps Day Nursery Setting Address St Joseph's Church Cookham Road Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 7EG
p.1
REGISTERED PROVIDER DETAILS
Name Positive Steps Day Nursery Limited 4426856
p.1
ORGANISATION DETAILS
Name Positive Steps Day Nursery Limited Address Shellingford Primary Church Street Shellingford Oxon SM7 7QA
p.1
ORGANISATION DETAILS
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.1
ABOUT THE INSPECTION
The purpose of this inspection is to assure government, parents and the public that the nursery education for funded three and four year old children is of an acceptable quality. Inspection of nursery education also identifies strengths and weaknesses so that providers can improve the quality of educational provision and help children to achieve the early learning goals (elgs) by the end of the Foundation Stage. This inspection report must be made available to all parents. If the setting has been inspected previously, an action plan will have been drawn up to tackle issues identified. This inspection, therefore, must also assess what progress has been made in the implementation of this plan.
p.2
Information about the setting
Positive Steps Nursery is 1 of 3 nurseries and 1 out of school club run by The Positive Steps Children's Day Nursery Limited. It opened in 2003. It operates from 3 rooms in St Joseph's Centre situated close to Maidenhead town centre. A maximum of 58 children may attend the day nursery at any one time. The nursery is open each weekday from 07.45 to 18.15 for 51 weeks of the year. All children share access to a secure enclosed outdoor play area.
p.2
Information about the setting
There are currently 67 children aged under 5 years on roll. Of these, 22 children receive funding for nursery education. Children come from the local and surrounding areas. The nursery currently supports a number of children who speak English as an additional language. The nursery employs 15 staff. The manager and 8 staff hold appropriate early years qualifications. There are 3 staff working towards a qualification. Additional teaching staff provide lessons in swimming and French.
p.2
Information about the setting
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.2
How effective is the nursery education?
The provision for nursery education at Positive Steps Nursery is acceptable, but children's progress towards the early learning goals is limited by some significant weaknesses. Provision for personal, social and emotional development, physical and creative development are generally good. Teaching has significant weaknesses. There have been changes to the staff team. Most staff have a working knowledge of the early learning goals, other staff's knowledge is very limited. Planning covers all areas of learning but some aspects, such as technology, calculation and mark making are not adequately planned for. Plans do not record the learning intention of activities and how they will be adapted for individual children. An assessment system is in place but does not effectively record children's progress. An effective system is in place to support children with special educational needs. Staff generally work well together as a team. Behaviour
p.3
How effective is the nursery education?
management is generally good. Leadership and management have significant weaknesses. The organisation does not enable sessions to run smoothly. The leadership oversee planning and observe staff practise in order to monitor the efficiency of the education programme and quality of teaching. This is not effective in ensuring that the needs of all children are met. A good range of resources supports all areas of learning, but they are not all complete. Staff are not always effectively deployed to support children's learning. A staff appraisal system enables staff to identify training needs. Partnership with parents is generally good. Staff have good relationships with parents. They are provided with good information about the setting. Three parents evenings a year enable parents to view their child's records and discuss their progress. They are not informed of their child's targeted next steps. Staff do not take
p.3
How effective is the nursery education?
account of parents' comments about their child's learning.
p.3
What is being done well?
• Children form warm relationships with each other and adults. They are confident to speak within the environment to each other, staff and visitors. • Children use a good range of building resources to freely create models using their own ideas. • Staff keep parents well informed of the day to day activities of the setting through a monthly newsletter and a notice board in the room.
p.3
What needs to be improved?
• the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of teaching and the organisation
p.3
What needs to be improved?
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 of the education programme • the planning scheme to identify the main learning intentions of activities, detail how activities will provide sufficient challenge for all children and to record children's interests, achievements and possible difficulties so that the next steps in learning and teaching can be planned • the assessment system to effectively record children's progress towards the early learning goals, identify their targeted next steps in learning and inform all parents of their child's progress along the stepping stones • the opportunities children have to make decisions for themselves, use technology, practise writing for a variety of purposes and make simple calculations as part of everyday activities • staff knowledge and understanding of the stepping stones leading towards
p.3
What has improved since the last inspection?
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.4
PERSONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Generally Good Children interact well and are confident speakers. Staff reinforce good behaviour by offering praise and encouragement although some behaviour issues are not dealt with appropriately. The children are generally well behaved; they share resources and take turns at activities. Children leave their main carer to participate in available activities. Children often receive disrupted support from staff. Children walk away from activities or become restless.
p.5
COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY
Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Children are confident to speak in group situations. They use speech well to relay information and develop imaginary stories. Through planned activities they develop awareness of letters and the sounds they make. Children lose interest and concentration during group times in the overcrowded book corner and when planned story time does not take place. Children rarely use books for pleasure. Children have limited opportunity to recognise their names or attempt to write for a variety of purposes.
p.5
MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Significant Weaknesses Some children can count to 10. Children sing number songs to reinforce their counting skills. Staff miss opportunities to increase children's awareness of counting and simple calculation throughout the session. Staff support children at activities to match and recognise numerals. The use of incomplete resources limits children's progress. For example, puzzle pieces and numeral cards are missing. Staff do not extend activities to provide sufficient challenge for children who are more able.
p.5
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD
Judgement: Significant Weaknesses A satisfactory range of topics develops children's knowledge of the world around them. Related trips enhance activities such as a visit to a castle and a farm. Children access a wide range of resources to design and build. Planned activities encourage children to become aware of customs of their own culture and those of other people. Children have limited access to technology resources. Staff do not always use good questioning techniques to encourage children to think for themselves.
p.5
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.5
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Generally Good Children show good spatial awareness stopping or changing direction to avoid moving obstacles. Children show increasing control and dexterity using small tools such as rolling pins, glue spatulas, scissors and construction pieces. Activities to develop large-scale muscle skills are not effectively planned; they do not provide sufficient challenge for all children. Children develop an awareness of health and hygiene through daily routines.
p.6
CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Judgement: Generally Good Children respond positively to new experiences and are confident in communicating their thoughts, such as when smelling and feeling cornflour and water. Staff allow children time to experiment and design with construction resources. Children enjoy singing songs and rhymes from memory. They are confident in role-play situations. Some craft activities are not well planned and children have limited access to activities to express and explore creativity through art.
p.6
Children's spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is fostered
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.6
OUTCOME OF THE INSPECTION
The provision is acceptable but has some significant areas for improvement. Children's progress towards the early learning goals is limited by some significant weaknesses. The next inspection will take place in one to two years time.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
• introduce an effective method of monitoring and evaluating the quality of teaching and the organisation of the education programme • implement a planning scheme to identify the main learning intentions of activities, detail how activities will provide sufficient challenge for all children and record children's interests, achievements and possible difficulties so that the next steps in learning and teaching can be planned • develop the assessment system to effectively record children's progress towards the early learning goals, identify their targeted next steps in learning and inform all parents of their child's progress along the stepping stones • provide opportunities for children to make decisions for themselves, use technology, practise writing for a variety of purposes and make simple calculations as part of everyday activities.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
The provider must draw up an action plan within 40 working days of receipt of this report showing how the key issues detailed above will be addressed. The action plan must be made available to all parents and to the Local Authority if required. An evaluation of the action taken will form part of the next inspection of funded nursery education.
p.7
WHAT THE SETTING NEEDS TO DO NEXT: THE KEY ISSUES
This inspection was carried out under the provisions of Section 122 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion