Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 May 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    B11 4SF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery wellmake good progressstrengthswell plannedwell supportedeager
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings718w+91
  • Leadership105w+82
  • What needs to improve96w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
890
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr T Lacey Headteacher Arden Primary School Baker Street Sparkhill Birmingham B11 4SF

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 March 2011 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of two whole lessons and parts of four other lessons; and a tour of the school with pupils.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Pupils enter school with levels of attainment in knowledge and understanding of the world, including ICT, and communication, language and literacy, which are well below the national average.  A minority have little, or no, access to new technologies at home and are not familiar with hardware or software on entry. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children are very well supported and rapidly learn how to use a keyboard and mouse, the interactive whiteboard, digicams and digital microphones. They make good progress overall. Pupils enter Year 1 below expectations. They continue to make good progress. By Year 6 they achieve levels that are in line with national expectations for ICT. Given their starting point, this represents excellent progress.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make similar progress to other groups. They are very well supported in ICT lessons.  Classrooms and the hall are fitted with a sound induction system to enable

p.1

Achievement in ICT

those with hearing impairments to be fully included.  Pupils at the early stages of English language acquisition are also well supported in ICT lessons and also make outstanding progress.  Pupils enjoy ICT. Their behaviour in lessons is outstanding. They are courteous, and respect each other, teachers, teaching assistants and the equipment. They are eager to learn and willing to support each other.  By Year 6, pupils’ knowledge and understanding of how to stay safe when using new technologies are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

The quality of teaching in ICT is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

 The quality of teaching is outstanding overall and never less than good.  The subject leader teaches ICT regularly to all classes from Reception to Year 6. This ensures a consistency of approach to teaching throughout the school.  The ICT teacher is very ably supported when teaching lessons in the suites by the network manager, the teacher of the class and teaching assistants. As a result, different groups of pupils are very well supported.  This approach does not exclude teachers and teaching assistants from their responsibilities of teaching ICT. Teachers are fully involved in the planning and teaching of lessons, and sequence of lessons, within their classroom and also additional lessons in the suites.  The success criteria for a lesson are shared with pupils, so that they can self- and peer-assess and set targets for their next stage of learning.  Staff are fully informed of developments in ICT, through regular training.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

 Newly developed assessment procedures are supporting teachers in their planning and tracking of pupils’ progress. However, they do not fully match National Curriculum levels, and add complications to the tracking process.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 The curriculum is well planned to meet the interests of all pupils.  Excellent links are made between ICT and a range of subjects. These have a positive impact on pupils’ standards and achievement, especially in literacy, numeracy and personal and social development.  Pupils who do not have access to technology at home are able to use school facilities at lunchtimes.  Good links have been made with the local secondary school to support the teaching of data-logging and to provide activities for more able pupils.  Gifted and talented pupils attend activities organised by the Royal Shakespeare Company, which include writing and recording play scripts.  The before-school mathematics club is very well attended and supports pupils’ numeracy and ICT skills well and also their social development.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

Leadership and management in ICT are outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

 The vision for ICT is very clear and understood by staff, pupils and governors.  After shadowing the previous leader for a term, the present leader took over the post in September 2010. The change has been seamless and continues to build on the many strengths of ICT.  The subject leader is given excellent support by the network manager.  The governing body is very supportive of the subject and is actively involved in ensuring that ICT provides value for money.  The strengths and areas for improvement are known and regularly reviewed. Self-evaluation is accurate.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 refining the newly introduced procedures for tracking pupils’ progress so that the system has clarity and ease of use for all teachers and support staff and fully matches National Curriculum levels for ICT.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion