Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 May 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Johnson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Johnson

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressimprovedeffectiveextremelyrespectfulenjoystrengthssupportive
Criticismdeclinedlackconcernpersistently absentunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings768w+40
  • What needs to improve117w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
884
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mrs M Collinson Headteacher Biddick Hall Junior School Chesterton Road South Shields Tyne and Wear NE34 9SP

p.1

Junior School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 12 April 2011. Thank you for the time you gave to our planning meeting and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the staff, pupils and members of the governing body who met with me.

p.1

Junior School

Since the last inspection, a member of staff who was on maternity leave has returned to work, as has a member of staff who had experienced a period of long-term sickness. A newly-qualified teacher has been appointed. The school roll has declined slightly, partially as a result of the relocation of the unit which supported Key Stage 2 pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.1

Junior School

As a result of the inspection on 4 and 5 March 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Junior School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Junior School

In 2010, the proportion of pupils who attained the expected levels in national tests at the end of Year 6 rose significantly to slightly above the national average in English and well above average in mathematics. Although the attainment of both boys and girls rose, girls’ attainment continued to be higher than boys. Tracking data indicates that the school is likely to meet and even exceed its statutory targets this year, although it may not reach the same levels across all subjects as those attained in 2010. Pupils known to be eligible for free school meals performed as well as their peers. Pupils’ progress in 2010 accelerated quickly in both mathematics and English. Evidence from the school tracking data and through lesson observations indicates progress has been strengthened again this year. The attendance rate has improved since the last inspection and the number of pupils who are persistently absent

p.1

Junior School

Page2 As reported at the previous inspection, pupils continue to behave well, are friendly, courteous and respectful of one another and the adults in school. They are very keen to do well and enjoy most lessons. Pupils’ understanding of faiths and cultures and the multicultural nature of Britain has been improved. Various methods have been used to enrich the curriculum but a key one has been the establishment of an effective partnership with a local school that has pupils from a more diverse range of backgrounds.

p.2

Junior School

Lesson observations confirmed the school’s self-evaluation of the strengths and areas for improvement in teaching and learning and that key improvements have been made. However, some records of lesson observations done by the school lack sufficient evaluation of the development of pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding and tend to focus too much on teacher activity. More practical activities have been introduced into lessons, particularly in science, which stimulate pupils’ interest and ensure they are more involved and better challenged by their work. Marking has been improved with the result that pupils are clearer about the quality of their work and what they need to do to improve. Sometimes, however, it is unclear what opportunities pupils are given to respond to the comments that teachers write on their work. There is better use of tracking information to identify pupils whose progress is a cause for concern and appropriate intervention is put in place where

p.2

Junior School

pupils’ progress is not as expected. Teaching assistants work well to support teachers although sometimes their work is not monitored as well as it could be to measure its impact on academic progress.

p.2

Junior School

The role of middle leaders has been strengthened. They make a more effective contribution to school improvement and the monitoring of levels of attainment and progress. The governing body continues to be extremely supportive of the school but could be more challenging and evaluative when measuring its success. The single central register of checks on staff meets current government requirements. The local authority has provided good support to the school, for example in its efforts to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.2

Junior School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place on

− developing the range of learning activities that offer pupils exciting opportunities for practical and investigative activities, so that pupils are involved and challenged in lessons − ensuring that data are well used to develop teaching and learning, so that work is well matched to the needs of individual pupils − improving the consistency of marking, so that pupils are clear about the level of their work and what they need to do to improve it − ensuring that leaders at all levels rigorously monitor the impact on attainment of initiatives intended to improve the quality of teaching and the curriculum.

p.3

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place on

 Develop pupils’ understanding of faiths and cultures and the multicultural nature of modern British society.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion