Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    WN3 6EE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+94Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery wellhigh expectationsextremelyenjoyconfidentengaging

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings466w+92
  • Leadership100w+71
  • What needs to improve92w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
645
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Mason Headteacher St Aidan’s Catholic Primary School Holmes House Avenue Winstanley Wigan WN3 6EE

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 29 March 2011 to look at work in citizenship.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of 11 lessons and two assemblies.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: citizenship

The overall effectiveness of citizenship is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in citizenship

Achievement in citizenship is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in citizenship

 Pupils demonstrate excellent knowledge and understanding in the key areas of citizenship, such as diversity and identity, environmental sustainability, rights and responsibilities, democracy and decision-making.  Pupils have good opportunties to take roles of responsibility within and beyond the classroom. Many act as classroom monitors; some are elected house captains or nominate themselves to be part of the Eco Squad; some work as playground leaders or volunteer to read to pupils in the Reception classes.  Pupils have extremely good attitudes to learning in citizenship. They engage enthusiastically in lessons and in assemblies where they take a keen interest in current affairs, enjoy voicing their opinions and are confident in using the language of citizenship such as ‘taking responsibility’ and ‘having empathy’.

p.1

Quality of teaching in citizenship

The quality of teaching in citizenship is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in citizenship

 Lessons are thoughtfully planned with lots of interesting and engaging activities matched to pupils’ different needs and abilities. Pupils are encouraged to be critical and enquiring and develop their communication skills well. Teaching assistants are very well deployed to help those with additional needs.  Interactive whiteboard technology is used very well to add pace and interest to lessons and classrooms and corridors have many excellent citizenship-related materials and displays. The school is aware that pupils would welcome more opportunities to use computers to research citizenship topics in school and have plans in place to enable this to happen.  Teachers demonstrate high expectations of work and behaviour in lessons and in response, pupils strive for excellence. Books are well marked and include comments to help pupils improve.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in citizenship

The quality of the curriculum in citizenship is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in citizenship

 The curriculum is well balanced, coherent and comprehensive. Learning in citizenship is seamlessly integrated into the whole learning programme and enhances the study of topics such as India, homes and family and the Second World War. For example, Year 2 pupils learn mathematics by calculating household bills while debating and deciding whether a telephone is a necessity or luxury.  Extra-curricular visits and partnerships further enhance the curriculum. Links with Hope Children’s Centre, a local Mosque and a primary school in Horwich help develop pupils’ awareness of difference and diversity.  The curriculum allows many opportunities for pupils to prepare to play an active role as citizens. They understand the importance of participation and believe that through participating they can ‘make a difference’. Many give much of their own time to charity fundraising and members of the student council attend ‘Little Voices’ meetings at the Town Hall where their

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in citizenship

opinions are sought on policy issues affecting local children.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in citizenship

Leadership and management in citizenship are outstanding.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in citizenship

 The school has a sound vision and rationale for citizenship which reflects the whole-school ethos. Senior leaders support citizenship well with material resources, curriculum time and staff training. Governors play an active role in supporting and evaluting provision and outcomes. Subject documentation demonstrates a good understanding of the subject’s strengths and areas for development; action planning draws on pupils’ evaluations.  Citizenship is linked very effectively to the school’s duty to promote community cohesion. The community cohesion action plan has clear objectives, strategies and outcomes, including valuing diversity and promoting human rights.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving pupils’ access to information and communication technology to research topical issues  developing further pupils’ cultural awareness through meeting people from a range of ethnic and religious backgrounds.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion