Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 May 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth James

  • Postcode verified

    CW2 8AB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+95Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery wellexcellentvery effectiveoutstandingeffectivewell plannedextremelywell designed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings575w+95
  • What needs to improve104w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
661
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Swift Principal South Cheshire College Dane Bank Avenue Crewe Cheshire CW2 8AB

p.1

improving science in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 7 and 8 February 2011 as part of our survey in science.

p.1

improving science in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to a national report. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributors or contributing institutions but individuals and institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

improving science in colleges

The evidence base included: discussions with staff and students; observations of six lessons; a review of documentation; and a tour of the science facilities with a technician.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Pass, retention and success rates are high for most science courses.  Science teachers are very well qualified. They are enthusiastic about their subjects and they successfully convey this to their students.  Teaching is consistently good and some lessons are outstanding. Lessons are well planned and structured. Learning outcomes are very clear. Teachers use a very good range of teaching and learning activities in lessons.  Relationships between teachers and students are excellent. Teachers know their students very well and are supportive and encouraging. Students are extremely positive about the teaching they receive.  Very effective differentiation was observed in a national diploma lesson, which met the needs of students of different abilities well.  Practical investigations are used very well to enhance learning. These are well organised and good use is made of technician support to ensure that

p.1

Features of good practice

students gain the maximum benefit from their work.  Some effective use is made of information and communication technology in lessons. As well as presentations, teachers make good use of visual material, including animations and video clips.  Teachers are careful to explain concepts clearly with an appropriate emphasis on scientific terminology. Good use is made of effective questioning, often targeted at individuals. Questions encourage students to think and to work things out for themselves.  Teachers take care to prepare students well for external examinations, particularly through the use of past paper questions. The virtual learning environment provides additional opportunities for independent learning.  Learning materials are well designed and presented and include useful induction packs and handbooks.  An excellent range of courses is offered including AS and A levels in physics, chemistry, biology and science in society, GCSE science and

p.2

Features of good practice

additional science, first and national diplomas, and science units as part of the Access to Higher Education provision.  Advice and guidance are very effective in ensuring that students choose appropriate courses and are well prepared for university applications.  Underachievement is identified and workshop provision is used well to support students to help them reach their target grades. Enrichment activities, such as ‘How to get an A grade’, also contribute to raising achievement. Some good use is made of teachers’ industry links to provide enrichment opportunities.  Students’ individual learning targets and the records of progress against these provide valuable information for teachers and managers.  The quality improvement plan accurately notes that value-added data show that progress on some courses is satisfactory. Strategies have been implemented to address this and, though signs of improvement are

p.2

Features of good practice

encouraging, it is too early to see the full impact on outcomes.  The laboratories in the new building provide a modern scientific learning environment.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 continuing to develop and implement strategies to improve rates of progress by further increasing the pace of lessons and providing clear guidance and support to help students develop independent learning skills so that more time is spent on study outside the classroom  improving progression from AS to A2 courses, particularly for chemistry. I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science provision.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to the relevant funding bodies and will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion