Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pat Kime

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pat Kime

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingconsistentlyrigorousrobustimprovedeffectivewell behavedsuccessful
Criticisminadequateweakpoorfailednot sufficientlylackinsufficientnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings815w−42
  • Leadership285w+57
  • What needs to improve393w+75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,487
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 25%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 glaw@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Ms C McLachlan Headteacher St Peter's Church of England Primary School Whitefield Road Bury Lancashire BL9 9PW

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 5 Apr 2011 and 6 Apr 2011, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in May 2010.The full list of the areas for improvement which were identified during that inspection are set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

School

Progress since being subject to special measures - satisfactory

p.1

School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection - satisfactory

p.1

School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

School

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Bury.

p.1

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Raise attainment and accelerate pupils’ progress in English, mathematics and science by:  improving the quality of teaching so that it is at least good  ensuring that pupils’ key skills are developed consistently and systematically through a wide range of curriculum subjects  using assessment information to carefully plan and implement the precise next steps in pupils’ learning.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Increase the effectiveness of leadership and management, including governance by:  ensuring that the monitoring of teaching and learning is rigorous and impacts on improving outcomes for pupils  making better use of information on pupils’ progress to set challenging targets and expectations for individuals or groups  ensuring that all teachers are held accountable for the progress made by pupils in their class.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Ensure that safeguarding systems and procedures are robust and regularly maintained and updated.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Improve the outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage by:  monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of recent changes in provision  ensuring consistently good teaching and learning across the Nursery and Reception classes  monitoring children’s progress closely so that underachievement is addressed promptly.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place in

 Raise pupils’ attendance so that it is at least in line with the national average.

p.2

Evidence

The inspector observed the school's work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, middle leaders and other teachers, pupils, two members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and the acting special educational needs coordinator.

p.3

Context

There have been several changes since the previous monitoring inspection. Two teachers, one of them the special educational needs coordinator, have been on sick leave since January and their classes are currently taught by temporary teachers. The role of special educational needs coordinator is being covered, on a voluntary basis, by a teacher who is due to join the school’s staff next term, as a class teacher. A new Chair of the Governing Body was appointed, on a temporary basis, in January. Arrangements are in place for a specialist leader in education to support the school next term as the lead teacher funded by the City Challenge for Greater Manchester is moving on. Three teachers have been appointed to join the staff in September 2011.

p.3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Pupils’ progress is improving. In most of the lessons observed the majority of pupils made at least satisfactory progress and in some lessons progress was good. Pupils were generally well behaved and applied themselves to their work. The best learning was seen in lessons where groups of pupils undertook practical activities in order to solve problems. Pupils who met with the inspector, all from Year 6, believe they are doing much better in their learning. They put this down to interesting lessons, in which they know what is expected of them, and individual targets to check their progress against.

p.3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

The school’s records of pupils’ attainment and their progress would indicate that the majority of pupils are making gains in their learning. Nonetheless, pockets of significant underachievement remain and, for too many pupils, progress appears to have stalled. In Years 4, 5 and 6 attainment in writing remains low.

p.3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Children’s progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage has improved, though it is better in the Reception Year than in Nursery.

p.3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:  raise attainment and accelerate pupils’ progress, in English, mathematics and science – satisfactory

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page4  improve the outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage - satisfactory

p.4

Other relevant pupil outcomes

The school has taken a firm approach to improving attendance. The importance of school attendance is more to the fore with pupils, and parents and carers. A range of rewards for good attendance has been introduced and the headteacher and the governing body have clamped down on holidays in term time. The attendance rate has improved since January, compared with the same period last year, but it is still not as high as it should be.

p.4

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:  raise pupils’ attendance so that it is at least in line with the national average – satisfactory

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

The teaching seen was better than that observed in December, with more that was of a good quality. For the most part, teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are higher and work is better matched to the range of pupils’ attainment within each class. Greater consistency of methodology is evident across the school. For example, marking of pupils’ work follows a consistent policy throughout the school. Pupils’ exercise books showed that teachers balance recognition of learning with pointers for further improvement. The more successful lessons were well structured and well focused with clear objectives which pupils understood. They built up pupils’ learning progressively through appealing activities.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Nonetheless, inadequate teaching has not been entirely eradicated and some of the satisfactory teaching is not sufficiently strong to promote effective learning over time. Teachers have had a great deal of support to improve their skills, from the lead teacher funded by the City Challenge, local authority staff, the school’s senior staff and visits to observe good practice in other schools. However, in some cases this support has had limited impact on the quality of their teaching. Where teaching was less effective, it was primarily because of weak understanding of the subject or the needs of the age group. This resulted in a poor match of work to pupils’ learning needs, a lack of clarity about what pupils were to learn and a slow pace that failed to engage pupils’ attention and interest.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

An agreed annual cycle of assessment activities has been established to keep track of pupils’ progress as they move up the school. Appropriate steps have been taken to improve the accuracy of teachers’ assessments of pupils’ work in English and mathematics. However, some earlier data are insecure. Consequently, although a suitable system is now in place and followed by all teachers, insufficient secure data have built up to give a reliable measure of pupils’ term by term progress.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

This term the school has introduced a more cross-curricular approach to the teaching of subjects other than English and mathematics. The planning for this is adequate but, as yet,

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page5 opportunities for pupils to use and develop key skills across subjects are not planned robustly.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Staff appreciate that the headteacher and deputy headteacher, with support from the City Challenge and the local authority, have established consistency in the school’s work; clarified what is expected of staff; and supported them in meeting higher expectations.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The wider senior leadership team has an enhanced role. Staff with responsibility for leading work in English and mathematics have benefitted from training in leadership. They feel empowered to monitor and evaluate work in these subjects and to make a meaningful contribution to the drive for school improvement. Leadership of other subjects is considerably less well developed.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Rigorous monitoring of teaching has continued and meetings with teachers to discuss their pupils’ progress have become part of the regular routine so a culture of greater accountability is accepted. These activities are supplemented appropriately by individual support plans for staff and individualised packages of support.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The Chair of the Governing Body brings a wealth of relevant experience to the role and has a good understanding of what needs to be done and how improvement might be achieved. The governing body has a clear action plan to guide its work. Governors are becoming more involved in school life and in supporting the school’s leaders and holding them to account.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The arrangements for safeguarding pupils have been enhanced by the extension of the perimeter fence to include the portable classroom.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on areas for improvement:  increase the effectiveness of leadership and management, including governance – satisfactory  ensure that safeguarding systems and procedures are robust and regularly maintained and updated – satisfactory

p.5

External support

The local authority and the City Challenge have continued to provide the school with effective support and advice which is valued by staff.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that pupils who have fallen behind or whose progress has stalled catch up as much lost ground as possible.  Rigorously review the impact on pupils’ achievement of actions taken to promote improvement and use the findings to influence planning for the future.

p.5

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Page6  Prepare carefully for the arrival of new staff to ensure that the momentum of improvement is not reduced.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion